↑ Catastrophe wrote:You're running around in a circle, copper.
The role does one thing when he's alive and another when he's dead. You can look at it from any angle and that fact will be, and always has been, true. What you're saying right now is basically "If it's something he has when he's alive, it's pro-town. If it's something he has when he's dead, it's pro-scum."
It's a role that functions regardless of his actions whether he's alive or dead, so what you're saying makes no sense. It's like saying A=B, B=C and A=C, but when you look at A it looks pro-town and when you look at C it looks pro-scum.
Also, this is not correct.
If I say, "Copper, if you let me play on your PS4, I'll give you a cupcake every day," that's a positive interaction. Pro-copper, pro-me. Even pro-cupcake!
If I say, "Copper, if you don't let me play on your PS4, I'll take away your cupcakes," that's me being a total jerk. Negative interaction. Only pro-me. Scummy.
If Kthxbye was giving us this ability while he was alive, that's pro-town. If he was taking an ability we already had away from us if he died, that's pro-scum. You were arguing it was the second scenario, something no one else had argued or even mentioned.
The second scenario turns out to be the case. Only you knew that. Kthxbye didn't say it. So why did you think about it like that, especially if you were so terribly confused?
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here."
