Mafiascum.net

Why does horse being town mean there have to be deep wolves?

The most likely scenario with horse is that scum were ok with her wagon stalling since no scum was threatened.

Problem is, there isn’t a good case on horse so scum hopping on the wagon have a hard time justifying it imo. Being the third person to jump on horse for saying she’s new to the site when she’s not new to mafia on page 3 looks pretty bad.

In post 786, MathBlade wrote:

In post 784, Toogeloo wrote:Math is one of those aggressive types that throws everything at the wall til something sticks. It's a bit abrasive and off putting, but at least the game is moving again, and will probably be interesting in some way in the future.

Meh I am aggressive because imho you were going to miselim a mason.

Since coming back from my hiatus I’ve tried to be less aggressive but an almost certain mason close to elim and a scum wagon right there. You gotta be aggressive and push it through.

im liking you as a hard TR from me.
I disagree with ur horse read. Aside from that I like ur take on the game very much.

In post 787, Flea The Magician wrote:Ok Christmas came early and someone bought me a new toy!! <3

lets see how he squeaks :3

VOTE: Math

*kicks flea*
hes not squeaky.

In post 789, Flea The Magician wrote:Also if there is masons (which I doubt), math is one of them or scum.

..........................?????????

In post 950, Infinity 324 wrote:Why does horse being town mean there have to be deep wolves?

The most likely scenario with horse is that scum were ok with her wagon stalling since no scum was threatened.

No one else has gotten more than three votes at the same time all game.

The votes don’t support your theory of scum being okay with it though. They’d at least be somewhat more clustered or combining on a second/third wagon.

Town had no cohesion except on Horse.
If horse is town then Nora (or someone as skilled as her) is scum.

In post 791, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 678, Horsewoman wrote:She's pretty much scumreading a bunch of inactives and townreading the players who are doing anything (this was already pointed out by vaxkiller). And posts like 481 are in my opinion, really terrible.

481 - link your goddamn posts.

PFFFFT jacko's face atm be like : -_______________________________________________________________-********

In post 796, JacksonVirgo wrote:If we have a vigilante, I recommend shooting in the low-posters to clear the null-tier. The scummy players and the townie players sort themselves out more or less where I've seen null tier stay null and loses us the game.

Vig should shoot either Toog, Infinity, or DGB.

In post 951, Infinity 324 wrote:Problem is, there isn’t a good case on horse so scum hopping on the wagon have a hard time justifying it imo. Being the third person to jump on horse for saying she’s new to the site when she’s not new to mafia on page 3 looks pretty bad.

Oh so if you’re scum then you thought you couldn’t vote her if Horse is town.

Scum have had plenty of opportunities. It seems odd they wouldn’t want Horse.

In post 957, Noraa wrote:

In post 796, JacksonVirgo wrote:If we have a vigilante, I recommend shooting in the low-posters to clear the null-tier. The scummy players and the townie players sort themselves out more or less where I've seen null tier stay null and loses us the game.

Vig should shoot either Toog, Infinity, or DGB.

If a vig exists shoot infinity.

We don't kill by post count otherwise I'd never die as scum considering my endless amount of posts. The more posts, the easier to get lost in them and the harder to sort honestly speaking.

Or if we don’t elim horse (which would be ridiculous) vote Horse

Evening all

13 pages since I went to bed last night - cripes :O

I will aim to have a quick read through tonight, although you may have to wait until the weekend proper for me to spend some decent time on this game as my mind is still kinda melted from the mad pre-christmas rush at work this week

--pedit 5 posts in literally the time it took me to say good evening. SMH.

--pedit 2. Stop. Posting. So. Fast.

In post 942, Noraa wrote:

In post 723, Guillotina wrote:I don't think she'd risk claiming Mason when nobody has claimed and risked getting counterclaimed by the actual Masons if they exist here.

... if she is a fake and

she is baiting real masons

and the real masons take the bait, that's like 1 for 2 from a scum perspective.
tho

normally scum try to bait out roles

like vig or cop I'll admit.

I believe the claim but ur reasoning for believing it are dumber than having no reason imo.

No! They never would try to outright bait for Masons in a themed game! LOL They would hunt for PRs ALWAYS!!!

Also, two Masons counterclaiming does not guarantee their demise during the night for a "1 for 2!" Are you for real!? They become town clears and PRs will confirm/protect/watch those town clears, hence why scum will not try to attack them on Night 1! You always protect the town clears over everyone else this early game! Get out of here!

So yah! I don't think she'd risk claiming Mason when nobody has claimed and risked getting counterclaimed by the actual Masons if they exist here still stands!

Good job at looking dumber while calling other people dumb.

In post 831, Vaxkiller wrote:VOTE: nora

hm.

In post 843, Vaxkiller wrote:Nora and Jackson Virgo's chummyness concerns me.

Cuz Jacko is one of my favorite people on site and we do this every single game. Do you need quotes or something?

In post 845, Vaxkiller wrote:I think nora!scum would be playing "safe" this game tho after their last scum game. Hence why they are out in left field on DGB.

why is that "safe"?????????

imagine trying to do a VC

In post 953, Noraa wrote:

In post 787, Flea The Magician wrote:Ok Christmas came early and someone bought me a new toy!! <3

lets see how he squeaks :3

VOTE: Math

*kicks flea*
hes not squeaky.

OWWIE!

In post 937, Noraa wrote:You just ignore the fact that someone claimed mason and toog decided to put them at E-1 right after?

Post #1: I'm <insert role here>, hahaha
Post#2: srs tho, <insert reason here>
Seemed legit.

Not sure how a wagon of 5 equals L-1, but I haven't taken 1st grade math in years, so I might need a refresher.

I'm all about wagons right now though, so I got where the votes take me. Like a leaf in the wind.

In post 861, Momrangal wrote:

In post 793, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 691, Momrangal wrote:I'm a mason hahahaha

Question, why would you out being a mason so quickly when it's much more beneficial to keep that claim back until a more strategical moment or at E-1 not when you're only just getting heat.

It was late, baby was fussy, I was heading to bed and I didnt trust town to not quick lynch, I mean....
And as far as Nora goes, she was never a comfort wagon. She was never a joke wagon, she was never a vanity wagon. She was the first serious push in the game and there was as a consensus of her being likely scum yet it stalled out early and weird as hell CW wagons took place, both of which moved much faster than hers

you now think I'm scum?

In post 868, Vaxkiller wrote:*shrug* Maybe scum is already on it. Maybe scum is scared to take a hard position (like nora on DGB).

why u so convinced I'm scum, vax?

In post 873, DrippingGoofball wrote:My position on Noraa is a lot harder than hers is on me, but for some reason everyone shrugs off all the scummy things she posts... I was cheering it when I was scum with her, but she's pulling the same trick in this game, but I'm town thus time and I'm not having it.

It's frustrating.

Hi scum!

In post 874, DrippingGoofball wrote:I missed the Mason claim. UNVOTE:

more like you dipped out and hoped someone would be stupid enough to lolhammer.

In post 875, MathBlade wrote:What scummy things do you mean?

+1