Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:21 am
LOL I'm 100% gonna use this strat as scum cause yall are refusing to take me out!!In post 953, Battle Mage wrote:see i kinda feel like maybe Superbowl is being charitable to town here, by giving us a free scum-elim, cause he knows we're fked.
THIS IS NOT TRUE ISO MEIn post 955, Rannygazoo wrote:He’s not giving us reads because he knows he’s caught and he doesn’t want to give us ammo to find the rest of his team.
In post 205, Titus wrote:I think Ranny v Superbowl might be S v T or T v S.
I can’t explain it but Titus getting a fruit/claiming to get a fruit then follow up posts makes her more likely to be scum.In post 315, Titus wrote:I got fruit.
VOTE: Superbowl
Him, Nom, or Ranny are who I want to execute. Superbowl9 pushing for a policy lynch before we knew Ben's alignment was really bad.
Titus SB9 BM.In post 714, superbowl9 wrote:I'll claim because I'm not going to make much of an effort to shake the wagon off, I'm FV (gave to titus). I'm fine if you want to hammer as well, already pretty much said everything I wanted to about the game
Btw if I am right you should claim your neg utility now.In post 196, Flavor Leaf wrote:This had about 3 usages when I posted it earlier, and they'll come out sometime this game probably, but they're not actively that important. Just a way for me to get a read on some people.In post 194, Flavor Leaf wrote:Down to the negative utility claim.
Ascetic SK Serial Killer it Survivor here folks probably.In post 204, Flavor Leaf wrote:it's kind of a "look at what I'm doing not what I'm saying"
because I actively said I wasn't going to play, so that's the buzz line, right?
But look, I'm actively playing.
I do stuff like that for baiting purposes. I just like chaos.
I'm the definition of Chaotic Neutral.
What did this have to do with the quote you responded to?In post 861, MathBlade wrote:So you have 0 scumreads then?In post 859, Titus wrote:I have Flavor as obvtown now tooIn post 856, Titus wrote:My EoD 1 readsIn post 854, MathBlade wrote:Who do you define as “obvTown”?In post 853, Titus wrote:I've done a lot before. In practice, people rarely care about dead players reads. Anything is possible. I'm sure if things were brainstormed, we could come up with more reasons why scum may kill town with bad reads.
They generally don't, which is a point against superbowl. It would be much stronger if they didn't pass through obvtown to do it.
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p12359200
Going down to Andres was just weird.
My BM read plummeted and my SB read has somewhat improved to would execute but not really SRing him.
So your read wall is useless in case you flip. Because if you were obeying it you’d be on me or ranny and not BM. Again what changed in your reads?
Where’s your train?
In post 965, Flavor Leaf wrote:What did this have to do with the quote you responded to?In post 861, MathBlade wrote:So you have 0 scumreads then?In post 859, Titus wrote:I have Flavor as obvtown now tooIn post 856, Titus wrote:My EoD 1 readsIn post 854, MathBlade wrote:Who do you define as “obvTown”?In post 853, Titus wrote:I've done a lot before. In practice, people rarely care about dead players reads. Anything is possible. I'm sure if things were brainstormed, we could come up with more reasons why scum may kill town with bad reads.
They generally don't, which is a point against superbowl. It would be much stronger if they didn't pass through obvtown to do it.
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p12359200
Going down to Andres was just weird.
My BM read plummeted and my SB read has somewhat improved to would execute but not really SRing him.
So your read wall is useless in case you flip. Because if you were obeying it you’d be on me or ranny and not BM. Again what changed in your reads?
Where’s your train?
Also, damn, so many pages to catch up on haha
Then you don’t have a problem outing your neg util yeah?In post 967, Flavor Leaf wrote:You’re quoting a lot of my sarcastic posts that got taken more seriously than I expected them to, but energy stopped me from shutting the after effects down.
Wouldn’t you like to know.In post 969, MathBlade wrote:Then you don’t have a problem outing your neg util yeah?In post 967, Flavor Leaf wrote:You’re quoting a lot of my sarcastic posts that got taken more seriously than I expected them to, but energy stopped me from shutting the after effects down.
Are you talking about the SK?In post 961, MathBlade wrote:Btw if I am right you should claim your neg utility now.In post 196, Flavor Leaf wrote:This had about 3 usages when I posted it earlier, and they'll come out sometime this game probably, but they're not actively that important. Just a way for me to get a read on some people.In post 194, Flavor Leaf wrote:Down to the negative utility claim.
Just in case I am wrong on one of those three.