Newbie 2016: Snapdragons (Game Over)


Forum rules
User avatar
72offsuit
72offsuit
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
72offsuit
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3465
Joined: December 28, 2019
Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder

Post Post #950 (ISO) » Sat Jul 11, 2020 1:38 pm

Post by 72offsuit »

LL/Porkens wagon was a steaming pile of dung. Id say 1 scum off wagon. Clark off wagon, raya on wagon. Gg.

VOTE: Clark
User avatar
ClarkBar
ClarkBar
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
ClarkBar
Goon
Goon
Posts: 879
Joined: June 16, 2020
Location: PDX

Post Post #951 (ISO) » Sat Jul 11, 2020 1:40 pm

Post by ClarkBar »

^Intent to hammer and Jam's little gambit for the hammer not withstanding?
User avatar
Battle Mage
Battle Mage
Jester
User avatar
User avatar
Battle Mage
Jester
Jester
Posts: 22231
Joined: January 10, 2007

Post Post #952 (ISO) » Sat Jul 11, 2020 1:50 pm

Post by Battle Mage »

In post 947, ClarkBar wrote:Thanks for the quick response, BM. Going to ask a couple more questions.

1. Are examining/guessing about NK's a worthwhile pursuit of Town? (not an attack on you for BM, just a general best practices thing.)

2. Is Raya scum? I'm not interested in responses to this one from Raya or BM, though they are welcome. I do want to hear from everybody else on this matter.
1. It's not hugely valuable, but also doesn't do any harm. I don't think it's something we should be overly pre-occupied with.

2. No, I don't think Raya is scum.
Show
2020 Stats - 31 completed games:

Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4

winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%
User avatar
TheThirteenthJT
TheThirteenthJT
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
TheThirteenthJT
Goon
Goon
Posts: 366
Joined: May 25, 2020

Post Post #953 (ISO) » Sat Jul 11, 2020 1:52 pm

Post by TheThirteenthJT »

VOTE: 72offsuit

I disagree with those feeling 72 is town after that turn. I explained the reasons for the opposite Day 1.

Clark and Raya are still some of my favorites and Battle Mage is now also suspect to me.

Jamesv is weird...

No thoughts on Looker yet. Most of my thinking is still based off Homuras play which I will revisit.

Current areadlist scum to less scum.
72 confident here.
Raya
Clark
battle mage
Looker
Jamsv

I see a few potential scum pairings too.
72 and Clark or BM and Clark. I have no pairing for Raya currently.

Quick thoughts, I'm tired tonight and will check back in tomorrow.
User avatar
ClarkBar
ClarkBar
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
ClarkBar
Goon
Goon
Posts: 879
Joined: June 16, 2020
Location: PDX

Post Post #954 (ISO) » Sat Jul 11, 2020 2:09 pm

Post by ClarkBar »

I think you're close to the money with that list, 13JT. Can you tell me why Looker is so much of a town-read though?
User avatar
Battle Mage
Battle Mage
Jester
User avatar
User avatar
Battle Mage
Jester
Jester
Posts: 22231
Joined: January 10, 2007

Post Post #955 (ISO) » Sat Jul 11, 2020 2:21 pm

Post by Battle Mage »

In post 945, ClarkBar wrote:
In post 943, Battle Mage wrote:initial thoughts: Jam-scum wouldn't have made that weird play yesterday around the Porkens wagon.
I think I agree. Still, a dick move.
In post 943, Battle Mage wrote:Raya's posts at end of day had conviction and didn't leave herself open to a Porkens town-flip. Felt legit.
Please explore this further. Conviction at that point is, to me, not AI.
In post 943, Battle Mage wrote:Must be at least 1 scum on the Porkens wagon because there was no reason not to be, therefore must be TTJT and/or Looker.
I think some people had blinders on yesterday due to LL's play. But Looker was so actively scumhunting...
In post 943, Battle Mage wrote:need to revisit 72offsuit as i think i basically locktowned him based on pork being scum.
And for me 72 being scum was largely contingent on Porkens being scum.
In post 953, TheThirteenthJT wrote:VOTE: 72offsuit

I disagree with those feeling 72 is town after that turn. I explained the reasons for the opposite Day 1.

Clark and Raya are still some of my favorites and Battle Mage is now also suspect to me.

Jamesv is weird...

No thoughts on Looker yet. Most of my thinking is still based off Homuras play which I will revisit.

Current areadlist scum to less scum.
72 confident here.
Raya
Clark
battle mage
Looker
Jamsv

I see a few potential scum pairings too.
72 and Clark or BM and Clark. I have no pairing for Raya currently.

Quick thoughts, I'm tired tonight and will check back in tomorrow.
In post 954, ClarkBar wrote:I think you're close to the money with that list, 13JT. Can you tell me why Looker is so much of a town-read though?
Clark - Can you talk me through this one? You started by saying 72o would only be scum with Pork, and after he votes you, you agree with TTJT's assessment he is top scumread? Or is there another part of the list you agree with?

