Mafiascum.net

Someone is violating the monopoly on unfathomable thoughts

@Vivax, since you’re around, what do you make of Klick again?

In post 951, Andresvmb wrote:@Vivax, since you’re around, what do you make of Klick again?

The ISO is balsamic and I find myself agreeing with a lot of reads to the point where I assume hardbussing. If Ircher is scum this game has all the stomp vibes and Klick would be the deepscum candidate in my books.

I don‘t really get the townread on you, which maybe is the point of your play. In which case congratz, you succeeded. Because Klick interjected when we were in a clinch, which is something to keep in mind imo.

Definitely not an early lim for me though.

What does balsamic mean? Google doesn't know.

In post 953, furtiveglance wrote:What does balsamic mean? Google doesn't know.

Soothing. We got the idiom 'balsam for the soul'. Balsamico being Italian vinegar, Balsam being something like a reinvigorating pomade. Klick posts like a pomade, others like a leaking bottle of very sour vinegar

In post 933, Uncrowned wrote:so i've "been fine"

but some stuff "feels off"

that you still haven't engaged on

ok imma leave this for now this is getting nowhere lmao

yes, i do not engage with everyone about every point that i think feels off

sometimes i think it would be useful to do so, like if i could try to better understand a thought process or clarify a point or if i think asking about it could help me sort them in some way or if i want to pressure or if i want other people to look at the things im pointing out

sometimes none of those really apply

i don't think that me telling you that my gut reaction to some of your posts is that you're forcing your points a little bit and everything feels kinda... appeal-y? is going to be useful

id rather just let you do your thing for now and watch and see if i still feel that way after more things have happened

Back to Vivax I go.
VOTE: Vivax

you should claim ircher

In post 941, Uncrowned wrote:i'd like to know where nero's heads at given the whole thing about ircher's wagon being too fast to hit L-1 on p14. has that changed now that things developed or is the sentiment still the same?

my head is ontop of my neck.

I feel like ppl aren't really reading my posts. I agree that his posting hasn't been very good, is he just an uncharismatic town getting ran up? 4 is NOT the norm for 21 players games so I'm kinda

Maybe it is a bit of FOMO on my part but I could see him being scum, I guess.

In post 957, Nero Cain wrote:you should claim ircher

I'm a social media influencer. I am able to post public messages through the moderator using 20% productivity points.

In post 959, Ircher wrote:

In post 957, Nero Cain wrote:you should claim ircher

I'm a social media influencer. I am able to post public messages through the moderator using 20% productivity points.

Do it now go

It's a night action.

In post 961, Ircher wrote:It's a night action.

pen
sieve

Seems like a lot of points for that ability tbh.

In post 959, Ircher wrote:

In post 957, Nero Cain wrote:you should claim ircher

I'm a social media influencer. I am able to post public messages through the moderator using 20% productivity points.

In post 961, Ircher wrote:It's a night action.

Lmfao I claimed exactly the same role during warhammer mash.

Newsflash: I was scum

Sounds like a possible scum role to me. Might be town but not much utility.

In post 959, Ircher wrote:

In post 957, Nero Cain wrote:you should claim ircher

I'm a social media influencer. I am able to post public messages through the moderator using 20% productivity points.

It sounds like a crier. I mean it's only useful if Datisi confirms that the message comes from a town, otherwise it sucks.

In post 965, Titus wrote:Sounds like a possible scum role to me. Might be town but not much utility.

I mean, there is a role that allows one to pm the mod to publicly post a message. So FMPOV its a plausible claim b/c I don't think its impossible that datsi ci-opts that role and just renames it. I feel your post was kinda manipulative.

The message is anonymous and confirmed not to have come from the moderator. Of course, it's not really anonymous anymore now that I've claimed.

In post 968, Ircher wrote:The message is anonymous and confirmed not to have come from the moderator. Of course, it's not really anonymous anymore now that I've claimed.

It doesn't reveal your alignment then. I feel like if that's the case, it has literally zero value. On mafia.gg there's a Crier which is confirmed to be town.

petapan - Town
Ausuka - Town
Malakittens - Town
Nero Cain - Town
PenguinPower - Town
Lukewarm - Town
furtiveglance - Town
Roden - Town
Titus - Scum
Uncrowned - Town
Vivax - Scum
Andresvmb - Town
mastina - Town
jjh927 - Town
Ircher - Town
RCEnigma - Scum
BlueBloodedToffee - Scum
Klick - Town
Something_Smart - Town
Ydrasse - Town
fireisredsir - Town

In post 969, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 968, Ircher wrote:The message is anonymous and confirmed not to have come from the moderator. Of course, it's not really anonymous anymore now that I've claimed.

It doesn't reveal your alignment then. I feel like if that's the case, it has literally zero value. On mafia.gg there's a Crier which is confirmed to be town.

I wasn't planning on using it, but it has situational value depending on the setup.

In post 971, Ircher wrote:

In post 969, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 968, Ircher wrote:The message is anonymous and confirmed not to have come from the moderator. Of course, it's not really anonymous anymore now that I've claimed.

It doesn't reveal your alignment then. I feel like if that's the case, it has literally zero value. On mafia.gg there's a Crier which is confirmed to be town.

I wasn't planning on using it, but it has situational value depending on the setup.

You think it has no value in this setup, and hadn't planned to use it. Did you not think about using it as a basis for a claim?

It's cost benefit analysis. We need to average 75-80% productivity. If I spend 20% just to prove a claim, that's rather a waste.

In post 973, Ircher wrote:It's cost benefit analysis. We need to average 75-80% productivity. If I spend 20% just to prove a claim, that's rather a waste.

Yeah, it also doesn't prove a claim.