Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2020 10:26 am
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
Uhh, no I didn't. You brought up claiming hoods so it would make your role make sense.In post 952, Tayl0r Swift wrote:ok and im back to having enigma as scum. you outed me as PR and there were better ways of getting everyone to claim whether they were in a PT. you also didnt answer the question about whether you are ascetic. VOTE: enigma
In post 897, Tayl0r Swift wrote:at this point it may be helpful for everyone to claim whether or not they are in a neighborhood. no need to claim neighbors, but it would be very helpful for me to understand my role. i can claim/explain everything or at least something based on what people say.
For reference.In post 912, RCEnigma wrote:Since we're making assumptions.
Assumption 1: frog is in a hood
Assumption 2: this game is not 9-4
Assumption 3: I can end this game by day 3 potentially.
I'm a PT cop and have a result on someone that is not frog/walter/Italiano.
This is definitely not a new scum v new scum interaction.In post 232, BananaCucho wrote:Can you do me a favorIn post 231, SJReaver wrote:He has a sparse posting style and doesn't engage in much of the back-and-forth other posters do that make them sticky* in other's minds. He's poor at defending himself because he tends to remain calm and level-headed. His reads are average but he's not the best at making a case, so other town posters tend to value him less.In post 225, BananaCucho wrote:This is helpful info. Is there a reason you can put your finger onto why Woolter seems to be scum read a lot?In post 215, SJReaver wrote:Walter has been scum read in every game I've seen him play. The man has a flair for being miseliminated.
No updated VC, I see. Give me time to see what you've been up to and find out how easy it is to slip under the radar.
In the first game I played with him, it was the end of D1 and we were one vote away from eliminating Walter. He came off as being okay with it. The reason we caught scum was that rolling him was so nice and easy, they made a 'jokey' post that obvscum mindset.
If it's not clear, I'm currently townreading him. Because of the consistency in his playstyle, I'll probably lock that in for D1 and then revisit it D2 when we have a flip and I can see how he positions himself.
*It's somewhat tangential, but group psychology often favors people who provoke any sort of emotional reaction, even slightly negative ones.
Can you carry me in your enormously giant townie backpack to victory?
I'm not sure this is a sufficient explanation of why you made the fakeclaim.In post 951, RCEnigma wrote:While that is a lot of power that I definitely could have pushed a lynch through with.
I'm retracting my claim. @Taylor I'm not really gunning for you any more I think your reaction was pretty genuine, interesting you brought up the ascetic modifier because I do believe scum to be ascetic or Walter is just scum.
Mostly this was to prevent wiggle room for scum in the worst case and force a head to head in the best.
Doesn't change my position that burning off wagon probably ends the game.
I assume this is still valid, given that it was made before RCEnigma's post?In post 897, Tayl0r Swift wrote:at this point it may be helpful for everyone to claim whether or not they are in a neighborhood. no need to claim neighbors, but it would be very helpful for me to understand my role. i can claim/explain everything or at least something based on what people say.
Is this statement why Nosferatu suddenly voted me with no reason?In post 953, RCEnigma wrote:Going on VC's alone I'd probably go CFJ today. For CFJ to be town AND have banana NOT position themselves on wagon would require an sjreaver + nos team.
youre voting for someone in the middle of your readlist?In post 958, Nosferatu wrote:{italiano, frogster}
{ts, walter, rce}
{looker, gamma, geraint}
{cfg}
{raya}
where im at right now
VOTE: looker
does this look like a distancing play from inexperienced scum to anyone?
interesting choice for rvs vote. nothing really by itself, but does anyone know if scum are more or less likely to RVS vote their buddy? its just interesting that this vote is on one of my top scumreads.
this struck me. its either lazy scum struggling to find reasons to scumread anyone, or its an attempt to defend a buddy. i actually lean towards the former, which vindicates looker somewhat.
chainsaw defense of nosIn post 218, BananaCucho wrote:In post 180, Frogsterking wrote:VOTE: Nosferatu
I'm not buying the sobriety excuse because I'm town and posting anyway right now. Nosferatu's post seems a little lurky and overconcerned. Like he thinks he can get away with it for an ML or two.
COJ seems overly concerned with Not_Mafia. I feel like he would be able to think more critically if he stopped mentioning Not_Mafia.
COJ and Not_Mafia nominated themselves for town leader and town "anti-town" and seem well suited for their roles respectively.
WaltertheDunce10 seems like he likes Twitter or LinkedIn or both.In post 181, Frogsterking wrote:Nosferatu seems like he's trying to lurk and be overreactive and get town read for it by being hipster. Like Nosferatu is saying to himself "I have two or three other scum buddies, it's D1, nothing really to do, let me just throw this out there."Tbh this vote feels like a pretty bad excuse for a vote. And the reaction feels forced.In post 182, Frogsterking wrote:I feel like Nosferatu if he flipped town would just post some filler there instead of explaining that he couldn't post filler because he's drunk.
Like you really think a guy who took the time to upload an animated avatar of some movie star consuming a cigar or joint or whatever the fuck that is would feel too self-aware to post some filler because he's been drinking?
VOTE: Frogsterking
You haven't answered my questions.
Could you clarify the second sentence here? I don't understand what you mean.In post 962, Looker wrote:I'm finding it difficult to trust the subjective nature of Tayl0r's posts. Especially since her overconfidence in RCE has fell through.
gotta sort them somehow i dont think any more pressure on cfj is doing anythingIn post 964, Tayl0r Swift wrote:youre voting for someone in the middle of your readlist?In post 958, Nosferatu wrote:{italiano, frogster}
{ts, walter, rce}
{looker, gamma, geraint}
{cfj}
{raya}
where im at right now
VOTE: looker
{town}In post 962, Looker wrote:Can anyone interpret Nosferatu's readslist and explain to me why he's voting me over Raya? (Or voting me at all)
It's based mainly on my scumread of them both. However cfj cases Walter in 869 which makes me feel like there's one between the two but not both.In post 928, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why this, exactly?In post 871, Raya36 wrote:I feel like there's a pretty good chance scum is between cfj or Walter though
so youre saying youre voting a null slot over a scum slot?In post 971, Nosferatu wrote:{town}In post 962, Looker wrote:Can anyone interpret Nosferatu's readslist and explain to me why he's voting me over Raya? (Or voting me at all)
{nulltown}
{null}
{nullscum}
{scum}