Mafiascum.net

On the basis of claiming survivor the way Triforce did (prematurely) and the basis of their claim I think at this juncture it doesn't make much sense to lynch them now when there are other scummier candidates available. I am pretty happy with Axxle scum but the fact that ActionDan hasn't done anything since the initial suspicion of him died away means I would rather see him lynched today.



PEdit: There he is. Hi Dan, save your skin time, do you want to you know, make some thoughts before taking the easy way out? (voting the counter wagon without adding anything useful)

I mean granted be butthurt with cdb all you want, but the fact is, he and others have points against you that are valid and until you give us something to go on, I don't see any reason to think you are town.

and also I believe cdb mentioned that I should know his meta from the meet or some nonsense but if he wants to use an argument like that (and for the record I have always had trouble with reading cdb in f2f) then he should be able to figure out that I lurk in all my games. especially when I'm playing 6-7 at once

poro the points against me are that I lurk.

You do not lurk in all your games.

YOU LIE.

The prosecution rests.

Srsly AD I think it's pretty likely that you lurked in this game hoping that it would make your wagon go away. Like, on purpose rather than omg guys i am so busy with my games i have a life aka other mafia games and cannot post all the time!

The only real question I have about it is whether you did that as town.

And I mean sorry bud but I think you kind of deserve it if you did that as town cuz I mean WHO CAN BLAME ANYONE FOR FINDING THAT SCUMMY you are just setting yourself up for misropes if you behave in that fashion.

So I think that like the wcs is a mislynch that teaches everyone a valuable lesson about active lurking.

In post 977, ActionDan wrote:poro the points against me are that I lurk.

In your few posts you focused solely on CDB, and latterly the survivor claim. You have made no indication any reads or had any real interaction with any other player. Nor have you really made any effort to do so. You disappeared when the initial suspicion against you died down, and you have only come back now that you are in danger of being lynched.

Now, I may have touched on it as a side thing there, but lurking only comes into minorly...

I really wanted a punchier last line there. Sad times.

In post 982, Porochaz wrote:In your few posts you focused solely on CDB

...badly. We shouldn't forget that part. Lots of people have spent time focusing on me. Dan did it .

In post 963, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:^@Nuwen, obviously.

Fate, why is she town?

shes easy to read...

you can try to crosskill her if you want

my wagon is made up of die hard actiondan must die people.

hope for what by lurking exactly?

Poro is town Im not gonna 2nd guess myself

In post 986, ActionDan wrote:my wagon is made up of die hard actiondan must die people.

hope for what by lurking exactly?

my god at least I can rest easy knowing scum will die today

In post 969, Iecerint wrote:

In post 961, Fate wrote:

Unvote
Vote: ActionDan

Goddamn cowards

Lynching the survivor is...brave?

LYNCHING THE CLAIMED

CLAUMRD
CLAIMES


CLAIMS TO BE


NOT FUCKING IS

JUST LIKE RECK CLAIMS TO BE A FUCKIN PRINCRSS

In post 973, Iecerint wrote:Let's lynch ActionDan today and UT tomorrow please. Nuwen D3.

LINE EM UP.

so this is a really weird list

okay cool so Dan is scum

I think Waffles is more likely to be scum than triforce, triforce is likely to be a third party (but any other part of their claim might be horseshit, like the protection), and that UT's erraticism is genuine but not pro-town in the case I pointed out.

I haven't heard anyone speak the same words, Icerint. I definitely haven't read a case f Waffles, except for Faraday's winks and jovial hints. If I missed it, link me because I'm at the skim + narrow focus reading stage.

Guys let's just lynch one and today and then nudge nudge wink wink tomorrow.

I think I'd read the same logic like 3-4 times (Waffles IIRC, and I said something similar, others too I think).

Skim+Narrow does explain it away, but leans scummy. Doesn't lean as scummy as Dan active-lurking, though.

I'm going to unvote so that I can demonstrate my claimed ability.



I will revote ActionDan if it becomes clear that he has a viable alternawagon (not that it'll matter numerically -- I just don't want people to forget about me due to the wagon being smaller by 1). I am voting Dan with all my heart on the inside.

If this leads to a Triforce accidental hammer I will be very annoyed.

I'm kind of thinking that your ability might be a scum ability so...

you go ahead and prove it bud

In post 984, ChannelDelibird wrote:

In post 982, Porochaz wrote:In your few posts you focused solely on CDB

...badly. We shouldn't forget that part. Lots of people have spent time focusing on me. Dan did it

really badly

.

We also have eaglekit only focusing on mollie and I think possibly some others also single-focused.

I don't think that means much though.

In post 993, Nuwen wrote:I think Waffles is more likely to be scum than triforce, triforce is likely to be a third party (but any other part of their claim might be horseshit, like the protection), and that UT's erraticism is genuine but not pro-town in the case I pointed out.

I haven't heard anyone speak the same words, Icerint. I definitely haven't read a case f Waffles, except for Faraday's winks and jovial hints. If I missed it, link me because I'm at the skim + narrow focus reading stage.

Just vote them anyway, who needs cases?