Mafiascum.net

I believe those slots will be much more readable later.

I would rather have enough reason to believe there's scum there before lynching within that group.

i'm actually mildly townreading Flubber here. it's not that strong but he does have strong opinions even if they aren't explained very much.
are you townread the rest of the list to some extent?

of the three there i think tictac is the one i think is most likely scum just by virtue of a lack of towntelling.

townread confidence is somewhere like:
Enter
Ankamius
skitter/u2

but skitter might be higher, i don't know. i'm happy with the Enter townread for sure. it's a start.

In post 976, Chara wrote:i'm actually mildly townreading Flubber here. it's not that strong but he does have strong opinions even if they aren't explained very much.
are you townread the rest of the list to some extent?

no, I'm not townreading all 9 other players

But I don't think I want to lynch in {Chara, Brig, Elbirn} right now

In post 918, u r a person 2 wrote:Order is meaningless

Spoiler: reads list

town
tris
skitter30
Enter
Ankamius
xRECKONERx
NotMySpamAccount



not town
Brigitte
tictac
Nimueh
Flubbernugget
Chara
Elbirn Lady Angel

this is still accurate for me

What makes you town read flubbeR?

In post 974, u r a person 2 wrote:{Tictac, Nimueh, Flubber} are the slots I think I prefer to lynch today.

Let's start here?

VOTE: tictac

why start a new wagon when there's already a vote on nim

actually yeah

VOTE: tictac

Fuck it

VOTE: tictac

This is a complete waste of time but I don't care enough to fight it

In post 849, skitter30 wrote:i feel like there's something wonky in your logic somewhere or that i'm missing something in this convo but i'm a little too tired rn to sort out what's bothering me exactly rn, so i think i'm just going to drop this specific line of inquiry until i figure it out

p-edit @ank

Not fully caught up but I wanted to get back to this

Remember how many times urap was scum reading nmsa but still tried to get wagons going elsewhere?

I can be taken off V/LA, please and thank you.

In post 982, xRECKONERx wrote:

@mod it has been 4 days since LA or Nim have posted. by your own rules, they shouldve been marked for replacement over 24 hours ago

In post 935, u r a person 2 wrote:@Brigitte I think I'm scum reading this fake hammer in particular. What do you think?

In post 765, Flubbernugget wrote:VOTE: nmsa

You've had one scum read the whole game that was wrong, and this is the best you can do to find scum? Shade a blatant troll vote based on the first fake hammer?

You're not gamesolving because you can't gamesolve because you're scum.

VOTE: urap

oh yay hi elbirn

Are you still mad that i dont scumhunt with preflips?

Here's scum #3, folks

We did it

That's a yes

I'm def mad

I'm shaking in my boots in outrage

In post 985, Flubbernugget wrote:

In post 849, skitter30 wrote:i feel like there's something wonky in your logic somewhere or that i'm missing something in this convo but i'm a little too tired rn to sort out what's bothering me exactly rn, so i think i'm just going to drop this specific line of inquiry until i figure it out

p-edit @ank

Not fully caught up but I wanted to get back to this

Remember how many times urap was scum reading nmsa but still tried to get wagons going elsewhere?

yeah, still townreading Flubber. this game has a lot of mislynch material he could go for, it feels like. if tictac flips scum i would look back to Flubber here but for the most part he seems to be doing his own thing and has a consistent logic based on his u2 read.

before this i just thought he was townier than not due to his attitude and a lack of what feels like positioning.

like, does scum Flubber decide to vote u2 here if it's not a partner chainsaw?
i don't think it's that likely. if tictac is scum it's a different story but we're not there yet.
i find all the fakehammers null and don't know if i care that much about it. Flubber isn't very verbose in general so the lack of explanation doesn't ping me in a particular way.

In post 996, Chara wrote:like, does scum Flubber decide to vote u2 here if it's not a partner chainsaw?
i don't think it's that likely. if tictac is scum it's a different story but we're not there yet.
i find all the fakehammers null and don't know if i care that much about it. Flubber isn't very verbose in general so the lack of explanation doesn't ping me in a particular way.

because that's the trajectory he established for himself earlier in his ISO

his ISO is pretty barebones even for how little he's been around and it looks like he's putting on a show more than actually trying to sort people

and the way he went about this latest vote is just...

not natural

So, you're mad about my trajectory being "established" but not the player who can't fake a trajectory (and has been unable to the entire game)?

See, this is why people are frustrated about your playstyle. Because you have nothing to gain by holding stupid conclusions to your chest other than making it harder for other people to read you.

what's your read on Ankamius?