Page 386 of 765
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 5:38 am
by Nero Cain
In post 9619, Alisae wrote:Nah I don't want to vote LUV.
Yes he's being LUV.
But I think he's just being stubborn more then anything.
I think he's coasting scum. We
SHOULD
be listening to his reads though b/c there be buddies in there.
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 5:42 am
by Nero Cain
In post 9624, Alisae wrote:Like Nero, I don't really know what you're expecting from LUV tbh
I would expect him to be using his voice and vote. I know he can be p bad but he's intentionally impeding game progress. I mean he can be kinda weird. In Smackdown he didn't really have any solid scum reads but here he actually has reads so I'm not sure sure why he's not voting.
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 5:44 am
by Creature
Wagons should happen.
We should prioritize who's not trying to push any wagon, just lowhanging...
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 5:46 am
by Alisae
In post 9627, Creature wrote:We should prioritize who's not trying to push any wagon, just lowhanging...
First people I think that when you say this: Maxous, Vecna, Yuri, Cloudie, Gin, Dave.
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 5:47 am
by Creature
Is Sondam pushing any wagon?
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 5:47 am
by Creature
I cloud do Cloudie, Gin or Dave.
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 5:47 am
by Nero Cain
like even on RAW he was using his vote so I'm not really getting why he isn't here. And I'm not a huge fan of the "a wagon might not happen" excuse.
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 5:48 am
by Alisae
Actually strike Vecna from that, I think he was trying to push dave or something but memory fails me.
Sondam was pushing these "Scumclaims!" the last few pages so yes.
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 5:48 am
by Nero Cain
In post 9627, Creature wrote:We should prioritize who's not trying to push any wagon, just lowhanging..
LUV isn't pushing anything...he's doing nothing but active lurking.
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 5:51 am
by Nero Cain
Like LUV, Dave and Nancy are all great wagons but everyone is being a kid and won't compromise.
"I want my wagon-my wagon-my wagon!"
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 5:54 am
by Nero Cain
I guess I'd need to do the same, I mean I don't think Sondam is as scummy as those 3 but they are somewhat lurky so I guess I'd be ok there.
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 5:56 am
by Nero Cain
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 5:57 am
by Creature
My vote's already on davesaz.
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 5:58 am
by Creature
Please, we need a lynch and preferably on someone who's just making us wait.
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 5:59 am
by Leonshade
A non-TR lynch would be a victory at this point.
LUV's play isn't great but he just looks apathetic more than scummy. I remember wanting to push LUV from Smackdown Mafia if I wouldn't have gotten drafted.
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 5:59 am
by Creature
Fuck, this is why the solution for large games is plurality lynch, otherwise town will never achieve a lynch.
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 6:00 am
by Caesar Wills It
Please present you case against Senator davesaz, or direct Us to where you have concisely presented it already.
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 6:01 am
by Leonshade
VOTE: CloudKicker
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 6:01 am
by Creature
In post 9641, Caesar Wills It wrote:Please present you case against Senator davesaz, or direct Us to where you have concisely presented it already.
Present your case to townread davesaz.
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 6:02 am
by Creature
The only lynches you should oppose at this point are your townreads.
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 6:02 am
by Creature
We have 3 days left of deadline and I'm going to behave like we have 10 hours left of deadline.
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 6:03 am
by Creature
Who's voting davesaz so far?
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 6:05 am
by Nero Cain
In post 9641, Caesar Wills It wrote:Please present you case against Senator davesaz, or direct Us to where you have concisely presented it already.
His ISO is promises of future content and I'm not a fan of his reaction to getting wagoned.
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 6:05 am
by Caesar Wills It
Also, Senator Creature, We concur with your position regarding parliamentary rules of protocol in large quora of the Senate.
We have no case for the loyalty of Senator davesaz, and are in fact not maintaining that particular position. However, We are entirely mystified as to what the actual allegations against him are, or why they are better than those presented against other candidates more worthy of conviction in Our eyes. The burden of proof is generally upon the accuser, not upon the bystander.
Why is Senator davesaz a better candidate than, say, Sondam? Or Maxous? Some support has been given for each of these, and We see more merit to those cases. We are concerned that you are pushing for a decision to appease consensus rather than Justice.
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 6:05 am
by Lil Uzi Vert
In Smackdown I had the manager as scum lol