Mafiascum.net

In post 973, Nibbui wrote:what if we actually get scum right on d1 and just quick lynch the other one on d2 though?

wouldn't that be like...just sad?

I'm expecting this to reach 100 pages at least

maybe we should lynch you D2 just to make the game longer

In post 971, podoboq wrote:

In post 970, Nibbui wrote:I wonder if that's positive...

No. It's god awful.

What...?

In your alt you seemed to like shitposting a bit more

join us sir

In post 972, the worst wrote:we're dealing with scum!mastina so that'll help pad things out!

oh look shenanigans of a 1v1

In post 975, the worst wrote:

In post 973, Nibbui wrote:what if we actually get scum right on d1 and just quick lynch the other one on d2 though?

wouldn't that be like...just sad?

I'm expecting this to reach 100 pages at least

maybe we should lynch you D2 just to make the game longer

like

that's not a bad idea

these guys thinking about playing for their win con just don't get it

we live for the memes

imagine we locking the scum team only to begin mislynch town for the lolz?

it would deserve a kodak moment although this year it's going to be the mastina video for sure

hmmm

Infinite needs replacement I guess, 4 days off already

It's weird though, I saw him posting in the queue that his *team* would be bringing up games (he was going to mod).

I was like, expecting him to stay around?

Maybe it's a impression but I don't see as much new players as there is in the newbie games in other queues

I mean, sure, newbies will play in the newbie queue but after playing some games most don't go around the site that much, it's pretty sad really

Also I wonder if I should still consider myself a newbie or if I should consider myself semi-experienced?

good question

In post 973, Nibbui wrote:what if we actually get scum right on d1 and just quick lynch the other one on d2 though?

This literally just happened in my game that just finished with sheep!

Hey guys, addendum to "I've never played with anyone here." I just finished a game with sheep. I thought he was town in my other game, but I was wrong. He looks the same to me in this game, so I'm less confident in my townread on sheep. I'll explore that more some other time.

look I know all this fluflly from me is annoying but shitposting helps me get in the mood to be productive again

As a trivia fact I sort of wanted to roll scum here against this playerlist, but I'm fine with being town as well I guess

also the sample role of worm townie is funny schadd

In post 979, podoboq wrote:

In post 973, Nibbui wrote:what if we actually get scum right on d1 and just quick lynch the other one on d2 though?

This literally just happened in my game that just finished with sheep!

Hey guys, addendum to "I've never played with anyone here." I just finished a game with sheep. I thought he was town in my other game, but I was wrong. He looks the same to me in this game, so I'm less confident in my townread on sheep. I'll explore that more some other time.

oh that game finished?

that's good I guess

Let's all pray for someone relatively easy to sort replaces infinite soda as well

I don't want to read many more games than I already need to

Hmmm

trivia fact I wanted to play a newbie game.

It's fun to play with completely unknown players that can't have meta used against, although it's way easier to mislynch someone for playstyle issues rather than real scumminess

the fact I'm on an alt is troublesome though, also there's 36 hours prodge and I don't know if I'll have as much time as I've now next week

I guess I'll only be able to play newbie games from the dead thread mostly...

ok last fluffly post

I want to drink a lot in New Year

my mafiascum.net objective next year is to lynch scum but I'm not confident I can

also I want to roll scum once to see if I can get as town read as scum as I'm town read nowadays as town

I miss marathon games where I rolled scum every time although back then I wasn't in the mood to play scum.

I mean yeah, playing scum is kind of boring sometimes but I'm growing more fond of it

My favorite alignment is SK though because not only I can kill whoever I want at night, I can scum hunt as well and can try to manipulate town.

It's like, the ultimate fun role

if someone here ever mod a game I'm in, and there's a SK role in the setuo, give to me please, screw the "randomly assigned" ethic rule

deal. <3
my mafiascum new year resolution is similar to my irl new year resolution but also I wanna get better at modding (and probably play less )

I modded a lot in the last marathon days and it's somewhat fun knowing everything but I'm not so sure if it's something I would constantly like to do

hmmmm

ok it's official, let me go back on doing stuff

VOTE: schadd

the game is bastard though

I just had a mind blown

I'm sad that I don't have scum reads yet

I want to lock a lynch order and just shitpost until they get lynched

this is too hard

i'm not overwhelmingly Feeling It either which is weirddd

ok so I've shenanigans that two 1v1 is happening from here

one of them I'll find particularly dumb but it doesn't mean it's AI

it'll probably be AI but still dumb

but it doesn't mean it's not AI***

It'll be probably be AI.

