Mafiascum.net

In post 756, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 690, 72offsuit wrote: BM I have lower, as null - felt townie during the day but the early hammer was bad and

denied me posting my reads and getting reaction to my reads from others

.

In post 697, 72offsuit wrote:Null
BM
621 - Scummy post and vote. Early hammer

denied me posting my reads and getting reaction to my reads from others

.

Ok I get the hint! But it was hardly an early hammer, and based on how you'd played on Day 1, I don't think you really believe I was scummy for hammering before you could post your reads.

In post 758, Zantetsu wrote:

In post 740, Battle Mage wrote:Ok well with that somewhat clarified, and in the spirit of the day, I'm claiming as well

Nothing has been clarified. But nice job trying to pick your moment for this bs claim.

I'm a '

PT Cop

', which means I can investigate people and find out if they are in private threads (which presumably is because we have neighbours and scum).

What a convenient role for you to claim, given that it suddenly has the same effect as a cop given the fact that a neighborhood was just revealed.

Last night I investigated Zantetsu and he came up positive. Given the claims and his reaction seems pretty unlikely he is a neighbour/mason, so he must be scum.

This is complete bs. I could not possibly have come up positive in an investigation by a PT Cop. I am not in any private threads.

VOTE: Battle Mage

In post 761, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Like yeah, it buys scum an extra day. But he get’s outed as scum and people can use that association to find the next scums. The only plausible explanation i can see is that he fake claims to protect someone else being wagoned, but wouldn’t that also become apparent if he was exposed?
I just don’t see what scum!Battle Mage would gain from faking a guilty on you at this stage of the game. And you’ve even made it clear that you’re claiming no PT’s on your person. So explain that result then?

In post 794, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 792, Battle Mage wrote:And where does that leave 72offsuit?

He could still be town. If Luca flips mafia neighbor, then he is most definitely town. It doesn't make much sense for there to be 2 scums in 1 neighborhood.

In post 795, UnaBombaH wrote:Oh wow.
I'm going to give you my full role now, and I do not feel bad about the way I acted.
I just think this is a bullshit role to have, compared to the way it works.
I've lost all interest in this game now, because my honest opinion is that my role doesn't work like it "should".
I've consulted the wiki almost ten times after I got my Role-PM, and thought my role works in quite a clear way.
I even made a clear implication to the mod before the game started, about how I assumed my role would work, and he didn't feel like correcting me.

My actual role, and full claim is

Simple Combined Neapolitan Doctor.

My actual result after mod doublechecking is "not Vanilla Townie".
Now, I checked multiple times from the wiki, and it explicitly says

Simple is a role modifier that modifies the way in which an active action is used; it causes the action to fail, as though it were roleblocked, when used against a player who is not vanilla. In other words, only Vanilla Townies and Goons of the various anti-town factions will be affected by a Simple action; other players are too complex to be vulnerable.

MEANING THAT I SHOULD ONLY GET THIS RESULT FROM A VANILLA-MAFIA, RIGHT?!?

Well, now mod has returned to me, and given me an answer.
Since I can't directly quote our PM's, I'm going to paraphrase it next:
My doctor action only works on vanilla town. Sure, makes sense.
But I'm then told that I will still get a "Not Vanilla Town" -result, on anyone that doesn't have a "Vanilla Town" role pm.
WHY?
Why doesn't the Simple-modifier affect on the FIRST ROLE MENTIONED, BUT AFFECTS THE SECOND?

In post 797, UnaBombaH wrote:Oh, and the mod also says I will only get "no result" if I'm being roleblocked or the target is ascetic.
But the part I quoted from the wiki in my latest post clearly says that simple would cause my actions to fail if I target someone who is not Vanilla. (alignments aside)

In post 382, UnaBombaH wrote:Bah, that was an inconsiderate post to make, I'm sorry.
I would've been fighting Covid in Naples with my luck anyway..

In post 804, UnaBombaH wrote:

In post 800, Battle Mage wrote:So you're saying Luca might not be scum after all? As he has claimed a non-vanilla townie role!

All we know for a fact is that he is in a PT, and he is not a Vanilla

TOWNIE

.
He could still be a Mafia Goon (and I do think he is because my action went through on him anyway), but the way the mod answered my question to him, makes it seem like it's not a 100% guilty after all.
And that pisses me off like hell.