TTJT - As per post above, if both your potential scum pairings include Clark, why voting for 72o?
Show
2020 Stats - 31 completed games:

Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4

winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%
User avatar
ClarkBar
ClarkBar
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
ClarkBar
Goon
Goon
Posts: 879
Joined: June 16, 2020
Location: PDX

Post Post #956 (ISO) » Sat Jul 11, 2020 3:51 pm

Post by ClarkBar »

In post 954, ClarkBar wrote:I think you're
close
to the money with that list, 13JT.
Can you tell me why Looker is so much of a town-read though?
I'll decline any invitation for further thought until everybody checks in.
User avatar
72offsuit
72offsuit
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
72offsuit
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3465
Joined: December 28, 2019
Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder

Post Post #957 (ISO) » Sat Jul 11, 2020 4:52 pm

Post by 72offsuit »

In post 953, TheThirteenthJT wrote:VOTE: 72offsuit

I disagree with those feeling 72 is town after that turn. I explained the reasons for the opposite Day 1.

Clark and Raya are still some of my favorites and Battle Mage is now also suspect to me.

Jamesv is weird...

No thoughts on Looker yet. Most of my thinking is still based off Homuras play which I will revisit.

Current areadlist scum to less scum.
72 confident here.
Raya
Clark
battle mage
Looker
Jamsv

I see a few potential scum pairings too.
72 and Clark or BM and Clark. I have no pairing for Raya currently.

Quick thoughts, I'm tired tonight and will check back in tomorrow.
If you have 2 top scumteams in mind and Clark appears in both, why would you not vote clark?
User avatar
72offsuit
72offsuit
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
72offsuit
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3465
Joined: December 28, 2019
Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder

Post Post #958 (ISO) » Sat Jul 11, 2020 4:54 pm

Post by 72offsuit »

In post 953, TheThirteenthJT wrote:VOTE: 72offsuit

I disagree with those feeling 72 is town after that turn. I explained the reasons for the opposite Day 1.

Clark and Raya are still some of my favorites and Battle Mage is now also suspect to me.

Jamesv is weird...

No thoughts on Looker yet. Most of my thinking is still based off Homuras play which I will revisit.

Current areadlist scum to less scum.
72 confident here.
Raya
Clark
battle mage
Looker
Jamsv

I see a few potential scum pairings too.
72 and Clark or BM and Clark. I have no pairing for Raya currently.

Quick thoughts, I'm tired tonight and will check back in tomorrow.
Why do you scumread me if i scumread your other top 3 scumreadas. Non sequitur. It does not follow.
User avatar
72offsuit
72offsuit
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
72offsuit
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3465
Joined: December 28, 2019
Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder

Post Post #959 (ISO) » Sat Jul 11, 2020 4:55 pm

Post by 72offsuit »

Ok BM beat me to it
User avatar
72offsuit
72offsuit
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
72offsuit
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3465
Joined: December 28, 2019
Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder

Post Post #960 (ISO) » Sat Jul 11, 2020 7:51 pm

Post by 72offsuit »

Looker replacement for Homura

Homura - No lean either way prior to her replacement out. Didn't really do much. Felt like the most likely partner for !scumRaya in the early game.
She hasn't posted anywhere onsite since 5 July, the day after her last post in this game - No reads based off her replacement out.

Looker - Townlean.

My general impression of Looker based off our previous games is he tends to get offside with a player or 2 as town,
doesn't post a whole ton of content, which tends to him getting lynched. His reads don;t tend to be particularly accurate in general.
Don;t have a game with him in which he has been scum to compare to.

His readslist style and posting tone and content feels the same as his normal town game.

Despite a measly 7 posts, throwing Looker into the "Probably town" bin at this stage, given:
- 4 other scummy slots in Clark, Raya, TTJT and BM
- Of those wagoning LL, I can most sympathise with Looker's vote and reasoning on LL in post 474 , stating LL was scum "faking his outrage".
This theory is consistent with LL's abrasive/attacking style as scum being wagoned.
[ See: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p11853926 ]

- Post 637: Abrasive post that doesn't help !scumagenda

- Post 746: Reasoning for his lynch flips for information seems genuine, and feels consistent with the order of value of information would be garnered from flips.
So can see the town-motivation here.

Previous games of ours if anyone cbf:
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=82578
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=82564
User avatar
72offsuit
72offsuit
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
72offsuit
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3465
Joined: December 28, 2019
Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder

Post Post #961 (ISO) » Sat Jul 11, 2020 9:46 pm

Post by 72offsuit »

Battle Mage replaced Blopp
Blopp: null-scum
BM : also null-scum


Post : Scummy. Scumreads me for wagon pressuring a newbie on page 1 for "piggybacking with no explanation", despute it being a page 2 vote.


Post : AWFUL, but not scummy reasoning to townread Clark - "no reason to defend the newbie here as scum"
As i mentioned before, !scumClark can easily pocket newbie!townBlopp here. Given BM replaced into the Blopp slot, this isn't alignment indicative on its own,
but does increase stocks in the Clar/BM scum duo.


Post : Analysis of Clark's post 74 feels genuine. I also didn;t like the shift in Clark's view on LL.
Seems opportunistic given the direction LL's slot was heading in, with plenty of attention on that slot.


Post / : Garbage readslist pretty much, pretty much disagree with most of the reads.
Having said that, I;m not particuarly enamoured with !townBM's reading accuracy.


Post 480:
"I think an LL scum-flip should give an easy solve, although I haven't worked that through yet - will do that once I've experienced the whole game."

Dangles the LL-elimination carrot, selling it as as "easy-solve", both encouraging others onto the townLL wagon and justifying his own vote on the wagon.