In post 885, podoboq wrote:As a person who hasn't played on site in a long time, and doesn't usually play more than one game at a time, all this talk of meta is going from mildly annoying to seriously frustrating.

it's ok it's beginning to frustrate me too
+ some people's playstyles in this game are beginning to annoy me as well

==

i don't like any of the podoboq votes

==

In post 904, sheepsaysmeep wrote:@tw wrt the skitter meta you linked

i think her villagery type of posting walls is better than i'd expected from her and i was kinda? underestimating her w game

but i think here theres a lot mroe genuine interacging/engaging with people and solving and she's still lean v after skimming that it's just a bit weaker

ye i know how to write things that sound townie; being townie in like a generically townie way doesn't mean much for me

==

In post 908, Mephistophanes 39 wrote:

In post 903, sheepsaysmeep wrote:i kinda skipped the last 2 pages so far will read them later

why the fuck does everything happen while im not here

So sheep, when are you planning to correctly read us?

why do you think he's incorrectly reading you?
(reminder, you don't have to quote this entire post to answer this)

==

In post 913, Mephistophanes 39 wrote:Only a “lean” V? Her thought process here, seems pretty damn townie.

In post 916, Mephistophanes 39 wrote:Skitter
Nibbul
Pink Ball
The Worst

I’m currently feeling the best about, so far.

i don't understand why you're townreading me so hard

==

In post 918, podoboq wrote:

In post 872, mastina wrote:

In post 4, skitter30 wrote:first! hello all!

@mod: regular vla on fridays/saturdays

VOTE: nibbui

This was an entirely clinical RVS entrance--it is constructed, rather than organic. There was an overall lack of whimsy to it, and no real lighthearted touch. However, skitter is a more logical-type player, so while I wasn't fond of it, I recognized that because of who made the post, it wasn't as scum-indicative as I'd otherwise be inclined to think. This still earned skitter a low place on my readslist, below the nulline, but only just.

And it's not just her read on me. This is useless too. These

tone reads

are nothing, and are based on literally one post, and mastina's clearly flawed

assumptions

about other players.

yeah i didn't like it either because it's how i start prob ~half my games, depending on if there's content when i make my first post

it's not constructed, and for me, i would argue that it's whimsical and lighthearted in comparison to my regular posting style (hello walls!)

and i don't dont' like her saying 'it wasn't *as* scum-indicative' as i'd otherwise be inclined to think' because i literally pulled four examples of me doing that in my towngames (i didn't check my scumgames); i don't think it's scum-indicative at all for me (and she's applying this standard to me in particular)

==

In post 935, Nibbui wrote:VOTE: sheep

why are you voting sheep here?

==

In post 943, mastina wrote:Btw, skitter's 722 is the first post of skitter's which I've had any feeling on at all, pretty much--and it was positive. I liked it; it wasn't something stellar, but it made me feel loosely town there. 724 actually gives me similarly good vibes, too.

the fact that the two posts of mine that give you a 'postive feeling' are ones where i'm suspicious of your biggest scumread is a little disturbing

==

In post 953, mastina wrote:Well I don't know how to help because I don't understand the confusion to be had. Nibbui is playing this game precisely how I'd expect Nibbui to play as town. I don't know how that'd be in any way subjective or ambiguous. It's exactly what it says.

yeah but that doesn't actually mean anything to me
that would be like me saying: the sky is blue because blue is the color of the sky
which may be true but isn't helpful to explain why the sky is blue

==

In post 958, mastina wrote:

His reads closely mirror those of the worst, in a way that no other players' reads have,

and then when you did the sheep scumread, the reactions of podoboq and the worst were atrocious to it.

i mean how often do scum actually do this? i can't remember an example of one scum-member literally exactly mimicing the reads of their partner and then having their partner lampshade it

i really don'tt hink this is partner-indicative; like i don't think scum are as blatant about working together and having the same agenda as you seem to be portraying the pod/tw team

VOTE: Mephistophanes 39

pretty sure that's the third vote

In post 992, skitter30 wrote:VOTE: Mephistophanes 39

pretty sure that's the third vote

Why?

In post 993, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 992, skitter30 wrote:VOTE: Mephistophanes 39

pretty sure that's the third vote

Why?

Like you didn’t give a single reason for that vote.

