I'd vote him but MWB still hasn't apologized for causing the death of poor Eliza yet.
Idk about "too sweet" but his Nahdia push ain't great
@DS that seems fair, it's less about pushing people you think are shady and more about sorting people who you can read but don't have a read on
I personally think that pushing people because you want them lynched is a shitty strategy. It doesn't actually get scum, and instead just gets people who are unsure of their footing.
I push people because I want something set in stone that I can refer to at a later point.
Pedit: ooh pagetop
“Why was I chosen?'
'Such questions cannot be answered,' said Gandalf. 'You may be sure that it was not for any merit that others do not possess. But you have been chosen, and you must therefore use such strength and heart and wits as you have.”
In post 944, SirCakez wrote:You think Cabd's playstyle was specifically to get you involved?
The whole thing where he was so hesitant to reveal the reasoning for the Bell SR despite being convicted about it reeked for one. Also like I've said some of his humourous posting (like the one I quoted on pg 36) seems to be trying to look good.
No. I was positing the possible why's that I think was more plausible for why he asked me specifically what I thought of his reads. I don't think he was seeking approval or validation. I do think he was trying to get a read on me if he didn't have a read already.
I think the other things that DS pointed out were play style/personality.
In post 463, Nahdia wrote:so i wont have time to catch up until later tonight, but here's some content to read me on
i maintain 33 is a bad look. that kind of perspective-discerning logic always reads super ingenuine to me, and while it can come from town, i think scum are likely to throw it out because it's one of those "technically correct" points. that said, obviously there's a lot more content from that slot with which to read now, so my read may well change
didnt really get anything from peta's vote on me or the subsequent reactions, at least at first glance.
In post 66, Cabd wrote:I'm not fond of that type of pizza.
Noted!
Now. Why me before Syr?
You're scarier. And you're around! I feel like I'll know pretty quickly if Syr's town. He and I have some of the same weaknesses as scum, especially interacting with each other.
This post stands out to me. Are you holding your cards close to your chest here until you get a read or would you care to elaborate?
was liking midway but this post just... doesn't make sense in context. not sure what to make of it, but @midway i wanna know more about what was going through your head when you voted alisae here.
In post 186, midwaybear wrote:I don't get the point and I don't see the problem yet. I really doubt scum!Jake is going to come out of the game posting votecounts instead of trying to form connections with other people.
your defense of your partner is noted
am I doing it right peta?
this is also a bad look. feels very much like a post i would make as scum, though if people disagree that it's a generally scummy post i might just be projecting a bit too much. feedback welcome.
glad to see peta's "obvious townread" was the one i also felt was obvious (midwaybear)! unless he got bear town after he made that earlier post about having one townread which was obvious.
kinda liked 216. alisae is slightly leaning town at this point.
and now im at page 10!
Gamma I'm mainly going off these two posts. Seem very half-hearted (Nahdia admitted to this) and kind of reminds me of catch-ups I used to post as scum
In post 944, SirCakez wrote:You think Cabd's playstyle was specifically to get you involved?
The whole thing where he was so hesitant to reveal the reasoning for the Bell SR despite being convicted about it reeked for one. Also like I've said some of his humourous posting (like the one I quoted on pg 36) seems to be trying to look good.
No. I was positing the possible why's that I think was more plausible for why he asked me specifically what I thought of his reads. I don't think he was seeking approval or validation. I do think he was trying to get a read on me if he didn't have a read already.
I think the other things that DS pointed out were play style/personality.
Oh I see you were referring to DS's case specifically
What do you think about my more general argument that Cabd is using his playstyle and humor to avoid posting more serious content?
In post 944, SirCakez wrote:You think Cabd's playstyle was specifically to get you involved?
The whole thing where he was so hesitant to reveal the reasoning for the Bell SR despite being convicted about it reeked for one. Also like I've said some of his humourous posting (like the one I quoted on pg 36) seems to be trying to look good.
No. I was positing the possible why's that I think was more plausible for why he asked me specifically what I thought of his reads. I don't think he was seeking approval or validation. I do think he was trying to get a read on me if he didn't have a read already.
I think the other things that DS pointed out were play style/personality.
Oh I see you were referring to DS's case specifically
What do you think about my more general argument that Cabd is using his playstyle and humor to avoid posting more serious content?
That one is entirely possible. I'm not sure that I agree that's the case, but I can see where you're coming from. I liked the dream thing, though I want to go back and read it again. So, I like it, but it doesn't mean town to me. Ffery has a town read on him, and I'm taking that into consideration with my read because I believe* she can read him better than I can. But I've only seen him as scum once.
*This is also dependent upon me getting a town read on ffery that I feel really comfortable with.
I don't know how to approach the relationship between this group Tammy which is kind of what I was getting at with the bias thing - I feel like you guys want to townread each other because you're all friends.
In post 928, DiamondSentinel wrote:(and yes, these are all not in this game, but I'm deliberate about using people not in this game, lest I be wrong and eat my words)
lol
are there any people in the game who would fit into the categories you're describing?
