Mafiascum.net

In post 944, Lady 4 wrote:Pros of dating me:
Always willing to consider other perspectives
Funny
Town and able to show it
Trying my best

Cons of dating me:
So-so at scumhunting
Wishy-washy
High variance in play quality between games
Two left feet

Yawn.


Right now I feel as if I got left on read L5. You really mess with my anxiety ya know.

In post 948, Gentleman 6 wrote:why?

I think your pairing would be most likely to be a TvT and I think people would eventually come around to it even if they didn't agree to it right now. (Fact you two are TvT)

In post 946, Lady 7 wrote:I know it’s a pt not qt by the way I just like the way qt sounds better.

A throwback to a more refined time. You're a sophisticated lady.

also because u r a qt

Why is skitter factually town when she hasn't posted all game

I think she is town and her posts read more townie and Lady 4/Lady 7 seem lynchable so we need to pinch the pool.

Why is Lady 1 factually town*

Gut?

In post 952, Lady 2 wrote:

In post 946, Lady 7 wrote:I know it’s a pt not qt by the way I just like the way qt sounds better.

A throwback to a more refined time. You're a sophisticated lady.

also because u r a qt

awe shucks

A more refined time it was!

I need to start reading the gentlemen.

For some reason I find them harder to read than the ladies.

In post 954, Lady 3 wrote:Lady 7 seem lynchable

I suppose there’s a first time for everything.

Anyways,

unless Lady 1 got replaced ~I think when that slot starts posting its going to rise in priority and I want to pinch the pools to force bad pairings for scum?

In post 946, Lady 7 wrote:I know it’s a pt not qt by the way I just like the way qt sounds better.

... something something something some flirtatious remark about you being a qt.

In post 949, Lady 2 wrote:

In post 943, Gentleman 4 wrote:Lady 2, if you could pick three people to be left out right now, who would you choose?

I'd go with L5, L8 and ... L1 maybe? Or maybe G3? That's a little spicy, possibly the technically correct answer would be to leave out the three scummiest gents and force three of hopefully the scummiest ladies to be left without partners? G3, G8 and ... dann, no, I'm honestly willing to keep every other gent for now. Nah, go back to my first suggestion, leave out L5, L8, and either L1 or L6 I suppose. This sets up six ladies with eight gentlemen asking, with my hope to leave G3 and G8 with unrequited invitations.

Dann isn't here anymore. This comment was supposed to be funny, but I'm not perfectly certain how to convey that through text.

What makes you want to leave behind Miss 8?

In post 950, Gentleman 5 wrote:Yawn.

You don't need to reply if you don't have anything worth saying.

In post 960, Lady 3 wrote:Anyways,

unless Lady 1 got replaced ~I think when that slot starts posting its going to rise in priority and I want to pinch the pools to force bad pairings for scum?

Can you elaborate on this magical sick pocket read on the person with like 2 posts?

I guess it matches nicely with everyone else's magical sick townreads on you.

In post 958, Gentleman 5 wrote:I need to start reading the gentlemen.

For some reason I find them harder to read than the ladies.

Any gentlemen in particular you find difficult to read?

In post 963, Lady 4 wrote:

In post 960, Lady 3 wrote:Anyways,

unless Lady 1 got replaced ~I think when that slot starts posting its going to rise in priority and I want to pinch the pools to force bad pairings for scum?

Can you elaborate on this magical sick pocket read on the person with like 2 posts?

I guess it matches nicely with everyone else's magical sick townreads on you.

No, I just gut townread the slot and the slot seems to have enough charisma not to get lynched so its a good endgame pairing.

I would not use the word charisma to describe Lady 1.

In post 966, Lady 4 wrote:I would not use the word charisma to describe Lady 1.

Oh you know wished you signed up as a man so you could ask her to dance. Don’t deny it!

7 why don't you think pairing with 6 is optimal for you?

I highly doubt Lady 1 is skitter.

I'm not opposed to her being matched with Gentleman 6, but I'd rather he not let his opinion be swayed too much. In his shoes I'd retrace my steps through the game and find where I've been and what I've thought to attempt to arrive a girl who sways to a similar rhythm. I think that far too often we reach for that which looks -- in the moment -- appealing, but forget our senses and what we know to be good.

Explain?

In post 961, Gentleman 4 wrote:

In post 946, Lady 7 wrote:I know it’s a pt not qt by the way I just like the way qt sounds better.

... something something something some flirtatious remark about you being a qt.

In post 949, Lady 2 wrote:

In post 943, Gentleman 4 wrote:Lady 2, if you could pick three people to be left out right now, who would you choose?

Dann isn't here anymore. This comment was supposed to be funny, but I'm not perfectly certain how to convey that through text.

What makes you want to leave behind Miss 8?

Yeah that was a mobile autocorrect for "damn", RIP dann.

L8 ... has done a whole lot of nothing? Okay, she's not alone exactly in that regard, maybe L3 is comparable but she's interactive in ways I feel L8 hasn't been. It feels like she's said words but they haven't been words that accomplish stuff. And also looking back her sheeping of G6's reasoning on L5 (L5 being only jokey is something he thinks more likely to come from Town) is kind of icky for me, especially considering the proportion of L8's contributions that had to do with L5's posting style stuff early. I don't know, I see almost no townvibe stuff in her contributions and not even an in to question if more can come of it the way I ha've like with like G7. Like if G6 was still interested in pairing with her I'd be okay with that and maybe we could get a better read from that going forward. But even G6 isn't looking for that anymore and I'm happy for him to pair with L7 or L4 if he wants, there's plenty if utility waiting there.

I would just love it if we could not do alt guesses at all. Meta is a shifty beast in the first place, and vastly worse here. Also, for the spirit of the game.

Who are you looking to pair with Lady 2?

In post 968, Lady 3 wrote:7 why don't you think pairing with 6 is optimal for you?

There’s *something* I question his motives for. He didn’t seem inclined to talk to me much which makes me think interaction wouldn’t be that great. If he wants someone who can be obvtown, that’s fine I’ve never had a problem doing that, that’s fine, but I worry that we’ll end up being unproductive if I’m correct in my understanding of how he reads the game and gets reads. Too waffly people sometimes end up with nothing concrete.