Post :

Only 1 scumread though, and largest wagon at this point, so not going out on much of a limb. Although she hasn't given herself much room for manoerve either.

- This statement gives me town vibes, feels like its coming from a town-mindset.
Seems to assess the probability of !scumRaya's readslist from a scum-agenda point of view, reasonable conclusion.


Post : Scummy vibes. Feels a bit red-herring-ish in hindsight. Discusses a scenario (!scumLL) that is now known to be false.
"Lucky-scum making this argument further suggests 72-town (too much association)"

--- scum101 - appearance of being pro-town by making statements regareding player alignments/associations,
but based on theories KNOWN to be false, thus rendering ZERO information for futures days.

i.e: !scumBM knows LL is town, so talks about !scumLL scenario, which when LL is lynched, gives nothing.


Post : Town-vibe from this post.
Rehashing a post in which a townie calls you out as being scum is -EV for scum. It is detrimental for scum agenda.
I don;t feel !scumBM drags up a post about Quick scumreading BM, even an FPS-player like BM.


Post feels like its coming from a townmindset, poking at inconsistency from TTJT.


I moonlight as a diagnosis specialist. I have diagnosed BM with a terrible affliction. It is a rare disease endemic to mafia/werewolf players known as FPS.
Yet, that nasty illness known as Fancy Play Syndrome. If he can bus 2 scum buddies even when there is ZERO need to do so, he will still do so.

I'd say BM is probs town if one of TTJT or Clark is scum.
If Raya is scum, then I would say BM scum stocks go up +++.
Killing off Quick, BM's scumread, also fits !BM FPS.

BM's progressional overall in terms of readslist seems ok.

I think his slot gets resolves through the eliminations of Clark/TTJT/Raya.

Conclusion: Null-scum
User avatar
Raya36
Raya36
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Raya36
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4661
Joined: May 22, 2017

Post Post #962 (ISO) » Sat Jul 11, 2020 11:47 pm

Post by Raya36 »

In post 943, Battle Mage wrote:jesus christ. i'm alive and all my suspects are dead
and town
. :facepalm:

initial thoughts: Jam-scum wouldn't have made that weird play yesterday around the Porkens wagon. Too conspicuous and odd for no reason.
Raya's posts at end of day had conviction and didn't leave herself open to a Porkens town-flip. Felt legit.
Must be at least 1 scum on the Porkens wagon because there was no reason not to be, therefore must be TTJT and/or Looker.
need to revisit 72offsuit as i think i basically locktowned him based on pork being scum.
I may be biased but 72 has been really aggressively pushing me and the reasoning doesnt all feel that great
User avatar
Raya36
Raya36
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Raya36
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4661
Joined: May 22, 2017

Post Post #963 (ISO) » Sat Jul 11, 2020 11:49 pm

Post by Raya36 »

In post 944, ClarkBar wrote:
In post 943, Battle Mage wrote:jesus christ. i'm alive and all my suspects are dead
and town
. :facepalm:
In post 832, Battle Mage wrote:I'm sure I'm getting NKed tonight when you flip scum anyway, but they'll lynch your obvscum buddy Quick tomorrow thanks to me! :D
This tough for me, and somewhat WIFOMEY (apologies for using an acronym as a verb) but would scum NK their biggest scum-read? Anybody is free to weigh in here.
I think so. For wifom and to maintain a town leading position with less suspicion held on them
User avatar
Raya36
Raya36
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Raya36
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4661
Joined: May 22, 2017

Post Post #964 (ISO) » Sat Jul 11, 2020 11:50 pm

Post by Raya36 »

In post 946, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 944, ClarkBar wrote:
In post 943, Battle Mage wrote:jesus christ. i'm alive and all my suspects are dead
and town
. :facepalm:
In post 832, Battle Mage wrote:I'm sure I'm getting NKed tonight when you flip scum anyway, but they'll lynch your obvscum buddy Quick tomorrow thanks to me! :D
This tough for me, and somewhat WIFOMEY (apologies for using an acronym as a verb) but would scum NK their biggest scum-read? Anybody is free to weigh in here.
it's WIFOM really, but yeah, as a general rule I probably wouldn't because it basically pins you on 2 mis-elims and discredits your reads. :lol:

Having said that, he suspected me too, so 3 probable explanations for the NK:

1. I killed Quick because he suspected me.
2. Someone else killed Quick to make me look bad.
3. Someone killed Quick because they thought he was a PR, or he was an SE (although little evidence of either that I saw).
Why include yourself in the explanations....
User avatar
72offsuit
72offsuit
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
72offsuit
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3465
Joined: December 28, 2019
Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder

Post Post #965 (ISO) » Sun Jul 12, 2020 12:32 am

Post by 72offsuit »

In post 962, Raya36 wrote:
In post 943, Battle Mage wrote:jesus christ. i'm alive and all my suspects are dead
and town
. :facepalm:

initial thoughts: Jam-scum wouldn't have made that weird play yesterday around the Porkens wagon. Too conspicuous and odd for no reason.
Raya's posts at end of day had conviction and didn't leave herself open to a Porkens town-flip. Felt legit.
Must be at least 1 scum on the Porkens wagon because there was no reason not to be, therefore must be TTJT and/or Looker.
need to revisit 72offsuit as i think i basically locktowned him based on pork being scum.
I may be biased but 72 has been really aggressively pushing me and the reasoning doesnt all feel that great
Then convince me you are town. I have 4 scumreads, it needs to go down to 2.
Who is scum? Why are they scum? Make it foolproof.
User avatar
JamSV
JamSV
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
JamSV
Goon
Goon
Posts: 621
Joined: June 17, 2020
Location: England

Post Post #966 (ISO) » Sun Jul 12, 2020 2:08 am

Post by JamSV »

In post 953, TheThirteenthJT wrote:VOTE: 72offsuit

I disagree with those feeling 72 is town after that turn. I explained the reasons for the opposite Day 1.

