Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2020 6:02 pm
im seriously lmao putting this together
Page 40 of 58
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2020 6:04 pm
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2020 6:08 pm
In post 961, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:Then make your vote stick with it and let's move on with the day. The fact that you have to pull "I've played with so many alts. Just yeah. Don't trust me my votes on pops the only read I trust. Amrun I still feel is scum and yeah notice the hydra has been quiet.
- Is this a joke?
- My vote is mine - you don't have as much control of others as you may like or believe.
- I didn't think I was "pulling" anything.
- Is this supposed to make me think that you've been drinking?
- I'm very unfamiliar with this strategy.
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2020 6:12 pm
Looker is taking my heart on a roller coaster with his avatar
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2020 3:02 am
Rawr
What did I miss?
-Summer
What did I miss?
-Summer
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2020 5:02 am
He feels pretty different from G&R I to me.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2020 5:06 am
Ame is null leaning scum for me because some of their stuff seems super agenda-driven but that could just be the methodical way they play.In post 962, Amrun wrote:Do you have a strong read on Ame? If so, what is it?
But like I said before, I have three townreads, and if they're all right, we can win by heavening them. If they're NOT all right, I want to know sooner rather than later. So I don't want to heaven a question mark.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2020 5:09 am
pops you were in my dream!
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2020 5:10 am
@S_S what do you feel has been agenda-driven? I feel I've been really open
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2020 5:13 am
It feels like you haven't tried to empathize with me at all, like you've been holding onto your read because you need to
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2020 5:20 am
All throughout yesterday you seemed very focused on getting people to agree with your reads and vote with you. Whereas I don't see you trying to understand other people's reads or work together with anyone very much.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2020 5:22 am
You're doing it now, which is good, but "open" is not the opposite of "agenda-driven."
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2020 5:40 am
Huh? Could you point what specifically gave you that impression. This is weird to me because I didn't feel confident about anyone with the time and pretty flexible on who I would vote if it came down to it. The only time I recall asking if people would vote with me was on you, and that wasn't trying to "
get
people to agree with me" it was more trying to see if
there was agreement and we could come to a consensus in what I felt was the best direction. And while I haven't expressed them specifically, I have been evaluating other people's reads and taking them into account: specifically, the town reads on implosion, the town reads on Elmo, and I've been eager to hear the conclusion pop's and implosion come to on your slot as they've both expressed you'd be more readable as the game progresses.Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2020 6:24 am
You asking people if they would vote me is one one of the things I was thinking of, yes. Because it very much treated your reads as a given and tried to shape the game according to that, rather than trying to create a dialogue on me (or with me) to sort me.
As I said this could be playstyle but I think I, and probably at least a decent amount of town players in that situation, would instead of asking "who would vote S_S?" be asking "how do people feel about S_S?" Yeah you were trying to see if there was agreement, but you followed it up with "S_S has done seriously nothing." so it really looks like you're trying to sway people into agreeing with you.
Another example would be 825, where you seemed pretty deadset on lynching anyone that wasn't wooper (though I don't think you ever came out and said that). I said a LOT of interesting things during those few hours before deadline and I don't think you ever really asked why or tried to understand, you were just concerned with whether we could make sure we lynch someone that you wanted to lynch.
As I said this could be playstyle but I think I, and probably at least a decent amount of town players in that situation, would instead of asking "who would vote S_S?" be asking "how do people feel about S_S?" Yeah you were trying to see if there was agreement, but you followed it up with "S_S has done seriously nothing." so it really looks like you're trying to sway people into agreeing with you.
Another example would be 825, where you seemed pretty deadset on lynching anyone that wasn't wooper (though I don't think you ever came out and said that). I said a LOT of interesting things during those few hours before deadline and I don't think you ever really asked why or tried to understand, you were just concerned with whether we could make sure we lynch someone that you wanted to lynch.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2020 6:30 am
I was going to post something but frustration got the best from me today and words are all blurred. Ill have some thoughts hopefully later today.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2020 7:17 am
It's possible you missed a quotation mark after "alts". I think that would've changed the interpretation of your post.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2020 7:25 am
That makes a lot of sense! I'm starting to see now. You've been rubbing me the wrong way because of the exact opposite reason: passivity / not asserting yourself. I think it may be a difference in personality as I've gotten these same things before [1, 2], the latter of which came from someone who plays in a similarly passive way as you.In post 988, Something_Smart wrote:You asking people if they would vote me is one one of the things I was thinking of, yes. Because it very much treated your reads as a given and tried to shape the game according to that, rather than trying to create a dialogue on me (or with me) to sort me.
