Well, Nacho is a slot I'm suspicious about right now but I'd like Empire to weigh in because he was townreading him last time we discussed the game.
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 6:25 pm
by Zar
↑Nachomamma8 wrote:Why not Zar? Zar hasn't done anything vaguely townish. He's made a weak push on me, then disappeared.
I should be able to post more regularly now, if that makes you feel better? You also have seen me play before and are probably the only player here that could have been a member of the Circlejerk if you wanted to! Curious why you haven't brought up my usual play, since you have access to Westeros and that micro we played in where I was the "megatron hydra".
Green = prob town
Blue = town bloc
Red = people i dont mind seeing fried
i dont like how half of hoopla is people i like seeing fried.
Metal join the kagami wagon. I am liking it more atm
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 2:23 am
by Metal Sonic
Try counting the votes when hoopla was at l-1
There was abr, GreyICE and wgeurts. That was more legit. Now there is GreyICE yelling again and everyone ran away
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 2:33 am
by Metal Sonic
Was Kagami in organic chemistry? I don't remember her. Vezokpiraka would like to say that he has Kagami as town because of orgo chem
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 2:35 am
by Metal Sonic
Kagami wasn't in organic chemistry, I'm not sure what he's talking about.
I think still think that we should lynch hoopla
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 3:46 am
by Zar
Nacho
: when you're back, I really would like if you could go on and explain more your Seraphim read from 648.
Seraphim
:
↑Zar wrote:Speaking of Serpahim, there's one thing I want to ask him: Why's your team's opinion so adamant to talk about declaring token use?
The reason I asked you this is basically because Seraphim I'd like you to tell me if there's any reason why I shouldn't think you would have bid scum tokens for this setup, given that your team seemed reluctant to have it discussed.
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:11 am
by Metal Sonic
↑Metal Sonic wrote:Kagami wasn't in organic chemistry, I'm not sure what he's talking about.
vezok has made a mistake, he remembered the wrong player
carry on.
@ABR lol we couldnt even get a Hoopla lynch, it's not possible to lynch nacho today regardless
↑Metal Sonic wrote:Kagami wasn't in organic chemistry, I'm not sure what he's talking about.
vezok has made a mistake, he remembered the wrong player
carry on.
@ABR lol we couldnt even get a Hoopla lynch, it's not possible to lynch nacho today regardless
Metal if I sheep you on hoopla will you sheep me on kagami 2moro?
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:40 am
by Metal Sonic
↑GreyICE wrote:If Sotty returned for a last hurrah, it's very easy to think that she would select scum for it. Mith did it in the first team mafia, and he's the site's founder! That gives me a very good reason to believe that she would token scum, and LLD's game (pre-remake) gives me a very good reason to believe those who token scum would get it.
Whoa whoa whoa stop here son. Just because somebody did something doesn't mean that another specific person would do the same thing. Slippery slope argument. Logic gap. Nonsense. Bad argument.
And even if you "think" that she would token scum (P.S: nobody in their right mind tokens scum in this setup),
"LLD's game (pre-remake) gives me a very good reason to believe those who token scum would get it."
is a terrible fallacy. This shit won't hold up in a debate argument. Even if the conclusion is true (I do not know), it is an objectively terrible argument. Objectively.
↑GreyICE wrote:If Sotty returned for a last hurrah, it's very easy to think that she would select scum for it. Mith did it in the first team mafia, and he's the site's founder! That gives me a very good reason to believe that she would token scum, and LLD's game (pre-remake) gives me a very good reason to believe those who token scum would get it.
Whoa whoa whoa stop here son. Just because somebody did something doesn't mean that another specific person would do the same thing. Slippery slope argument. Logic gap. Nonsense. Bad argument.
And even if you "think" that she would token scum (P.S: nobody in their right mind tokens scum in this setup),
"LLD's game (pre-remake) gives me a very good reason to believe those who token scum would get it."
is a terrible fallacy. This shit won't hold up in a debate argument. Even if the conclusion is true (I do not know), it is an objectively terrible argument. Objectively.
Mafia ain't a debate, son. If it's a debate, then the same players will always be lynched, because debating ability is utterly independent of any sort of objective truth. I've watched a creationist demolish a guy with a PhD in biology in a stand-up, on-camera, lots of prep time debate, trust me, debating is good only for the entertainment of people who enjoy watching debates.
Fact is, tokens are a damn good reason to look at someone hard. Replacing out from one specific game is a damn good reason to look at a slot hard.
Oh and debates? Debates are useless here. You should know that if you know anything about debates - you debate philosophy, not facts. You debate "what should abortion policy be" or "what's a good tax rate" not "Is water in fact wet" or "Can you burn a piece of wood in a normal atmosphere". Role PMs are facts. You get them at the start of the game. You'll never win over scum to the idea that their role PM is red, they know for a fact it is long before you start "debating" them. Wagons good, debates bad.
Speaking of wagons, Nacho. It's a scooter. One of those put put electric scooters. I feel like I'd need a mall cop uniform to get on it.
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 5:07 am
by Metal Sonic
↑GreyICE wrote:Mafia ain't a debate, son. If it's a debate, then the same players will always be lynched, because debating ability is utterly independent of any sort of objective truth. I've watched a creationist demolish a guy with a PhD in biology in a stand-up, on-camera, lots of prep time debate, trust me, debating is good only for the entertainment of people who enjoy watching debates.
Fact is, tokens are a damn good reason to look at someone hard. Replacing out from one specific game is a damn good reason to look at a slot hard.
Oh and debates? Debates are useless here. You should know that if you know anything about debates - you debate philosophy, not facts. You debate "what should abortion policy be" or "what's a good tax rate" not "Is water in fact wet" or "Can you burn a piece of wood in a normal atmosphere". Role PMs are facts. You get them at the start of the game. You'll never win over scum to the idea that their role PM is red, they know for a fact it is long before you start "debating" them. Wagons good, debates bad.
You aren't debating with the lynchee, we aren't debating "are you scum". We're debating "Should x be lynched" or "Is zoraster in fact scum".
So yes, debates. I mean, what do you call a judicial process? Is the man guilty or not guilty? Usually the answer is a fact, set in stone, but they argue anyway. If you don't consider that a debate then fine, you win.
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 5:08 am
by Metal Sonic
In fact, we can get some expertise here in the form of Titus.
