Posted: Wed May 22, 2013 8:50 am
Pretty sure I already answered this. Yes.In post 969, Nachomamma8 wrote:F, same question to you as I asked buldey. Are you reading the mollie head as town?
Pretty sure I already answered this. Yes.In post 969, Nachomamma8 wrote:F, same question to you as I asked buldey. Are you reading the mollie head as town?
In post 973, TiphaineDeath wrote:Your vote should always be founded on your own logic, if your own logic agrees with someone elses, is their logic makes you change yours, fine. But sheeping as pure sheeping IMO has always been and will always be wrong.
With the exception of BRO, I have a lot of experiential meta to go on. With BRO, we just finished playing a newbie game together so his town game is quite fresh in my mind. I also have a lot of experiential meta with Svenskt, but I've tended to null/slightly town read him early on. This game's not really different in that respect. The first game I played with him, he was scum, so I think I have a scum baseline to work from.In post 968, Varsoon wrote:@2: Thanks for the list. Could you articulate why you think these more active players are town and these less active ones are scum?
Why did you ask this question to sven? It's a good discussion starter, but you never followed up on this.
ok.In post 261, Varsoon wrote:@Sven:
Ah, who do you think is town, so far?
@GIF:
I could see where he would understand miller-tracker as two roles.
253 is too compelling, though.
Elaborate on this.In post 261, Varsoon wrote: I really like Sven's claim more and more now. It feels like a litmus test for town/scum.
You didn't read my last post, did you. I've already placed a vote. So this entire post is not paying attention and completely fake.In post 978, Varsoon wrote:Ghostlin, it's interesting that you include me in your scum-list based off of things 500 posts ago, rather than what is currently happening.
Regardless, I find it doubly neat that you're supporting the TD wagon and my own.
Put a vote somewhere.
You should probably articulate -why-.
Also, could you explain why you're supporting some of the easiest wagons at this point? Seems like you're scum trying to push them through, rather than town that's actually convinced of scum being there.
Tl;dr- I'm not convinced. Slam a vote and make an argument.
1) I read it rather selectively. I don't have much time due to an exam so I skipped a lot of the longer posts. For instance, I didn't read the content of the long posts Varsoon and Majiffy made. I just noticed what kind of reads they had and made my read based on that. Varsoon voted someone who was unlikely to get lynched (I don't even remember who) after an asburdly long entrance post, so I asserted that he is probably town based on that. Majiffy is active and seems to care, so he's town. I still think TD is scum. I also don't like Cabd. I havn't found a reason to think orc or you are scum, so I'm just going to trust f's town read on the two of you. I'm not certain that Sven is town, but lynching him today is dumb. I have no idea how to read Rach - I've reached the conclusion that her posts just always seem anti-town to me regardless of her alignment. I want to have a look at the Sven wagon as I've already mentioned, but havn't had time yet. I havn't really read the rest of the players posts careful enough to make any read.In post 921, Nachomamma8 wrote:First of all, your read was oriented completely around TD-me-mollie-orc, things like that. You ignored the Varsoon situation completely, and you found nothing to comment on from anyone else. What do you think of everyone else?
Why did this concern you? Was there a game you played with mollie-scum where she didn't have a clear read on you?In post 844, ² wrote:I was mostly concerned with how mollie didn't have any clear read on our slot. First she simultanously read me as town and f as scum. Then she simultanously read me as town and scum. Usually she has a clear read, even when she's wrong.
I asked you what you thought of her, saw nothing. What do you think of her and her specifically?
And you not commenting on Varsoon at all but commenting on us, commenting on me. That was suspicious. It shows you're more concerned about fixing your rep than looking for the scum you're supposed to be finding.In post 850, ² wrote:Which I did. She told me that the two of you had a run in, that Nacho decided we're scum and that orc wants us to vote varsoom, who went on a wall-posting spree overnight with utterly bizarre stuff. I then told her I'd be reading and she told me she'd not be posting for a while.
This seemed strange, considering your immediate townread on Majiffy after. I felt like you were preemptively defending against the Majiffy scumread, especially since I don't remember him ever calling you scum except when he was scum and being an idiot.In post 859, ² wrote:I'll almost guarantee that he will scum read me even if the two of you are town - that's sort of what he does.
You usually know when I'm empty shit-talking.In post 880, ² wrote:What can I do to help you stop being an idiot?