Shame on a martyr claiming friends
From either perspective of &
In post 932, DiamondSentinel wrote:But I regularly write paragraphs because that's what I need to get my point across. Not everyone shitposts their way to LyLo. Some of us play the game and speak eloquently.
There's a middle ground :X
Shame on a martyr claiming friends
From either perspective of &
In post 463, Nahdia wrote:so i wont have time to catch up until later tonight, but here's some content to read me on
i maintain 33 is a bad look. that kind of perspective-discerning logic always reads super ingenuine to me, and while it can come from town, i think scum are likely to throw it out because it's one of those "technically correct" points. that said, obviously there's a lot more content from that slot with which to read now, so my read may well change
didnt really get anything from peta's vote on me or the subsequent reactions, at least at first glance.
In post 66, Cabd wrote:I'm not fond of that type of pizza.
Noted!
Now. Why me before Syr?
You're scarier. And you're around! I feel like I'll know pretty quickly if Syr's town. He and I have some of the same weaknesses as scum, especially interacting with each other.
This post stands out to me. Are you holding your cards close to your chest here until you get a read or would you care to elaborate?
was liking midway but this post just... doesn't make sense in context. not sure what to make of it, but @midway i wanna know more about what was going through your head when you voted alisae here.
In post 186, midwaybear wrote:I don't get the point and I don't see the problem yet. I really doubt scum!Jake is going to come out of the game posting votecounts instead of trying to form connections with other people.
your defense of your partner is noted
am I doing it right peta?
this is also a bad look. feels very much like a post i would make as scum, though if people disagree that it's a generally scummy post i might just be projecting a bit too much. feedback welcome.
glad to see peta's "obvious townread" was the one i also felt was obvious (midwaybear)! unless he got bear town after he made that earlier post about having one townread which was obvious.
kinda liked 216. alisae is slightly leaning town at this point.
and now im at page 10!
Gamma I'm mainly going off these two posts. Seem very half-hearted (Nahdia admitted to this) and kind of reminds me of catch-ups I used to post as scum
You know what, I actually see it now. She seems to want to be townread for minimal solving. VOTE: Nahdia
We're falling through space, you and me, clinging to the skin of this tiny little world, and if we let go...That's who I am.
"I can't even look at the game anymore.
That evil teddy bear has got everyone twirling by his thumb.
It's like witnessing an slow but unavoidable train crash you can't stop."
-Norwee
"Please refrain from diverting our sleuths out there Pooky."
~Maple
"I can't even look at the game anymore.
That evil teddy bear has got everyone twirling by his thumb.
It's like witnessing an slow but unavoidable train crash you can't stop."
-Norwee
"Please refrain from diverting our sleuths out there Pooky."
~Maple
"I can't even look at the game anymore.
That evil teddy bear has got everyone twirling by his thumb.
It's like witnessing an slow but unavoidable train crash you can't stop."
-Norwee
"Please refrain from diverting our sleuths out there Pooky."
~Maple
So I don't remember what my thing I was doing for the RP catchup was (probably due to only really ever doing that RP while in a specific location a lot of the time) so I'll just not do it. I'm sure someone's happy.
In post 463, Nahdia wrote:so i wont have time to catch up until later tonight, but here's some content to read me on
i maintain 33 is a bad look. that kind of perspective-discerning logic always reads super ingenuine to me, and while it can come from town, i think scum are likely to throw it out because it's one of those "technically correct" points. that said, obviously there's a lot more content from that slot with which to read now, so my read may well change
didnt really get anything from peta's vote on me or the subsequent reactions, at least at first glance.
In post 66, Cabd wrote:I'm not fond of that type of pizza.
Noted!
Now. Why me before Syr?
You're scarier. And you're around! I feel like I'll know pretty quickly if Syr's town. He and I have some of the same weaknesses as scum, especially interacting with each other.
This post stands out to me. Are you holding your cards close to your chest here until you get a read or would you care to elaborate?
was liking midway but this post just... doesn't make sense in context. not sure what to make of it, but @midway i wanna know more about what was going through your head when you voted alisae here.
In post 186, midwaybear wrote:I don't get the point and I don't see the problem yet. I really doubt scum!Jake is going to come out of the game posting votecounts instead of trying to form connections with other people.
your defense of your partner is noted
am I doing it right peta?
this is also a bad look. feels very much like a post i would make as scum, though if people disagree that it's a generally scummy post i might just be projecting a bit too much. feedback welcome.
glad to see peta's "obvious townread" was the one i also felt was obvious (midwaybear)! unless he got bear town after he made that earlier post about having one townread which was obvious.
kinda liked 216. alisae is slightly leaning town at this point.
and now im at page 10!
Gamma I'm mainly going off these two posts. Seem very half-hearted (Nahdia admitted to this) and kind of reminds me of catch-ups I used to post as scum
You know what, I actually see it now. She seems to want to be townread for minimal solving. VOTE: Nahdia
How are you gonna SR for my push on Nahdia and change your mind this easily?
Something_Smart wrote:
In post 952, SirCakez wrote:Seem very half-hearted (Nahdia admitted to this)