In post 835, Looker wrote:

In post 729, Zantetsu wrote:

In post 436, Zantetsu wrote:You will see that as

Una is concentrating on profii

, he is signalling that he knows something about profii that the rest of us do not.

Una
is

c

oncentrating

o

n

p

rofii

Una is cop

I'm lost. You knew that Una was a cop and crumbed it? How and why?

In post 740, Battle Mage wrote:Last night I investigated Zantetsu and he came up positive. Given the claims and his reaction seems pretty unlikely he is a neighbour/mason, so he must be scum.

Vote: Zantetsu

Who's all fighting here? Is it just BM vs Zantetsu? Also, Norway vs UnaBombah? Who's on who's side so I can make a decision.

In post 742, Riabi wrote:Agreed, and I think this kind of puts us in a holding pattern for the mod to confirm whether or not there was an error, doesn't it?

Does this mean that the game comes down to setup spec and mechanics? Was someone's cover blown?

In post 750, Battle Mage wrote:Egix96 is worth a read in light of Zantetsu-scum.

Is Egix even still in this game?

In post 754, Battle Mage wrote:I read a bunch of your old games...

I'm sorry you had to go through all that. I promise I'm trying to be better.

In post 782, UnaBombaH wrote:

In post 732, Zantetsu wrote:But then it doesn't seem possible that town!Una actually is simple neopolitan who got a

+

In post 733, Zantetsu wrote:Whoops ignore the last sentence of my last post, it was some garbage that I accidentally left in when writing my post.

Seems like a potential PT-slip from scum.

What's the slip? I don't get it.

In post 804, UnaBombaH wrote:

In post 800, Battle Mage wrote:So you're saying Luca might not be scum after all? As he has claimed a non-vanilla townie role!

All we know for a fact is that he is in a PT, and he is not a Vanilla

TOWNIE

.

I don't think neighbors count as vanilla.

In post 808, Zantetsu wrote:Like, I play in the normal queue to avoid this stupid bullshit.

Most of this has gone over my head.

---

• I wish Norway would put some effort into this game.

In post 853, Luca Blight wrote:

In post 743, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Zantetsu should claim. In fact i’m starting to wonder if a mass claim wouød be best at this point. Then we can do setup analyzis and find out who is the most believable.

Encourages a mass-claim, which is just scummy as fuck when someone has just claimed a guilty result. Only scum could benefit from a mass-claim at this point.

In post 859, Luca Blight wrote:If Norwegian turns out to be Town then I’m gonna be pissed, but right now I’m convinced that isn’t a townie thought process and only comes from scum trying to maneuver into position for the win.

Lynch Zant -> Norwegian, and if he flips Town then he’s fucked the game anyway by this ridiculous push and I’ll happily take the next lynch.

Current bet for Norwegian’s partner would be my neighbor, 72. The way he’s lining up the Egix invest makes me wonder if there’s some manipulation (false clear?) there, though.

In post 951, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Lol, i'll be back when 72's read through the game.

In post 964, 72offsuit wrote:

In post 951, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Lol, i'll be back when 72's read through the game.

I've read through now

In post 965, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 964, 72offsuit wrote:

In post 951, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Lol, i'll be back when 72's read through the game.

I've read through now

So Zantetsu is most likely scum. Yes?
Who do you believe his teammates are?

In post 966, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Oh and what's your take on Battle Mage's and Una's claims? Do you think they are town? Do you think Luca is scum/town?
What night actions should Battle Mage/Una take?
What's your take on Egix's Friendly neighbor claim? etc etc...

In post 934, UnaBombaH wrote:Why though?
If no one claims you visited them, it's a 1v1 between you two then.

In post 968, 72offsuit wrote:No, I think Zantetsu is town and BM is scum.

In post 760, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Zantetsu. If BM is lying. He’ll be lynched tommorow. What is the reason for BM to fake claim a guilty on you if he dies tommorow assuming you flip town?

In post 761, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Like yeah, it buys scum an extra day. But he get’s outed as scum and people can use that association to find the next scums. The only plausible explanation i can see is that he fake claims to protect someone else being wagoned, but wouldn’t that also become apparent if he was exposed?
I just don’t see what scum!Battle Mage would gain from faking a guilty on you at this stage of the game. And you’ve even made it clear that you’re claiming no PT’s on your person. So explain that result then?