You know that I'm not sure of a scumread on you two or I wouldn't be afraid to tunnel the shit out of you.
This question is very, very late. You never followed up when you mixed him and Cabd up before.In post 899, ² wrote:Nacho, how the fuck can you be town reading this?
Read his most recent post that's not "town rage".In post 902, ² wrote:What independent thought?
My townread on him until recently had to make a lot of inferences. Since he's not as bleedingly town as others, I would rather people like orc put on TD votes instead of Varsoon votes, for example.In post 903, ² wrote:You don't really mind votes on him? How is that compatible with town reading him? Why don't you just explicitly admit that you're wrong with your read on him?
Lack of followup. You were like "whoops, wrong one". And the fact that you didn't notice you mixed them up until I pointed out you did showed me that you sure as hell didn't read my reasoning for him being town. But mostly, it was the lack of followup.In post 907, ² wrote:I thought I already explained why I mixed up the two at the time. What is it that you think the problem is exactly?
Sorry, I fucked up. But did you really think that I was trying to discredit your town game?In post 911, ² wrote:What the fuck? No I fucking wasn't. I identified you on my own, which I'm positive she can confirm.
Also fuck you for trying to discredit me in this manner.
I'm pretty sure she wanted to talk to me on gchat after I had read the thread prior to posting reads.In post 923, Nachomamma8 wrote:I also don't understand why ffery stopped posting. Taking a step back? Cool. Completely vanishing before she gives out her complete read set? Bad.
This does look like a town response to that question, given the situation.In post 938, Cabd wrote:Last one, slight scum-lean.
Top three, that was because you guys brought up an outside game and talked shit about it, i'd be pissed too.
why is TMT down as scum for you here? he only has 2 posts, surely this is not enough to go on. looks like a couple of pretty average posts to me.In post 966, ² wrote:Town: orcinus, nacho, B&B, BRO
Leaning town:
svenskt (for today - pretty sure this is my view only , not buldermar's)
Andreius
GiF (that was a weird thing about the chat game, though)
Cabd (in part based on nacho and to a lesser extent Rach)
Null/Town:
Rach (always and forever I swear)
Varsoon
Ghostlin (this read could slide)
Mac
Leaning Scum:
TD (buldermar's read mostly)
TMTwhatev
Maybe AJ
Not enough info to go on: Sajin, dntfkingcare, Metal Sonic, jon_h61
This is not a consensus list (yet anyway), but some of my views are influenced by buldermar's opinions.
There's a past game where he did something similar? I just thought he was scum because his second post sucked big time, but meta is bonus.In post 988, Cabd wrote:I think everyone reading TMTOF ETCWTF as scum are basing it upon his past game where he did a similar kind of early posting, but eh.
Yeah, I'm gonna ignore this game for a while.In post 992, Sajin wrote:I wish you guys would cool it a little bit. 40 pages already is a little much and I need a while to sift through it all. Give me a bit.
just because nacho voted before me, doesn't mean I was waiting for him. regardless, nacho's a strong town read of mine so I'd feel pretty comfortable with him anyway.In post 945, Aj The Epic wrote: Mac's vote looks bad. He presents a well thought-out case on me, then waits for Nacho to vote. I've got to run to work (I just needed to catch up before you guys let loose the flood gates) so I'll respond more to his post later.
If I replace into a game in which the best player I know participates and that player is an innocent child (confirmed town by mod) and there is an hour left and my vote is the deciding vote between two players, should I listen to that player and follow his logic or should I arbitrarily place my vote based on my own logic from reading the 1/100th part of the game that I have time to read prior to deadline?In post 973, TiphaineDeath wrote:Your vote should always be founded on your own logic, if your own logic agrees with someone elses, is their logic makes you change yours, fine. But sheeping as pure sheeping IMO has always been and will always be wrong.
hmmm I can see where you are coming from. I still think it's a bit weak, we really need to here more from him.In post 994, ² wrote:@Mac it was his second post. Of all the posts related to svenskt's role claims he picked one where svenskt said Cabd sounded awkward, and pushed it further - to the effect that Cabd was trying to say "I'm town" without actually saying it. Out of everything in the thread to that point, he picked a way to subtly support the claimed miller and undermine a player talking about how scum might react to the claimed miller.