Clark and Raya are still some of my favorites and Battle Mage is now also suspect to me.

Jamesv is weird...

No thoughts on Looker yet. Most of my thinking is still based off Homuras play which I will revisit.

Current areadlist scum to less scum.
72 confident here.
Raya
Clark
battle mage
Looker
Jamsv

I see a few potential scum pairings too.
72 and Clark or BM and Clark. I have no pairing for Raya currently.

Quick thoughts, I'm tired tonight and will check back in tomorrow.
I have to disagree, with 72 and Clark scumteam, and suggest Clark + Looker instead.
VOTE: ClarkBar
User avatar
TheThirteenthJT
TheThirteenthJT
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
TheThirteenthJT
Goon
Goon
Posts: 366
Joined: May 25, 2020

Post Post #967 (ISO) » Sun Jul 12, 2020 3:06 am

Post by TheThirteenthJT »

Forgot tO add BM +72 scum team. You have two players juipsstifying you are town at the start of the day phase based on the flip. When in all honesty I feel that the flips only implicates you more because of the constant buddying with LL before Porkens and counterwagoning day 1. If you flip red your partner will be either BM and Clark.

I am also ok with a Clark vote here because of Day 1 play and I don't think early day 2 play has been helping my thoughts. Agrees you are town 72, tries to deflect attention to Jamsv, and agrees with my list despite 72 being my top scumread and town for them? Clark flip implicates BM for me.

Now BM as individual hasn't been giving me too many scumvibes, may be biased for my bro here. Associations a re what have him as a suspect.

Raya has been the scummiest player day 1 for me (Clark almost tied) and I need to see more from them here Day 2. At this point my advice would be to stop worrying about the pressure on you and instead helping scumhunt since most of their posts have been about defending themselves and I know I've been stuck in that pocket. This is also the biggest doubt I have reflecting their play.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5161
Joined: February 20, 2009

Post Post #968 (ISO) » Sun Jul 12, 2020 4:15 am

Post by Looker »

In post 753, JamSV wrote:
Spoiler:
In post 746, Looker wrote:
In post 683, Porkens wrote:Looker replaced Homura: Lurky as fuck. How can I read this?
I'm not lurky, you just have nothing better to do with your time. You made 72 posts in the course of a day. I have things to do, a job, and an occupation where I don't have access to my phone.
Flip preferences: 29% Porkens | 20% JamSV | 16% Raya | 14% ThirteenthJT or LicketyQuick | 12% Battle Mage | 9% 72offsuit | 0% ClarkBar


I've been working longer hours so I'm more irritated by the time I get home. Sorry. LuckyLuciano is not a bad person. His fakeclaim and AtE are still scummy, though.
Okay so important question, I'm going to assume, that it is in order of scum likeliness, such that the higher percentage we have, the scummier we are. In that regards, why is Clark 0%, a perfect town read, I find it interesting given none of us have him as our strongest town read. Can we interpret it as mason buddies / scum buddies, as realistically, even if I was convinced Battle Mage was the towniest town that town has ever seen, there's still a chance something could change and I'd want to remove him, the 0% seems suspicious if we consider % by scum likeliness.

If we consider % instead by removing based off of scum likeliness + you liking their play style, I think the 0% on Clark and the 9% on A9offsuit makes less sense. I'd like an explanation on 72offsuit's if that's the case.

As such, instead of leaving this up to interpretation what %s represent and why you have the numbers, could you care to order us by scum likeliness?
I don't understand which words you were trying to put in my mouth. Either way, you didn't wait for my explanation before you hammered.
In post 773, JamSV wrote:I decided to do a bit of work for Looker, because I was curious. Based off of mod's vote count posts because I'm too lazy to go through 30 pages. Thank you Nahdia.
Table of who voted for whom voted for whom:
https://imgur.com/Cv3ZhUu idk how to include images into a post properly.

A bunch of logic stuff, read if you want, but it's in a spoiler if you don't want to.
Spoiler:
Now as we know, Looker gave Clark a 0% chance to be scum based off of who voted him, and who he voted for. He voted for Looker himself, and Porkens. Obviously he will treat himself as town, that means voting for Porkens does not make you scum at all, meaning Looker scum reads Porkens.

By those standards, myself, LicketyQuickety, and Raya36 should have lower %s by his standards. That isn't the case though. Meaning, those who voted for us, make us scum. In my case, based off of Mod vote counts, nobody has voted for me, yet I'm the 2nd highest to be scum for it, weird. This is strike 1 for his post being nonsensical.

Raya was voted for by TTJT and 72os, and voted Porkens and LicketyQuickety, from this we can assume Looker town reads TTJT, 72os, and LicketyQuickety. However based off of the percentages for me, Raya, lickety, and TTJT, this makes no sense again. This is strike 2 for his post being nonsensical.

