Page 39 of 58

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 6:26 am
by QuantumQuasar
I'll repeat this you who reads this as civilian and doesn't know the rank of ensign,

civilian

You're resorting to such trivial and petty matters that are disgraceful to the fallen on the battlefields, this is shameful!

You are required to surrender immediately from your takeover attempt

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 6:29 am
by Datisi
straight up asking scum to concede. on day 1. now i've seen everything.

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 6:37 am
by Iconeum
In post 950, QuantumQuasar wrote:I'll repeat this you who reads this as civilian and doesn't know the rank of ensign,

civilian

You're resorting to such trivial and petty matters that are disgraceful to the fallen on the battlefields, this is shameful!

You are required to surrender immediately from your takeover attempt
You have no authority over the RoseN3

VOTE: drew

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 6:56 am
by Euphony
What if he's a GunN2 though, what you gonna do then

Why are we voting Drew now?

@+ Hectic

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 6:57 am
by Euphony
In post 883, Euphony wrote:Have you been consciously playing differently due to rolling captain?

¬2[// Hectic
Could you answer this, Kanna?

:@= Hectic

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 7:04 am
by Euphony
In post 895, Drew-Sta wrote:
Spoiler: Drew wall
In post 776, Iconeum wrote:
In post 771, Drew-Sta wrote:
In post 770, Iconeum wrote:Anyone want kanna over pepper?

Drew have we played before?
Not sure.

Also, I was on Kanna from the start. Why are you doing this now when I asked literally pages ago to consider it? This is not a consistent approach.
Because it's insistence that im scum despite lit everyone telling her they don't se thé resemblence is pinging me
Misread =/= scum. You should know that.
In post 779, Iconeum wrote:
In post 771, Drew-Sta wrote:
In post 770, Iconeum wrote:Anyone want kanna over pepper?

Drew have we played before?
Not sure.

Also, I was on Kanna from the start. Why are you doing this now when I asked literally pages ago to consider it? This is not a consistent approach.
Explain this

Because you re thé inconsistent one here
Huh? This makes no sense, especially when you've flipped votes more than underwear this day phase.
In post 781, Iconeum wrote:Yeah we can do kanna now
If we can do Kanna then why do you do this?
In post 880, Iconeum wrote:UNVOTE:

i think euph is town tho
You're losing credibility here.

I feel like what you're doing is effectively drilling people and casting shade, which you can revisit in later phases. This isn't scum hunting, it's obfuscation.
In post 787, DoctorPepper wrote:Idk why the wagon on me just died.

But if ever I do get lynched today, I feel like we should take a look at the most opportunistic vote in the lot

VOTE: DrewSta

This is a really bad push and something to look for on Day 2.
Your post is negligent. It ignores other peoples flip floppyness but focusses on one person (tunnelling or deliberate ignorance - uncertain), ignores the fact I have sat on Kanna most of this phase, then saw your inconsistency and considered it scum based and adjusted with other players to work toward a lynch. My flip from Kanna does not mean I consider them town, but a decision to work with people towards towns best interests.

Your obvious attempt to derail focus is clear. I genuinely consider you scum.
In post 790, DoctorPepper wrote:Nah man, you're just really opportunistic
And you're not? Hypocritical and a liar to boot. Lynch all liars.
In post 791, DoctorPepper wrote:761 is a really bad post and it doesn't bring anything new to the table. You basically just parroted the existing reads to justify jumping on the wagon
I agreed with existing reads and added my thoughts. You're misrepresenting me big time here.
In post 793, Datisi wrote:
In post 143, DoctorPepper wrote:I actually think Drew is town, idk where this is coming from
In post 153, DoctorPepper wrote:Never said it wasn't. I'm just saying my gut tells me that Drew is being active in a way that I find productive to town, instead of people being active but not contributing anything to the discussion
In post 471, DoctorPepper wrote:My initial reads have me at
Town:
Oka
Dats
Drew

Nullish Town
Aldus
Kanna

Nullish Scum
QQ

Scum
Icon
Euph
so uhhh..... what changed from these?
And there, Dr, is the hypocrisy pointed out.
In post 817, DoctorPepper wrote:
In post 815, Euphony wrote:
In post 616, DoctorPepper wrote:
In post 601, Kanna wrote:
In post 559, Datisi wrote:reminder still waiting on Kanna's reads
I'm in a confusing state right now but I think <Datisi, OkaPoka, Aldus, DrP> are town, the rest i can't tell you atm
Oh yay you're town
Why does this make Kanna town? Because she thinks you're town?

And why'd you find Drew-Sta's vote more opportunistic than Oogle's on your wagon?

