Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 12:10 am
Are you sure it was inevitable? popo had only 2 votes on him at the time.
Yeah I was just looking at that myself. Here's the context:In post 950, Tanner wrote:Are you sure it was inevitable? popo had only 2 votes on him at the time.
NICE - I was getting to that as well.In post 951, UnaBombaH wrote:Food for thought: assume popopopo is scum fakeclaiming - how did they know georgebailey didn't go anywhere N1?
Hold it - scum tracker is a thing too, so no, the George association isn't a hard scum point. But George is scum nonetheless.In post 951, UnaBombaH wrote:Food for thought: assume popopopo is scum fakeclaiming - how did they know georgebailey didn't go anywhere N1?
Yes.In post 956, Tanner wrote:@Persi, perhaps. You'd put him as the third with Prana, or?
Popopop said Luca tracked George N1. Popopopo replaced that slot so one would assume they would be privileged to know the results of Luca’s N1 actions.In post 951, UnaBombaH wrote:Food for thought: assume popopopo is scum fakeclaiming - how did they know georgebailey didn't go anywhere N1?
I was about to say that, technically a scum Vanilla Cop is a thing too.In post 957, Persivul wrote:Hold it - scum tracker is a thing too, so no, the George association isn't a hard scum point. But George is scum nonetheless.In post 951, UnaBombaH wrote:Food for thought: assume popopopo is scum fakeclaiming - how did they know georgebailey didn't go anywhere N1?
If popo isIn post 959, mavsfan41 wrote:Popopop said Luca tracked George N1. Popopopo replaced that slot so one would assume they would be privileged to know the results of Luca’s N1 actions.In post 951, UnaBombaH wrote:Food for thought: assume popopopo is scum fakeclaiming - how did they know georgebailey didn't go anywhere N1?
That's why it's food for thought and not an outright mistake.In post 957, Persivul wrote:Hold it - scum tracker is a thing too, so no, the George association isn't a hard scum point. But George is scum nonetheless.In post 951, UnaBombaH wrote:Food for thought: assume popopopo is scum fakeclaiming - how did they know georgebailey didn't go anywhere N1?
Apologies, that was the wrong word to use. I meant it along the lines of "are they your current solve?"In post 962, Persivul wrote:Oh, and note that I'm notputtinghim on. Those three have been my scum team for some time. See 879. Now this desperate play by popo to get rid of me, and George jumping right on? I mean I'd almost flip myself at this point just to prove the point and get them all lynched.
I think he would? I remember Luca saying he suspects George.In post 963, UnaBombaH wrote:That's why it's food for thought and not an outright mistake.In post 957, Persivul wrote:Hold it - scum tracker is a thing too, so no, the George association isn't a hard scum point. But George is scum nonetheless.In post 951, UnaBombaH wrote:Food for thought: assume popopopo is scum fakeclaiming - how did they know georgebailey didn't go anywhere N1?
I'm also considering whether Town!Tracker-LucaBlight would've checked George N1...I guess it's more likely than scum!Luca tracking town!George?
If we lynch Persivul today, we could still potentially get more results from a Tracker. (as in - believe popopopopo = scum-Persivul)In post 952, UnaBombaH wrote:I'm trying to weight the pros and cons in my head.
I don’t understand this. Popopopo wouldn’t be a scum tracker.In post 957, Persivul wrote:Hold it - scum tracker is a thing too, so no, the George association isn't a hard scum point. But George is scum nonetheless.In post 951, UnaBombaH wrote:Food for thought: assume popopopo is scum fakeclaiming - how did they know georgebailey didn't go anywhere N1?
Persivul is claiming he went nowhere. That would mean scum!Popopopo is lying about even being a tracker and trying to frame Persivul with a fake claim/fake results. If Persivul is town and is telling the truth about going nowhere, that would mean Popopo isn’t even a tracker let alone a scum tracker. Sure, sure, they could be a scum tracker who did track George N1 and tracked someone else N2 OTHER than Persivul and is trying to frame Persivul but I just don’t see it.In post 936, Persivul wrote:Scum claim. I went nowhere last night. I can't.In post 892, popopopopopopo wrote:i tracked persivul last night, he visited eve
Well, even if this is scum!Persi and town!popo, and we lynch Persi today, I think popo just gets shot tonight. There wouldn't be any more results from him.In post 966, UnaBombaH wrote:If we lynch Persivul today, we could still potentially get more results from a Tracker. (as in - believe popopopopo = scum-Persivul)In post 952, UnaBombaH wrote:I'm trying to weight the pros and cons in my head.
If we lynch popopopo today, we basically force scum to kill Persivul/mavs, and we still have one rather-easy-to-believe townslot left. (as in - believe Persivul = scum-popopopo).
I hadn't thought of that. Unless you think me/popo is scum theater, then lynching popo today conftowns me, which in turn conftowns mavs.In post 966, UnaBombaH wrote:If we lynch popopopo today, we basically force scum to kill Persivul/mavs, and we still have one rather-easy-to-believe townslot left. (as in - believe Persivul = scum-popopopo).
I'm doing my best to save this situation, let's not give them anything more.In post 970, Tanner wrote:Well, even if this is scum!Persi and town!popo, and we lynch Persi today, I think popo just gets shot tonight. There wouldn't be any more results from him.
My thoughts are in bold. Can't believe you brought it up yourself in a moment like this..In post 972, Persivul wrote:I hadn't thought of that.In post 966, UnaBombaH wrote:If we lynch popopopo today, we basically force scum to kill Persivul/mavs, and we still have one rather-easy-to-believe townslot left. (as in - believe Persivul = scum-popopopo).Unless you think me/popo is scum theater, then lynching popo today conftowns me, which in turn conftowns mavs.