As I said this could be playstyle but I think I, and probably at least a decent amount of town players in that situation, would instead of asking "who would vote S_S?" be asking "how do people feel about S_S?" Yeah you were trying to see if there was agreement, but you followed it up with "S_S has done seriously nothing." so it really looks like you're trying to sway people into agreeing with you.
Another example would be 825, where you seemed pretty deadset on lynching anyone that wasn't wooper (though I don't think you ever came out and said that). I said a LOT of interesting things during those few hours before deadline and I don't think you ever really asked why or tried to understand, you were just concerned with whether we could make sure we lynch someone that you wanted to lynch.
"Who would vote" and "how do people feel" are the same thing to me, they are both an attempt to draw out stances. I find the former more valuable, however, because it forces people to commit whereas people can just say how they feel without actually doing anything.
Deadline hours I was on mobile and in the midst of TAing a class. I wasn't at all concerned with sorting you at that time, I was just trying to make sure my vote was being utilized. (I have since then been sorting btw, it's just been behind the scenes. I've spent the past couple of days reading through you, pops, and Am. I got caught up in autobattler, but I'm currently in the midst of G&R and G&RII).
How come you haven't asked me elaborate on anything? You're of the opinion of creating dialogue to sort, but you haven't reached out to me.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2020 7:35 am
But the first doesn't cover the much more important underlying question which is not WHO would you vote but WHY would you vote them.In post 991, Ame wrote:"Who would vote" and "how do people feel" are the same thing to me, they are both an attempt to draw out stances. I find the former more valuable, however, because it forces people to commit whereas people can just say how they feel without actually doing anything.
I can definitely buy that it's a playstyle clash. You wouldn't be the first person my playstyle has clashed with (hi pops
)Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2020 7:36 am
S_S seems scummy this page. The characterization of Ame is so weird and different from how he has actually played this game, Ame seems under-opinionated if anything.
This is the second time he has pushed a townblock of his own conclusion with all the empathy of a three year old pointing at a picture in a book when you sit across from her and can only see the cover. Implosion is one of S_S's townreads and he did not townblock implosion. It seems like an over the top way of demonstrating S_S must be town because he can presumptively mark himself green in townblocks but I feel like he wouldn't be that poor as town at making sure he was arguing something everyone would onboard to. The people out of the townblock will not subscribe, implo didn't state a townread on him, looker did not state a townread on him, Elmo I don't remember, but hi elmo.
I oppose an implo heaven because I think he's too readable day3 and too towny already. He might end up being a compromise but it just feels like it only revokes his posting privileges to me (and makes him a vig, which is fine)
I'm glad I was in ame's dream.
Pedit: omg ame is some kind of high effort monster wow
VOTE: Elmo
There's too many other considerations to toss this over concerns about her readskill. I will believe in Elmo. An Elmo redflip would be significant
This is the second time he has pushed a townblock of his own conclusion with all the empathy of a three year old pointing at a picture in a book when you sit across from her and can only see the cover. Implosion is one of S_S's townreads and he did not townblock implosion. It seems like an over the top way of demonstrating S_S must be town because he can presumptively mark himself green in townblocks but I feel like he wouldn't be that poor as town at making sure he was arguing something everyone would onboard to. The people out of the townblock will not subscribe, implo didn't state a townread on him, looker did not state a townread on him, Elmo I don't remember, but hi elmo.
I oppose an implo heaven because I think he's too readable day3 and too towny already. He might end up being a compromise but it just feels like it only revokes his posting privileges to me (and makes him a vig, which is fine)
I'm glad I was in ame's dream.
Pedit: omg ame is some kind of high effort monster wow
VOTE: Elmo
There's too many other considerations to toss this over concerns about her readskill. I will believe in Elmo. An Elmo redflip would be significant
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2020 7:37 am
I felt pretty disconnected and tilted by the wooper mislynch, not least because he's my friend and I actually felt really bad about killing himIn post 991, Ame wrote:How come you haven't asked me elaborate on anything? You're of the opinion of creating dialogue to sort, but you haven't reached out to me.
And plus I'm anticipating that nobody will want to listen to what wooper said because that's how mislynched people are generally treated, and I'm not looking forward to it.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2020 7:38 am
Huh? Implosion is in my townblock...In post 993, popsofctown wrote:This is the second time he has pushed a townblock of his own conclusion with all the empathy of a three year old pointing at a picture in a book when you sit across from her and can only see the cover. Implosion is one of S_S's townreads and he did not townblock implosion.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2020 7:39 am
I probably wouldn't be opposed to voting Elmo.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2020 7:55 am
Ebwop, Implosion did not townblock S_S
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2020 8:18 am
I don't really consider that a big issue at present. I think implosion knows me well enough to eventually get a correct read on me.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2020 8:21 am
But the discussion regards an immediate heavening decision?