Did you only vote us because we already had two votes on us?

In post 991, skitter30 wrote:

In post 885, podoboq wrote:As a person who hasn't played on site in a long time, and doesn't usually play more than one game at a time, all this talk of meta is going from mildly annoying to seriously frustrating.

it's ok it's beginning to frustrate me too
+ some people's playstyles in this game are beginning to annoy me as well

==

i don't like any of the podoboq votes

==

In post 904, sheepsaysmeep wrote:@tw wrt the skitter meta you linked

i think her villagery type of posting walls is better than i'd expected from her and i was kinda? underestimating her w game

but i think here theres a lot mroe genuine interacging/engaging with people and solving and she's still lean v after skimming that it's just a bit weaker

ye i know how to write things that sound townie; being townie in like a generically townie way doesn't mean much for me

==

In post 908, Mephistophanes 39 wrote:

In post 903, sheepsaysmeep wrote:i kinda skipped the last 2 pages so far will read them later

why the fuck does everything happen while im not here

So sheep, when are you planning to correctly read us?

why do you think he's incorrectly reading you?
(reminder, you don't have to quote this entire post to answer this)

==

In post 913, Mephistophanes 39 wrote:Only a “lean” V? Her thought process here, seems pretty damn townie.

In post 916, Mephistophanes 39 wrote:Skitter
Nibbul
Pink Ball
The Worst

I’m currently feeling the best about, so far.

i don't understand why you're townreading me so hard

==

In post 918, podoboq wrote:

In post 872, mastina wrote:

In post 4, skitter30 wrote:first! hello all!

@mod: regular vla on fridays/saturdays

VOTE: nibbui

This was an entirely clinical RVS entrance--it is constructed, rather than organic. There was an overall lack of whimsy to it, and no real lighthearted touch. However, skitter is a more logical-type player, so while I wasn't fond of it, I recognized that because of who made the post, it wasn't as scum-indicative as I'd otherwise be inclined to think. This still earned skitter a low place on my readslist, below the nulline, but only just.

And it's not just her read on me. This is useless too. These

tone reads

are nothing, and are based on literally one post, and mastina's clearly flawed

assumptions

about other players.

yeah i didn't like it either because it's how i start prob ~half my games, depending on if there's content when i make my first post

it's not constructed, and for me, i would argue that it's whimsical and lighthearted in comparison to my regular posting style (hello walls!)

and i don't dont' like her saying 'it wasn't *as* scum-indicative' as i'd otherwise be inclined to think' because i literally pulled four examples of me doing that in my towngames (i didn't check my scumgames); i don't think it's scum-indicative at all for me (and she's applying this standard to me in particular)

==

In post 935, Nibbui wrote:VOTE: sheep

why are you voting sheep here?

==

In post 943, mastina wrote:Btw, skitter's 722 is the first post of skitter's which I've had any feeling on at all, pretty much--and it was positive. I liked it; it wasn't something stellar, but it made me feel loosely town there. 724 actually gives me similarly good vibes, too.

the fact that the two posts of mine that give you a 'postive feeling' are ones where i'm suspicious of your biggest scumread is a little disturbing

==

In post 953, mastina wrote:Well I don't know how to help because I don't understand the confusion to be had. Nibbui is playing this game precisely how I'd expect Nibbui to play as town. I don't know how that'd be in any way subjective or ambiguous. It's exactly what it says.

yeah but that doesn't actually mean anything to me
that would be like me saying: the sky is blue because blue is the color of the sky
which may be true but isn't helpful to explain why the sky is blue

==

In post 958, mastina wrote:

His reads closely mirror those of the worst, in a way that no other players' reads have,

and then when you did the sheep scumread, the reactions of podoboq and the worst were atrocious to it.

i mean how often do scum actually do this? i can't remember an example of one scum-member literally exactly mimicing the reads of their partner and then having their partner lampshade it

i really don'tt hink this is partner-indicative; like i don't think scum are as blatant about working together and having the same agenda as you seem to be portraying the pod/tw team

Well I obviously could be wrong about my read on you. As for sheep, he should be able to tell that this is my town meta.

b/c your townread on me is like mysteriously strong + still bad vibes from nsg + idk where else to vote + you haven't done anything townie

I’m sorry guys, I’ve really been trying my best - despite being overgamed and unwell. I also signed up to play in a hydra but so far, I’m the only one carrying this slot. :/

~Nancy

;

;