LicketyQuickety voted for Battle Mage, Porkens, 72, and TTJT, well, we just worked out TTJT and 72 were town, and a vote on porkens gave ClarkBar a 0%, so this implies Battle Mage is scum. This is strike 3 for his post being nonsensical.


Basically, what the spoiler says is, its nonsense, I could explain more but I got bored. I felt like proving his post about how he got his %s was just a lie. I really would like to see his read list on everybody, doesn't necessarily need an explanation, I'd also like an explanation between the 0% on Clark because his explanation was nonsense, and on the 9% for 72offsuit. Good news though Porkens, depending on how he responds, can change my mind into expecting a ClarkBar/Looker duo.
Your assumptions are confusing me. I also think it's weird that you went from "I don't understand what Looker means" to "Looker is being purposefully 'nonsensical'" without any input from me.
In post 966, JamSV wrote:
Spoiler:
In post 953, TheThirteenthJT wrote:VOTE: 72offsuit

I disagree with those feeling 72 is town after that turn. I explained the reasons for the opposite Day 1.

Clark and Raya are still some of my favorites and Battle Mage is now also suspect to me.

Jamesv is weird...

No thoughts on Looker yet. Most of my thinking is still based off Homuras play which I will revisit.

Current areadlist scum to less scum.
72 confident here.
Raya
Clark
battle mage
Looker
Jamsv

I see a few potential scum pairings too.
72 and Clark or BM and Clark. I have no pairing for Raya currently.

Quick thoughts, I'm tired tonight and will check back in tomorrow.
I have to disagree, with 72 and Clark scumteam, and suggest Clark + Looker instead.
VOTE: ClarkBar
JamSV/Raya

  • Flip preferences: 24% JamSV | 22% Raya | 19% Battle Mage | 18% ThirteenthJT | 9% ClarkBar | 8% 72offsuit
    • Jams's imgur post shows he voteparked a town slot and has avoided suspicion all game.
  • I think it's interesting that this is a newbie game, but there are like no newbies.
  • That was kind of a low blow - "His reads don't tend to be particularly accurate in general". My reads are as accurate as anybody else's.
VOTE: JamSV
User avatar
JamSV
JamSV
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
JamSV
Goon
Goon
Posts: 621
Joined: June 17, 2020
Location: England

Post Post #969 (ISO) » Sun Jul 12, 2020 4:44 am

Post by JamSV »

In post 968, Looker wrote:
In post 753, JamSV wrote:
Spoiler:
In post 746, Looker wrote:
In post 683, Porkens wrote:Looker replaced Homura: Lurky as fuck. How can I read this?
I'm not lurky, you just have nothing better to do with your time. You made 72 posts in the course of a day. I have things to do, a job, and an occupation where I don't have access to my phone.
Flip preferences: 29% Porkens | 20% JamSV | 16% Raya | 14% ThirteenthJT or LicketyQuick | 12% Battle Mage | 9% 72offsuit | 0% ClarkBar


I've been working longer hours so I'm more irritated by the time I get home. Sorry. LuckyLuciano is not a bad person. His fakeclaim and AtE are still scummy, though.
Okay so important question, I'm going to assume, that it is in order of scum likeliness, such that the higher percentage we have, the scummier we are. In that regards, why is Clark 0%, a perfect town read, I find it interesting given none of us have him as our strongest town read. Can we interpret it as mason buddies / scum buddies, as realistically, even if I was convinced Battle Mage was the towniest town that town has ever seen, there's still a chance something could change and I'd want to remove him, the 0% seems suspicious if we consider % by scum likeliness.

If we consider % instead by removing based off of scum likeliness + you liking their play style, I think the 0% on Clark and the 9% on A9offsuit makes less sense. I'd like an explanation on 72offsuit's if that's the case.

As such, instead of leaving this up to interpretation what %s represent and why you have the numbers, could you care to order us by scum likeliness?
I don't understand which words you were trying to put in my mouth. Either way, you didn't wait for my explanation before you hammered.
In post 773, JamSV wrote:I decided to do a bit of work for Looker, because I was curious. Based off of mod's vote count posts because I'm too lazy to go through 30 pages. Thank you Nahdia.
Table of who voted for whom voted for whom:
https://imgur.com/Cv3ZhUu idk how to include images into a post properly.

A bunch of logic stuff, read if you want, but it's in a spoiler if you don't want to.
Spoiler:
Now as we know, Looker gave Clark a 0% chance to be scum based off of who voted him, and who he voted for. He voted for Looker himself, and Porkens. Obviously he will treat himself as town, that means voting for Porkens does not make you scum at all, meaning Looker scum reads Porkens.

By those standards, myself, LicketyQuickety, and Raya36 should have lower %s by his standards. That isn't the case though. Meaning, those who voted for us, make us scum. In my case, based off of Mod vote counts, nobody has voted for me, yet I'm the 2nd highest to be scum for it, weird. This is strike 1 for his post being nonsensical.

Raya was voted for by TTJT and 72os, and voted Porkens and LicketyQuickety, from this we can assume Looker town reads TTJT, 72os, and LicketyQuickety. However based off of the percentages for me, Raya, lickety, and TTJT, this makes no sense again. This is strike 2 for his post being nonsensical.

