Mafiascum.net

In post 773, Almost50 wrote:

In post 315, redtea wrote:also there's daytalk

What's that got to do with anything??

good question

In post 947, Three wrote:

In post 807, Dwlee99 wrote:Beginning of ISO: doesn't say much. Doesn't interact much. First time involved in actual conversation happens to be when the mech convo with the traitor stuff comes up. Since then, not much to impress me except maybe the truce thing from y'all but I feel like I shouldn't put a ton of stock into it. The townread on me kinda feels like he knows it's true which is why he believes it cause Occam's is just scummy -> scum and I don't think he has played with me to know my playstyle just kinda is this. I think people new to my playstyle tend to scumread me naturally so it's kind of weird for him to actually townread me for thinking I look scummy

Pretty sure this is Dwlee99 who posted this.

Read what I wrote and read what you wrote again?

In post 948, Three wrote:I'd prefer if you just admitted you're death tunneling me,

because despite every single one of your concerns being addressed

, you still scum read me.

See, Dwlee, I read what you wrote. Your other concerns already got talked about and dealt with, which I mention here. So what problem do you have exactly, that hasn't already been refuted?

Dwele, feels like most of your argument of Three being scum is that he townread you? Assuming that new people scumread you naturally is a bad take and way to general to apply to everyone. Some people can think that playstyle is town indicative. Feels at this point you are just tunneling three because you are afraid to move off him or for the sake of having someone to push.

I think for me Cool cookie is the most scumread right now. Hence my vote on him. But Dwele is a scumread for me as well.

VOTE: cool cookie

I would say my 3 big scumreads right now are Cool, George and Dwele in that order. Just went through George's ISO and he has nothing of substance at all. I couldn't even find him scum or town reading anyone. He comes in with the most useless comments when he could just as easily just give us some of his thoughts about who he thinks is scum. For example:

In post 739, GeorgeBailey wrote:why the fuck am i being lumped in with zen and wake/a50.

He comes back after 2 days immedietly after being called out as scum and lumped in with other inactive players (myself included). Could be a coincidence that he chooses to come in right after being called out but it's still a bad look. Plus he is outraged about being called out when it was very reasonable given his inactivity. Yet he still dosen't give us anything, his only contribution is saying "good question" then being gone for hours again. When he comes back he posts this:

In post 805, GeorgeBailey wrote:

In post 801, fua wrote:What if it’s just 2 PRs and the traitor? No goons abound.

Very possible since there's multi tasking.

This was rightly called out by Jacket, since he chooses to comment on this when there is so much else better he could have taken a stance on. No scumreading, just a useless comment that dosen't say much to us. No mentioning about the stuff going down with redtea and cool at all.

Then he goes on to write this:

In post 811, GeorgeBailey wrote:

In post 809, Jacket wrote:

In post 805, GeorgeBailey wrote:

In post 801, fua wrote:What if it’s just 2 PRs and the traitor? No goons abound.

Very possible since there's multi tasking.

This is the thing you decide to jump in and comment on?

I was MIA during the weekend and I'm posting on break. Idk. Just trying to get a grip on the game right now. I'm gonna post more in depth stuff after work.

Where he promises to give more in depth stuff after work. Obviously he never did that so we still have zero clue on who George thinks is scum or his read on anyone really. Now, I can understand IRL stuff happening and getting in the way. But the thing with George is, even when he is here he gives us nothing at all about who he thinks is scum. Instead he gives us short comments or fluff stuffs that dosen't really take a stance on anything and basically seems to be comments for the sake of comments. All in all he seems very scummy to me.

In post 951, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 947, Three wrote:

In post 807, Dwlee99 wrote:Beginning of ISO: doesn't say much. Doesn't interact much. First time involved in actual conversation happens to be when the mech convo with the traitor stuff comes up. Since then, not much to impress me except maybe the truce thing from y'all but I feel like I shouldn't put a ton of stock into it. The townread on me kinda feels like he knows it's true which is why he believes it cause Occam's is just scummy -> scum and I don't think he has played with me to know my playstyle just kinda is this. I think people new to my playstyle tend to scumread me naturally so it's kind of weird for him to actually townread me for thinking I look scummy

Pretty sure this is Dwlee99 who posted this.