£÷÷ Hectic
Kanna is intentionally taking unpopular stances

Oka's voting pattern is consistent
Intentionally taking unpopular stances =/= town.
In post 831, Iconeum wrote:QQ woke up since kanna votes

Drew pushing me to'take a look at kanna and then freaking out when i do is ehm strange?
It's not strange at all. I'm trying to understand why you would look at Kanna and adjust the train off Dr when it was moving ahead productively and we had some consensus on them being scum. You effectively derailed your own train, and it reads as suspicious. As if you bussed your partner and then needed to get them off the hook.
In post 854, Kanna wrote:I really don’t like this constant pushing to L1 then switching targets because it’s honestly just rolefishing
No, it is not. It gives insight. If someone claims, it's information we can use later on to determine if they're lying or not.
PRs/Positions are non-indicative of alignment, scum can roll anything from Jailkeeper Captain to a no PR Ensign. Why do you think scum have any reason to lie about claims or counterclaim?

How confident are you on Ico + Doctar?

>>$ Hectic

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 7:08 am
by Euphony
DocMirinda's acceptance of being lynched today does feel kinda towny, but I'm not sure how much that should sway my read on the rest of his play.

I could be convinced on Drew; I don't like his overconfidence on the Doc or his Ico bussing proposal.

¬]}~ Hectic

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 7:09 am
by Datisi
In post 953, Euphony wrote:Why are we voting Drew now?
i think because some of his posts felt lamist, pepper is sorta towning it up, and my gut is pinging me.

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 7:26 am
by Iconeum
In post 957, Datisi wrote:
In post 953, Euphony wrote:Why are we voting Drew now?
i think because some of his posts felt lamist, pepper is sorta towning it up, and my gut is pinging me.
+1

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 10:35 am
by Euphony
revisiting my early game exchange with drew-sta, it is possible that his asking me why i did not post about patterns i did not notice was simply a misunderstanding in the same way that it is possible that alduskkel simply misinterpreted my reasoning for my early game push on drew-sta. however, here:
In post 182, Drew-Sta wrote:Ok, I missed that post. My apologies.
drew-sta said he missed a post that he had previously replied to, after i pointed out that he provided the exact reasoning for my early game approach that i had previously given. as though he wanted to look like he was solving and naturally reached the correct conclusion.

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 12:22 pm
by OkaPoka
i hate to flash lhf for content reasons but we should really just flash this

VOTE: qq

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 12:25 pm
by Kanna
In post 908, Iconeum wrote:Kanna

If you think im scum for deathtunnel meta

What do you think of fdrew falling me out for Flip flop Ping and being all over thé place?
Honestly, I can’t use that point because I don’t see things the same way as Drew if that makes sense

You’ve also misunderstood my scumread on you
>right now, I Do Not Know about you. I’m pretty sure I’ve said this before too
>the deathtunnel thing was for a very specific timeframe ~around the time you entered the game and before I outed the tell.
>most of my discussion has been about *that* and the tell itself because it just kept going back and forth
>although I do stand on DP’s side with the you vs him

gut says that question feels kind of like you just want to prove me wrong which feels weird, but I’m not getting into that

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 12:27 pm
by Kanna
In post 914, DoctorPepper wrote:Anyway, with an out captain
:cry:

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 12:29 pm
by Datisi
In post 960, OkaPoka wrote:i hate to flash lhf for content reasons but we should really just flash this

VOTE: qq
on one hand i don't
disagree


on the other i feel like this is a potentially very bad idea

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 12:30 pm
by OkaPoka
tbh when was the last time someone who was lamist actually was scum

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 12:30 pm
by Kanna
just a suggestion but i really would not like more claims today for reasons

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 12:32 pm
by Kanna
In post 954, Euphony wrote:
In post 883, Euphony wrote:Have you been consciously playing differently due to rolling captain?

¬2[// Hectic
Could you answer this, Kanna?

:@= Hectic
No (the actual answer)

Why did you ask this question?

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 12:36 pm
by Datisi
In post 964, OkaPoka wrote:tbh when was the last time someone who was lamist actually was scum
idk i've been told that i'm lamist-y as scum

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 12:37 pm
by Euphony
I don't think we should flashwagon Quentin.

Kanna, I asked because I'm trying to get some insight into whether your peacemaking approach in regards to the main wagons was indicative of role or alignment.

~~? Hectic

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 12:39 pm
by OkaPoka
who do you want then

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 12:39 pm
by Kanna
I feel like at the moment, I know enough things for there to be a slight advantage so I *suggest* we just stick to <DP, Ico>

I've been tring DP for ages so I think it's clear where I stand about that

But at the same time, I've never felt great about Drew and if people don't want to go Ico

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 12:40 pm
by Euphony
I get what you're saying about no more claims, but roles aren't indicative of alignment and we should be trying to hit most likely scum though.

VOTE: Drew-Sta L-1
shiki and I think this right now

}34# Hectic

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 12:41 pm
by Kanna
I guess it's about compromise at this point, but i still really want to nail in I *suggest* we just stick in the pool

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 12:42 pm
by Euphony
Is Drew in the pool? You said you've never felt great about him.

[]= Hectic

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 12:42 pm
by Kanna
Mafia know if PRs/officers are town. I am doing my best to predict stuff and protect them