LicketyQuickety voted for Battle Mage, Porkens, 72, and TTJT, well, we just worked out TTJT and 72 were town, and a vote on porkens gave ClarkBar a 0%, so this implies Battle Mage is scum. This is strike 3 for his post being nonsensical.


Basically, what the spoiler says is, its nonsense, I could explain more but I got bored. I felt like proving his post about how he got his %s was just a lie. I really would like to see his read list on everybody, doesn't necessarily need an explanation, I'd also like an explanation between the 0% on Clark because his explanation was nonsense, and on the 9% for 72offsuit. Good news though Porkens, depending on how he responds, can change my mind into expecting a ClarkBar/Looker duo.
Your assumptions are confusing me. I also think it's weird that you went from "I don't understand what Looker means" to "Looker is being purposefully 'nonsensical'" without any input from me.
In post 966, JamSV wrote:
Spoiler:
In post 953, TheThirteenthJT wrote:VOTE: 72offsuit

I disagree with those feeling 72 is town after that turn. I explained the reasons for the opposite Day 1.

Clark and Raya are still some of my favorites and Battle Mage is now also suspect to me.

Jamesv is weird...

No thoughts on Looker yet. Most of my thinking is still based off Homuras play which I will revisit.

Current areadlist scum to less scum.
72 confident here.
Raya
Clark
battle mage
Looker
Jamsv

I see a few potential scum pairings too.
72 and Clark or BM and Clark. I have no pairing for Raya currently.

Quick thoughts, I'm tired tonight and will check back in tomorrow.
I have to disagree, with 72 and Clark scumteam, and suggest Clark + Looker instead.
VOTE: ClarkBar
JamSV/Raya

  • Flip preferences: 24% JamSV | 22% Raya | 19% Battle Mage | 18% ThirteenthJT | 9% ClarkBar | 8% 72offsuit
    • Jams's imgur post shows he voteparked a town slot and has avoided suspicion all game.
  • I think it's interesting that this is a newbie game, but there are like no newbies.
  • That was kind of a low blow - "His reads don't tend to be particularly accurate in general". My reads are as accurate as anybody else's.
VOTE: JamSV
You had plenty of time, not to mention I was more than willing to have waited for an extra 24 hours for the day to go on, but TTJT and Clark both had intent to hammer, if you're going to have a go at somebody for not giving you time to explain, look at Clark and TTJT, I at least managed to salvage an extra page of posts for town.
User avatar
TheThirteenthJT
TheThirteenthJT
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
TheThirteenthJT
Goon
Goon
Posts: 366
Joined: May 25, 2020

Post Post #970 (ISO) » Sun Jul 12, 2020 4:45 am

Post by TheThirteenthJT »

In post 968, Looker wrote:
In post 753, JamSV wrote:
Spoiler:
In post 746, Looker wrote:
In post 683, Porkens wrote:Looker replaced Homura: Lurky as fuck. How can I read this?
I'm not lurky, you just have nothing better to do with your time. You made 72 posts in the course of a day. I have things to do, a job, and an occupation where I don't have access to my phone.
Flip preferences: 29% Porkens | 20% JamSV | 16% Raya | 14% ThirteenthJT or LicketyQuick | 12% Battle Mage | 9% 72offsuit | 0% ClarkBar


I've been working longer hours so I'm more irritated by the time I get home. Sorry. LuckyLuciano is not a bad person. His fakeclaim and AtE are still scummy, though.
Okay so important question, I'm going to assume, that it is in order of scum likeliness, such that the higher percentage we have, the scummier we are. In that regards, why is Clark 0%, a perfect town read, I find it interesting given none of us have him as our strongest town read. Can we interpret it as mason buddies / scum buddies, as realistically, even if I was convinced Battle Mage was the towniest town that town has ever seen, there's still a chance something could change and I'd want to remove him, the 0% seems suspicious if we consider % by scum likeliness.

If we consider % instead by removing based off of scum likeliness + you liking their play style, I think the 0% on Clark and the 9% on A9offsuit makes less sense. I'd like an explanation on 72offsuit's if that's the case.

As such, instead of leaving this up to interpretation what %s represent and why you have the numbers, could you care to order us by scum likeliness?
I don't understand which words you were trying to put in my mouth. Either way, you didn't wait for my explanation before you hammered.
In post 773, JamSV wrote:I decided to do a bit of work for Looker, because I was curious. Based off of mod's vote count posts because I'm too lazy to go through 30 pages. Thank you Nahdia.
Table of who voted for whom voted for whom:
https://imgur.com/Cv3ZhUu idk how to include images into a post properly.

A bunch of logic stuff, read if you want, but it's in a spoiler if you don't want to.
Spoiler:
Now as we know, Looker gave Clark a 0% chance to be scum based off of who voted him, and who he voted for. He voted for Looker himself, and Porkens. Obviously he will treat himself as town, that means voting for Porkens does not make you scum at all, meaning Looker scum reads Porkens.

By those standards, myself, LicketyQuickety, and Raya36 should have lower %s by his standards. That isn't the case though. Meaning, those who voted for us, make us scum. In my case, based off of Mod vote counts, nobody has voted for me, yet I'm the 2nd highest to be scum for it, weird. This is strike 1 for his post being nonsensical.