Read what I wrote and read what you wrote again?

What are the differences between what you two wrote, then?

In post 952, Three wrote:

In post 948, Three wrote:I'd prefer if you just admitted you're death tunneling me,

because despite every single one of your concerns being addressed

, you still scum read me.

See, Dwlee, I read what you wrote. Your other concerns already got talked about and dealt with, which I mention here. So what problem do you have exactly, that hasn't already been refuted?

How was my point about your entrance being empty until mech discussion "refuted?" You townreading me despite thinking I'm scummy has been given an explanation (but not really from you) but not debunked, and now you're angling to flip your read on me by framing me as unreasonable for scumreading you here. What should I be townreading from you?

@Fua

The townread on me kinda feels like he knows it's true which is why he believes it cause Occam's is just scummy -> scum and I don't think he has played with me to know my playstyle just kinda is this. I think people new to my playstyle tend to scumread me naturally so it's kind of weird for him to actually townread me for thinking I look scummy

In post 945, Three wrote:They think it's scummy that I town read them despite getting scum read by them

My argument: thinking that someone being scummy is town-indicative is weird unless you know someone's playstyle, he frames it as me scumreading him for him not OMGUSing me.

And then this:

In post 807, Dwlee99 wrote:Beginning of ISO: doesn't say much. Doesn't interact much. First time involved in actual conversation happens to be when the mech convo with the traitor stuff comes up. [...] Since then, not much to impress me except maybe the truce thing from y'all but I feel like I shouldn't put a ton of stock into it.

Is just ignored. Again, what should I be townreading other than the truce? Is that supposed to be clearing? Cause I know a lot of people would take the truce as scum there

In post 950, redtea wrote:

In post 773, Almost50 wrote:

In post 315, redtea wrote:also there's daytalk

What's that got to do with anything??

good question

Also this is tinfoil but I actually hate this post upon seeing it again cause I feel like it's parroting a post George made after seeing someone townread George for it.

In post 953, TheZenMan wrote:Dwele, feels like most of your argument of Three being scum is that he townread you? Assuming that new people scumread you naturally is a bad take and way to general to apply to everyone. Some people can think that playstyle is town indicative. Feels at this point you are just tunneling three because you are afraid to move off him or for the sake of having someone to push.

His entrance is terrible and I don't think anything has redeemed that

Hey.

Hi

Dearest felicitations!

In post 889, Almost50 wrote:

In post 795, Jacket wrote:Do you think I would deliberately antagonize the claimed vig as a scum PR?

I don't know you, so I can't predict your play style.

Nothing to do with anyone's playstyle. Think about what makes sense in this situation. If redtea's claim is true, I'd expect the mafia PR to be trying to get on their good side so as to not get shot by them.

House
Almost50


HawaiianPizza
TheZenMan
Dwlee99


redtea
cool cookie
fua


T3
Save The Dragons
GeorgeBailey
Three


Don't really want to vote anyone outside the bottom group, TBH. I mostly think the attention on cool cookie is people trying to find a super smart theory of who's scum rather than looking at the people who aren't being town.

T3 is almost certainly clear. Why do you group redtea with cookie?

If you think A50 is town then T3 should be town too.

Catching up

In post 862, fua wrote:

In post 860, T3 wrote:

In post 830, Almost50 wrote:

In post 529, T3 wrote:

STD IS TOWN

Ya think? Enlighten me

Meta

What parts of his meta explain his alignment here? Does scum StD not act this way?

Scum std doesn’t act this way.

aha it's something i do as scum eh?

or something i don't do.

hmm.

In post 891, fua wrote:

In post 890, Almost50 wrote:

In post 797, Dwlee99 wrote:Who are you neighbors with?

Why do you want to know?

I thought the answer was relatively obvious to begin with based on the context given.

Maybe

-

-