Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 10:30 am
Lol i bet you're getting a headache right about now Datisi.
Sure he unvoted immediately, but that's definitely not something a scum partner would do.In post 90, Map Wolf wrote:VOTE: Norwegian
Don't really like 67 and 75. I don't see how GBJ finding you suspicious makes him scum.
I'm not following here, for some reason, can you rephrase that?In post 978, NorwegianboyEE wrote: What i can say to my defense is, assuming i'm scum... why would scum!me immediately claim VT and go heads to toe with town!Phoenix over claiming mason and trying to convince town!Ph0enix to vote you Datisi (a much more mislynchable player)? I may play recklessly sometimes, but there's no reason why scum!me would make such a bad play.
Doesn't that have to do with playstyle, though?In post 978, NorwegianboyEE wrote:He does play it safe though, as i pointed out when i first saw him. He's never done anything controversial that shows genuine resolve in solving the game, all his posts are presented very matter of factly and with some sprinkled in light questioning.
So if you fake claim Mason:In post 983, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Assuming i am in fact scum... why would scum!me at the beginning of D4 immediately claim VT and argue with town!Phoenix whom would be the real VT in this scenario, rather than instead fake claim mason and try to convince town!Ph0enix to vote Datisi (whom is a much more mislynchable player). Theoretical scum!me is unlikely to make the play i did today, therefore it indicates i am town.
You voted Map Wolf to L-1 when it already seemed inevitable he would be lynched, a wagon which was already started by Datisi whom i joined immediately because i genuinely reflected on whether my reads were wrong.In post 388, Ph0enix wrote:It doesn't seem as if we're going to get information from him otherwise at this point. I gave him plenty of time to answer my questions.In post 384, Datisi wrote:can someone put them on L-1 so we can get a claim or sth?
VOTE: GBJ
This is L-1.
And then you voted me because that was the only choice left for you at this point.In post 733, Ph0enix wrote:In post 686, Ph0enix wrote: To all three of my scumreads: What are your thoughts about the game right now? Reads, anything else you want to share? And given that we're 28 pages in I would like, not shotgun reads or something. I think it's not much to ask.a more thorough answer"(Non Imh), (Ph0enix), (NorwegianboyEE)Map Wolf wrote: Sorry thatI don't have much to say, but.I really don't know how to place people in this game beyond my earlier readlist
(), (Naerys)Datisi
" ---> Scumread? Hello?(Saladman27)
...Map Wolf wrote:VOTE: Datisi
For fuck's sake.
VOTE: Map Wolf
This is L-1.
Ignoring the last vote, you've been coasting the entire game and held few original opinions of your own. And you've never risked your neck. That is the play of someone that wants to go by unseen, not solve the game.
If I vote someone, you can be damn sure there's a good reason for it. And how did you "risk your neck", as you say? If you're referring to your votes left and right in order to obtain information, I don't see how that's more effective than my method.In post 986, NorwegianboyEE wrote: Ignoring the last vote, you've been coasting the entire game and held few original opinions of your own. And you've never risked your neck. That is the play of someone that wants to go by unseen, not solve the game.
It's not particularly good, I have to agree with that one.In post 987, NorwegianboyEE wrote:And take a look at Jackson's ISO. that is one of the most awful ISO's i've ever seen. There's nothing more than fluff.
And that isn't town indicative for you?In post 988, Ph0enix wrote:If you're referring to your votes left and right in order to obtain information,
I'm saying what you are referring to, not what I think they were for.In post 990, NorwegianboyEE wrote:And that isn't town indicative for you?In post 988, Ph0enix wrote:If you're referring to your votes left and right in order to obtain information,
The mere fact that you're saying my votes were intended for information gathering suggests you know they were made with a town intention in mind. You're scumslipping.
Cause one could easily defend himself by saying that they were made in order to obtain information.In post 992, Ph0enix wrote:I'm saying what you are referring to, not what I think they were for.In post 990, NorwegianboyEE wrote:And that isn't town indicative for you?In post 988, Ph0enix wrote:If you're referring to your votes left and right in order to obtain information,
The mere fact that you're saying my votes were intended for information gathering suggests you know they were made with a town intention in mind. You're scumslipping.
No, it didn't much. Until now where i'm actually analyzing him more deeply to figure out how he slipped past everyone's radar.In post 991, Datisi wrote:Norway, I'm kinda skimming through parts of the game, you've been calling Ph0enix "unmistakingly Town" until like late Day 2. Did his play not ping you before?
In post 673, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I keep thinking back on Map Wolf. No attempt at solving, just sheeping reads lists and opinions. I think Map Wolf could be a good alternative here.
In post 687, NorwegianboyEE wrote:If we go purely by activity as a scumtell then Map Wolf is the scummiest by far. I could see scum!him looking at the gamestate and deciding to hide in the shadows by saying absolutely nothing of value, hoping town will forget about him.
In post 704, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Honestly i'd prefer Map Wolf today though, feels like he's been popping in only at convenient moments where he feels the need to defend himself, but not actually contribute much to the solving of the game.
Because i would have waited until either one of you had claimed and then gauged my opinions. Because scum or town, anyone could figure out that there would be exactly 1 town, 1 mason and one scum. So if scum waits they can choose and pick who they'd go against.