Raya was voted for by TTJT and 72os, and voted Porkens and LicketyQuickety, from this we can assume Looker town reads TTJT, 72os, and LicketyQuickety. However based off of the percentages for me, Raya, lickety, and TTJT, this makes no sense again. This is strike 2 for his post being nonsensical.

LicketyQuickety voted for Battle Mage, Porkens, 72, and TTJT, well, we just worked out TTJT and 72 were town, and a vote on porkens gave ClarkBar a 0%, so this implies Battle Mage is scum. This is strike 3 for his post being nonsensical.


Basically, what the spoiler says is, its nonsense, I could explain more but I got bored. I felt like proving his post about how he got his %s was just a lie. I really would like to see his read list on everybody, doesn't necessarily need an explanation, I'd also like an explanation between the 0% on Clark because his explanation was nonsense, and on the 9% for 72offsuit. Good news though Porkens, depending on how he responds, can change my mind into expecting a ClarkBar/Looker duo.
Your assumptions are confusing me. I also think it's weird that you went from "I don't understand what Looker means" to "Looker is being purposefully 'nonsensical'" without any input from me.
In post 966, JamSV wrote:
Spoiler:
In post 953, TheThirteenthJT wrote:VOTE: 72offsuit

I disagree with those feeling 72 is town after that turn. I explained the reasons for the opposite Day 1.

Clark and Raya are still some of my favorites and Battle Mage is now also suspect to me.

Jamesv is weird...

No thoughts on Looker yet. Most of my thinking is still based off Homuras play which I will revisit.

Current areadlist scum to less scum.
72 confident here.
Raya
Clark
battle mage
Looker
Jamsv

I see a few potential scum pairings too.
72 and Clark or BM and Clark. I have no pairing for Raya currently.

Quick thoughts, I'm tired tonight and will check back in tomorrow.
I have to disagree, with 72 and Clark scumteam, and suggest Clark + Looker instead.
VOTE: ClarkBar
JamSV/Raya

  • Flip preferences: 24% JamSV | 22% Raya | 19% Battle Mage | 18% ThirteenthJT | 9% ClarkBar | 8% 72offsuit
    • Jams's imgur post shows he voteparked a town slot and has avoided suspicion all game.
  • I think it's interesting that this is a newbie game, but there are like no newbies.
  • That was kind of a low blow - "His reads don't tend to be particularly accurate in general". My reads are as accurate as anybody else's.
VOTE: JamSV
Would you go Raya over Jamsv?
User avatar
JamSV
JamSV
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
JamSV
Goon
Goon
Posts: 621
Joined: June 17, 2020
Location: England

Post Post #971 (ISO) » Sun Jul 12, 2020 4:50 am

Post by JamSV »

In post 968, Looker wrote:
In post 753, JamSV wrote:
Spoiler:
In post 746, Looker wrote:
In post 683, Porkens wrote:Looker replaced Homura: Lurky as fuck. How can I read this?
I'm not lurky, you just have nothing better to do with your time. You made 72 posts in the course of a day. I have things to do, a job, and an occupation where I don't have access to my phone.
Flip preferences: 29% Porkens | 20% JamSV | 16% Raya | 14% ThirteenthJT or LicketyQuick | 12% Battle Mage | 9% 72offsuit | 0% ClarkBar


I've been working longer hours so I'm more irritated by the time I get home. Sorry. LuckyLuciano is not a bad person. His fakeclaim and AtE are still scummy, though.
Okay so important question, I'm going to assume, that it is in order of scum likeliness, such that the higher percentage we have, the scummier we are. In that regards, why is Clark 0%, a perfect town read, I find it interesting given none of us have him as our strongest town read. Can we interpret it as mason buddies / scum buddies, as realistically, even if I was convinced Battle Mage was the towniest town that town has ever seen, there's still a chance something could change and I'd want to remove him, the 0% seems suspicious if we consider % by scum likeliness.

If we consider % instead by removing based off of scum likeliness + you liking their play style, I think the 0% on Clark and the 9% on A9offsuit makes less sense. I'd like an explanation on 72offsuit's if that's the case.

As such, instead of leaving this up to interpretation what %s represent and why you have the numbers, could you care to order us by scum likeliness?
I don't understand which words you were trying to put in my mouth. Either way, you didn't wait for my explanation before you hammered.
In post 773, JamSV wrote:I decided to do a bit of work for Looker, because I was curious. Based off of mod's vote count posts because I'm too lazy to go through 30 pages. Thank you Nahdia.
Table of who voted for whom voted for whom:
https://imgur.com/Cv3ZhUu idk how to include images into a post properly.

A bunch of logic stuff, read if you want, but it's in a spoiler if you don't want to.
Spoiler:
Now as we know, Looker gave Clark a 0% chance to be scum based off of who voted him, and who he voted for. He voted for Looker himself, and Porkens. Obviously he will treat himself as town, that means voting for Porkens does not make you scum at all, meaning Looker scum reads Porkens.

By those standards, myself, LicketyQuickety, and Raya36 should have lower %s by his standards. That isn't the case though. Meaning, those who voted for us, make us scum. In my case, based off of Mod vote counts, nobody has voted for me, yet I'm the 2nd highest to be scum for it, weird. This is strike 1 for his post being nonsensical.

