Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2019 12:21 pm
It’s what you’re getting for now. Last game I caught both scum that started out because they sounded “off”. You sound “off”.
Okay I don’t care that much bc I doubt I’m getting mislynched today and saving RC!scum I think the game is just winning anywayIn post 950, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:It’s what you’re getting for now. Last game I caught both scum that started out because they sounded “off”. You sound “off”.
I would rather just lynch scum tho, even if he’s not the rbIn post 954, RadiantCowbells wrote:I explicitly do not want to vote Loserdude today. don't think that he is ever the Roleblocker.
I do not think this is a town postIn post 928, LoserdudeOG wrote:My paranoid ass is thinking this is a setup. Who here even is a newb? It was me and Arkais. That implies that there is exp players on scumteam. Why would they let this happen? Why wouldn’t they kill a PR or leader role? Is it possible that this was intentionally a bad kill to shift focus away from experienced players?
Yeah but killing rb makes me useful again so I like that idea.In post 956, Menalque wrote:I would rather just lynch scum tho, even if he’s not the rbIn post 954, RadiantCowbells wrote:I explicitly do not want to vote Loserdude today. don't think that he is ever the Roleblocker.
Cant wait to prove you wrong when I flip townIn post 958, Menalque wrote:I do not think this is a town postIn post 928, LoserdudeOG wrote:My paranoid ass is thinking this is a setup. Who here even is a newb? It was me and Arkais. That implies that there is exp players on scumteam. Why would they let this happen? Why wouldn’t they kill a PR or leader role? Is it possible that this was intentionally a bad kill to shift focus away from experienced players?
This feels like a very deliberate attempt to (1) try to get us thinking about unlikely scenarios vs likely ones (2) very specifically agenda-y
I’m literally never playing this game again after this is done because of this I’m going to screw every town team I’m on.In post 964, RadiantCowbells wrote:like townie-who-says-all-the-wrong-things
Honestly I’m gonna not get my hopes up on you thinking I’m town because of the last three times you’ve gone back on it. But thanksIn post 966, RadiantCowbells wrote:i genuinely don't think you're posting is scummy. i keep waffling on it but i keep going back to not really knowing why i would scumread you outside of 'weird'
In post 968, Dunnstral wrote:I don't want to vote loserdude
For future reference, doctor should be an unproveable claim day 1, since I can be roleblocked and the cop can be killed, which is why I didn't claim it when I first got to L1. Instantly believing the claim yesterday after being prompted for it is... kind of scummy, honestly. From Menalque.
In post 818, Menalque wrote:I’d be lying if I said I believed Dunn’s doc claim but I think it’s prob incorrect mechanically to lynch him today anyway
You’re allowed to talk about completed games, just not ongoing onesIn post 969, LoserdudeOG wrote:@mod am I allowed to comment on play styles of players in their previous games that have already finished?