Page 40 of 177

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:04 am
by Toranaga
In post 972, Quick wrote:
In post 968, Hopkirk wrote:
In post 967, Quick wrote:
In post 964, Hopkirk wrote:
In post 955, Quick wrote:Nero is clear and so is hopkirk.
What about Beeboy?

VOTE: Pan
Not sure but we can throw in cheeky for sure.
As town?
yeah. Your all clear.
how are all these people clear?

I mean I'm townreading all of them but why are you clearing them?

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:04 am
by Centipede Syndrome
ftr I don't plan to do anything but shitpost until I break the game.
Which will be variable but reasonable time as always.

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:05 am
by Hopkirk
Ausuka HI. Why am I town.

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:05 am
by Quick
In post 975, Toranaga wrote:
In post 972, Quick wrote:
In post 968, Hopkirk wrote:
In post 967, Quick wrote:
In post 964, Hopkirk wrote:
In post 955, Quick wrote:Nero is clear and so is hopkirk.
What about Beeboy?

VOTE: Pan
Not sure but we can throw in cheeky for sure.
As town?
yeah. Your all clear.
how are all these people clear?

I mean I'm townreading all of them but why are you clearing them?
I don't want to say because Scum could take advantage of that. Just trust me on that.

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:05 am
by Panopticon
In post 975, Toranaga wrote:
In post 972, Quick wrote:
In post 968, Hopkirk wrote:
In post 967, Quick wrote:
In post 964, Hopkirk wrote:
In post 955, Quick wrote:Nero is clear and so is hopkirk.
What about Beeboy?

VOTE: Pan
Not sure but we can throw in cheeky for sure.
As town?
yeah. Your all clear.
how are all these people clear?

I mean I'm townreading all of them but why are you clearing them?
Could be a busted role but I'm more inclined to disbelieve this claim.

WELL THEN

VOTE: CENTIPEDE SYNDROME

~The Observer

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:06 am
by Panopticon
In post 978, Quick wrote:
In post 975, Toranaga wrote:
In post 972, Quick wrote:
In post 968, Hopkirk wrote:
In post 967, Quick wrote:
In post 964, Hopkirk wrote:
In post 955, Quick wrote:Nero is clear and so is hopkirk.
What about Beeboy?

VOTE: Pan
Not sure but we can throw in cheeky for sure.
As town?
yeah. Your all clear.
how are all these people clear?

I mean I'm townreading all of them but why are you clearing them?
I don't want to say because Scum could take advantage of that. Just trust me on that.
Bullshit.

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:06 am
by Toranaga
VOTE: tchill

god bless that ISO. the first post was scummy, the centi vote was out of this world scummy, and this last post is incredibly awkward and unbelievable to be thinking of/saying. let's kill tchill.

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:06 am
by Ausuka
In post 977, Hopkirk wrote:Ausuka HI. Why am I town.
your tone is very towny, and you're playing like you did in floral.

pedit: ok I like that!
VOTE: tchill13

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:06 am
by Panopticon
"lol they're clear"
"lol don't question it"

Coming from the most incompetent player in this game, you can actually shove this right back up your ass.

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:07 am
by Ausuka
In post 980, Panopticon wrote:
In post 978, Quick wrote:
In post 975, Toranaga wrote:
In post 972, Quick wrote:
In post 968, Hopkirk wrote:
In post 967, Quick wrote:
In post 964, Hopkirk wrote:
In post 955, Quick wrote:Nero is clear and so is hopkirk.
What about Beeboy?

VOTE: Pan
Not sure but we can throw in cheeky for sure.
As town?
yeah. Your all clear.
how are all these people clear?

I mean I'm townreading all of them but why are you clearing them?
I don't want to say because Scum could take advantage of that. Just trust me on that.
Bullshit.
I don't think we should push him on this. there is an anti-claim mechanic.

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:07 am
by Hopkirk
In post 982, Ausuka wrote:
In post 977, Hopkirk wrote:Ausuka HI. Why am I town.
your tone is very towny, and you're playing like you did in floral.

pedit: ok I like that!
VOTE: tchill13
Tchill, HI. As another player in Floral, do you think Ausuka sounds legit here?

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:07 am
by Panopticon
In post 984, Ausuka wrote:
In post 980, Panopticon wrote:
In post 978, Quick wrote:
In post 975, Toranaga wrote:
In post 972, Quick wrote:
In post 968, Hopkirk wrote:
In post 967, Quick wrote:
In post 964, Hopkirk wrote:
In post 955, Quick wrote:Nero is clear and so is hopkirk.
What about Beeboy?

VOTE: Pan
Not sure but we can throw in cheeky for sure.
As town?
yeah. Your all clear.
how are all these people clear?

I mean I'm townreading all of them but why are you clearing them?
I don't want to say because Scum could take advantage of that. Just trust me on that.
Bullshit.
I don't think we should push him on this. there is an anti-claim mechanic.
I didn't say we should, I'm stating my disbelief that his role can clear 5 people in one shot.

~The Observer

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:09 am
by Quick
In post 986, Panopticon wrote:
In post 984, Ausuka wrote:
In post 980, Panopticon wrote:
In post 978, Quick wrote:
In post 975, Toranaga wrote:
In post 972, Quick wrote:
In post 968, Hopkirk wrote:
In post 967, Quick wrote:
In post 964, Hopkirk wrote:
In post 955, Quick wrote:Nero is clear and so is hopkirk.
What about Beeboy?

