Are you being replaced in other games? This seems very out of place considering the case just presented against you.Korts wrote:I know if any, this is the game that I should keep going in, but I have no time for mafia whatsoever at this point. I apologize deeply for any trouble I may be causing.
mod: replace me please.
You have the post number for that disclosure? Eitehr in the game as a whole or in the isolation. I simply must have missed it. Or was it a N2 disclosure?Oddly, reading raider's N1 disclosure the claimed informatia raider and Korts got seem like they could fit together. But if that's the case, why am I only the first person making this connection?
Yet more good pointsVi wrote:I can vouch that Korts has been getting replaced all around. Good luck with what's going on IRL, Korts. Hungarian Power, etc.
I side with Korts that pushing accusations based on the term "bulletproof" is retarded. It's the standard name for the role, and inevery other gameMafiosi use these modern inventions called "bullets". And after reading... Korts' claim isn't necessarily terrible, except for the part where he claimed Rhinox killed Occam. What bothers me is how he made a show of saying he can't divulge that his information came from Candle Ja--er, the m*d, when the only regulation I see on the matter in the rules is againstquotingstuff from the mod. In addition, he says that he got this information in a manner "similar to how raider got his about the sheep", yet raider's information came from a role-related ability and Korts has made no mention of such a thing. Oddly, reading raider's N1 disclosure the claimed informatia raider and Korts got seem like they could fit together. But if that's the case, why am I only the first person making this connection?
I sense that somewhere, some key information is being missed. Which would suggest that that information wasn't there in the first place? Intuition strongly suggests against this, but--
Vote: Korts(L-2)
No objections here. The case on korts is strong, I know he's lying, and I think I have all the information I need to make an informed decision tonight. Unfortunately for whoever replaces in, nothing they could say would reverse my vote at this point.TonyMontana wrote:The claim as sheep is allright, but I agree with Vi that the ambigious claims of knowledge are bad.
All in all, the attack on rhinox has been ridiculously horrible. I'm not saying RX is def town, but he's def not mafia.
unvote
Any objections to a hammer at this point?
A ram is the proper term for a male sheep. An ewe is the female term for a sheep.raider wrote: On thing I do find odd and have sense the claim is that he claimed sheep a long time ago but claiming sheep is not the same as claiming ram.
You said you overheard a shepherd talking to his sheep.raider8169 982 wrote:What information could fit together? I dont know what you are referring too.
Ewe? I dont recall ever hearing that before now.freeko wrote:A ram is the proper term for a male sheep. An ewe is the female term for a sheep.raider wrote: On thing I do find odd and have sense the claim is that he claimed sheep a long time ago but claiming sheep is not the same as claiming ram.
This is just so you know. Wikipedia and freshman biology (15 years ago, which is why I had to check wiki and make sure) told me so.
I never caught that before. All these do add up in favor of korts but nothing is going to help getting him replaced. I hope to be able to review Korts better tonight.Vi wrote:You said you overheard a shepherd talking to his sheep.raider8169 982 wrote:What information could fit together? I dont know what you are referring too.
Korts claimed (among other things) Favorite Sheep, so the shepherd (Occam) would have been talking tohim.
Just thought I would point this out.Korts post 68 in isolation wrote: well I don't have a conventional rolename. Instead of the standard "you are a <rolename>" I got "you are a sheep."
I dont recall any action other then this post. I dont think it means anything by itself but it might if there is more of where that came from.Korts post 76 in isolation wrote: At this point I'm starting to grow more fond of a Juls wagon
Not much interaction against Juls is noted. Not sure it means anything though.Korts post 93 in isolation wrote: Nevertheless the play today is either Rhinox or Juls
This one is a biggie to me. If the information was similar to mine he would have been able to post it. I said how I got my inside information so it does seem like something that scum would have the knowledge of.Korts post 117 in isolation wrote: In, I think, a similar way to how raider gained knowledge of the sheep, I got the information that Rhinox is responsible for the Occam shepherd's death. It is from a reliable source.
These are just some posts I wanted everyone else to see again. I can not say I have anything to go against the wagon as I do not know who the information I have is pointing to however I can still see it as being Korts.Korts post 119 in isolation wrote: The information that Rhinox is scum was not role-based.