Raya was voted for by TTJT and 72os, and voted Porkens and LicketyQuickety, from this we can assume Looker town reads TTJT, 72os, and LicketyQuickety. However based off of the percentages for me, Raya, lickety, and TTJT, this makes no sense again. This is strike 2 for his post being nonsensical.

LicketyQuickety voted for Battle Mage, Porkens, 72, and TTJT, well, we just worked out TTJT and 72 were town, and a vote on porkens gave ClarkBar a 0%, so this implies Battle Mage is scum. This is strike 3 for his post being nonsensical.


Basically, what the spoiler says is, its nonsense, I could explain more but I got bored. I felt like proving his post about how he got his %s was just a lie. I really would like to see his read list on everybody, doesn't necessarily need an explanation, I'd also like an explanation between the 0% on Clark because his explanation was nonsense, and on the 9% for 72offsuit. Good news though Porkens, depending on how he responds, can change my mind into expecting a ClarkBar/Looker duo.
Your assumptions are confusing me. I also think it's weird that you went from "I don't understand what Looker means" to "Looker is being purposefully 'nonsensical'" without any input from me.
In post 966, JamSV wrote:
Spoiler:
In post 953, TheThirteenthJT wrote:VOTE: 72offsuit

I disagree with those feeling 72 is town after that turn. I explained the reasons for the opposite Day 1.

Clark and Raya are still some of my favorites and Battle Mage is now also suspect to me.

Jamesv is weird...

No thoughts on Looker yet. Most of my thinking is still based off Homuras play which I will revisit.

Current areadlist scum to less scum.
72 confident here.
Raya
Clark
battle mage
Looker
Jamsv

I see a few potential scum pairings too.
72 and Clark or BM and Clark. I have no pairing for Raya currently.

Quick thoughts, I'm tired tonight and will check back in tomorrow.
I have to disagree, with 72 and Clark scumteam, and suggest Clark + Looker instead.
VOTE: ClarkBar
JamSV/Raya

  • Flip preferences: 24% JamSV | 22% Raya | 19% Battle Mage | 18% ThirteenthJT | 9% ClarkBar | 8% 72offsuit
    • Jams's imgur post shows he voteparked a town slot and has avoided suspicion all game.
  • I think it's interesting that this is a newbie game, but there are like no newbies.
  • That was kind of a low blow - "His reads don't tend to be particularly accurate in general". My reads are as accurate as anybody else's.
VOTE: JamSV
EBWOP, the game was also started to progress towards the Porkens hammer regardless. With regards to vote parking a town slot, 6 people were okay with a Porkens hammer and you think you have a valid point? The majority of us scum read him. Additionally, how on earth can you say openly that I'm putting words into your mouth, I asked for you to explain things in both, if I were putting words into your mouth I wouldn't bother. Similarly why on earth did you include my post saying I think you and Clark are more likely to be scum partners than Clark and 72. I get people hate OMGUS and such, but you including that quote literally devalued everything you said, you've literally demonstrated with it that you're voting me because I suspect you and Clark.
User avatar
JamSV
JamSV
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
JamSV
Goon
Goon
Posts: 621
Joined: June 17, 2020
Location: England

Post Post #972 (ISO) » Sun Jul 12, 2020 5:06 am

Post by JamSV »

@Looker, while we are at it, now that you're responding, why don't you actually address the issues people had with your percentage post? Similarly, why not address how the order has changed for ClarkBar and 72offsuit in your new percentage post. Additionally, what post stopped ClarkBar being 0% and took him to 9%. I can guarantee with pretty high odds, that the only reason he is no longer 0 is because people have started to suspect him. So what will you do Looker? Drop the bad cases you have against people, actually attempt with a read and explanations, or keep going balls to the walls with aggression but with no explanation or backbone? I can tell you what would be best for you and town, which would be explaining. You replaced into the game rather late, as such you've had plenty of time to read over the game, and should have one of the freshest outlooks on the game. I look forward to you being helpful for town and explaining yourself, or for you to give me more ammunition for a scum case against you.
UNVOTE: ClarkBar
VOTE: Looker
User avatar
72offsuit
72offsuit
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
72offsuit
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3465
Joined: December 28, 2019
Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder

Post Post #973 (ISO) » Sun Jul 12, 2020 5:20 am

Post by 72offsuit »

Jam, keep your eye on the prize.
Clark is scum.
Looker is a distraction.
User avatar
72offsuit
72offsuit
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
72offsuit
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3465
Joined: December 28, 2019
Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder

Post Post #974 (ISO) » Sun Jul 12, 2020 5:22 am

Post by 72offsuit »

In post 962, Raya36 wrote:
In post 943, Battle Mage wrote:jesus christ. i'm alive and all my suspects are dead
and town
. :facepalm:

initial thoughts: Jam-scum wouldn't have made that weird play yesterday around the Porkens wagon. Too conspicuous and odd for no reason.
Raya's posts at end of day had conviction and didn't leave herself open to a Porkens town-flip. Felt legit.
Must be at least 1 scum on the Porkens wagon because there was no reason not to be, therefore must be TTJT and/or Looker.
need to revisit 72offsuit as i think i basically locktowned him based on pork being scum.
I may be biased but 72 has been really aggressively pushing me and the reasoning doesnt all feel that great
I'm not even voting for you. If you are town you are playing horribly.
Locked