VOTE: Pan
Not sure but we can throw in cheeky for sure.
As town?
yeah. Your all clear.
how are all these people clear?

I mean I'm townreading all of them but why are you clearing them?
I don't want to say because Scum could take advantage of that. Just trust me on that.
Bullshit.
I don't think we should push him on this. there is an anti-claim mechanic.
I didn't say we should, I'm stating my disbelief that his role can clear 5 people in one shot.

~The Observer
I am not known for my SRs being good but my TRs are dec.

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:09 am
by Brian Skies
In post 952, Hopkirk wrote:1.) Why does scum me push people then 'back off'? What do I gain there? Think about actual scum motivation before saying it's scummy since scum have no incentive to do that. You're scumreading style rather than motive.
Why can't town me like responses? Why do I not move on to other people when I'm happy with what I have?

2.) The initial engagement wasn't leading anywhere. Not sure why you think it's scummy to try and make it something meaningful.
1) Because it makes it seem look like you're engaging and trying to sort people. Or that maybe they should townread you or ignore you when you back off before risking any serious pushback or engagement when they interact with you.

2) I don't understand what you're talking about here. And you still haven't explained A) Why Brigand's post was townish or B) Your previous read of me.

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:09 am
by Hopkirk
The guy who went out of his way to claim Villager is definitely saying he read people as town
due to his role
?

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:09 am
by Brian Skies
In post 974, Ausuka wrote:
In post 969, Brian Skies wrote:
In post 947, Ausuka wrote:
In post 946, Brian Skies wrote:
In post 911, Ausuka wrote:well, this is the account I use permanently now, but yeah.
That posting style Quick quoted looks familiar to me. Would I be accurate if I said we've played together before?
Yeah. We played together in alisae's beneath the mask game, where I was in the chikoritas hydra with echovision, and we were masons with davesaz.
Heh. Not my first guess but I'll take it.
just out of curiosity, who was your first guess?
Alisae, but I'm not sure why.

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:10 am
by Panopticon
In post 989, Hopkirk wrote:The guy who went out of his way to claim Villager is definitely saying he read people as town
due to his role
?
Same

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:10 am
by Centipede Syndrome
okay

all of you need to think like a crazy person and you'll see what quick's thinking

quick needs to think like a normal person and then he'll realize what he's thinking is wrong

lmao

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:11 am
by Ausuka
In post 990, Brian Skies wrote:
In post 974, Ausuka wrote:
In post 969, Brian Skies wrote:
In post 947, Ausuka wrote:
In post 946, Brian Skies wrote:
In post 911, Ausuka wrote:well, this is the account I use permanently now, but yeah.
That posting style Quick quoted looks familiar to me. Would I be accurate if I said we've played together before?
Yeah. We played together in alisae's beneath the mask game, where I was in the chikoritas hydra with echovision, and we were masons with davesaz.
Heh. Not my first guess but I'll take it.
just out of curiosity, who was your first guess?
Alisae, but I'm not sure why.
Oh, lol. I don't think I really post like alisae :lol:

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:11 am
by Toranaga
ok tchill/centi/screenplay are wagons I believe in

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:12 am
by Toranaga
In post 992, Centipede Syndrome wrote:okay

all of you need to think like a crazy person and you'll see what quick's thinking

quick needs to think like a normal person and then he'll realize what he's thinking is wrong

lmao
are you a jester?

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:13 am
by Panopticon
I've got to head to work soon, I'll be back tonight and
HOPEFULLY MY HYDRA PARTNER WILL POST BY THEN


~The Observer

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:13 am
by Panopticon
UNVOTE:

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:13 am
by Centipede Syndrome
In post 995, Toranaga wrote:
In post 992, Centipede Syndrome wrote:okay

all of you need to think like a crazy person and you'll see what quick's thinking

quick needs to think like a normal person and then he'll realize what he's thinking is wrong

lmao
are you a jester?
lol you can see me play as jester in jester nightless
its on my wiki

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:14 am
by Hopkirk
In post 988, Brian Skies wrote:
In post 952, Hopkirk wrote:1.) Why does scum me push people then 'back off'? What do I gain there? Think about actual scum motivation before saying it's scummy since scum have no incentive to do that. You're scumreading style rather than motive.
Why can't town me like responses? Why do I not move on to other people when I'm happy with what I have?

2.) The initial engagement wasn't leading anywhere. Not sure why you think it's scummy to try and make it something meaningful.
1) Because it makes it seem look like you're engaging and trying to sort people. Or that maybe they should townread you or ignore you when you back off before risking any serious pushback or engagement when they interact with you.

2) I don't understand what you're talking about here. And you still haven't explained A) Why Brigand's post was townish or B) Your previous read of me.
1.) Better ways to look like I'm engaging people is to legitimately engage people. Your 'push back' looks like it was based on the original scumread of you so I gain nothing there either. Scum me doesn't bother wasting time trying to get scumread.
2.) I don't even remember these things since that was pretty much the large version of RVS.

If you're 'pushing back hard' then why are the only things you're referencing throwaway posts from 40+ pages ago?