Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 12:01 pm
i don't know yet
i don't have a good enough grasp on the gamestate yet
i don't have a good enough grasp on the gamestate yet
Ok. So you think a vote itself has basic pressure value, even if it’s announced as a pressure vote?In post 972, skitter30 wrote:it's not like i waltzed in and was like
vote: chemist
this is a pressure vote !!!!
later somebody asked me to explain it and they said that town!chemist doesn't respond super well to pressure that way so i unvoted
i'm not sure what you're asking/expecting of me here
bingle is partly explained in 603, and partly while i am often a very good pocket, scum usually isn't this blatantly blatant about itIn post 971, Menalque wrote:can you try to explain these ones to me pls?In post 967, Datisi wrote:bingle town
lil/PB/blake probtown
i remember at one point saying to myself "townpoints to maria" for something
hi, yeah, you keep giving me 892 vibes for whatever reason. also like in 856 i asked you something and that's got ignored (though others have ignored my question from that post too so maybe it's not you who knows) but 10 posts later you're spamming questions and it kinda feels like busyowrk and i don't like it.In post 974, Menalque wrote:hi, menalque, have we met?In post 967, Datisi wrote:you feel weirdly "tryhard" in an odd way and i'm not sure what to make of it
But you didn’t vote when announcing it as pressure, your unvote came later. Which means you think that a vote has inherent pressure, right?In post 977, skitter30 wrote:gobble i unvoted just about the time i said it was a pressure vote
i didn't say it was a pressure vote when i voted
I want to understand her opinion on pressure votes. I don’t think votes have inherent pressure. I think votes only have pressure if they have basis.In post 979, lilith2013 wrote:Gobbles, where are you trying to go with this questioning? What purpose does it serve/how is it helping you sort skitter?
Ok why not vote any of the other names that have no read next to them on your list?In post 984, skitter30 wrote:because i didn't know where else to vote so i just voted there while i try to sort it out
i posted my reads at just about the same time and if you notice i said i didn't have scumreads really on anyone other than ss and i wanted to take a step back there
I mean isn’t it a little? You said to Menalque you were going to vote there again if he doesn’t give you/Menalque what you want. Plus you also quoted his YouTube trash thing with a similar type comment.In post 984, skitter30 wrote:i feel like you're treating this as a permanent / intent-to-wagon vote when that's not what it was, and i feel like i've been clear as to just what kind of vote it was
It helps me understand skitter’s point of view on ChemistIn post 987, Menalque wrote:why is it so important if it was a pressure vote or not?
okay, but what about those 3 gives you gut reads on them and not on others? like what in their posting has given you those gut reads?In post 978, Datisi wrote:bingle is partly explained in 603, and partly while i am often a very good pocket, scum usually isn't this blatantly blatant about itIn post 971, Menalque wrote:can you try to explain these ones to me pls?In post 967, Datisi wrote:bingle town
lil/PB/blake probtown
i remember at one point saying to myself "townpoints to maria" for something
all the others are Gut(tm)
hi, yeah, you keep giving me 892 vibes for whatever reason. also like in 856 i asked you something and that's got ignored (though others have ignored my question from that post too so maybe it's not you who knows) but 10 posts later you're spamming questions and it kinda feels like busyowrk and i don't like it.In post 974, Menalque wrote:hi, menalque, have we met?In post 967, Datisi wrote:you feel weirdly "tryhard" in an odd way and i'm not sure what to make of it
why do you think you're struggling to get a grasp on the gamestate, skitt?In post 989, gobbledygook wrote:It helps me understand skitter’s point of view on ChemistIn post 987, Menalque wrote:why is it so important if it was a pressure vote or not?
would it still be gut reads if i were able to explain it with logic and whatnot?In post 990, Menalque wrote:okay, but what about those 3 gives you gut reads on them and not on others? like what in their posting has given you those gut reads?
I don't want it explained with logic, but like if I'm giving a gut read I can normally still point to which posts helped contribute to it and give an idea of what it was that was in them that hit me one way or another, so I'm just looking for that basicallyIn post 993, Datisi wrote:would it still be gut reads if i were able to explain it with logic and whatnot?In post 990, Menalque wrote:okay, but what about those 3 gives you gut reads on them and not on others? like what in their posting has given you those gut reads?
also, your readslist better be damn good how much you're hyping it up.
i don't knowIn post 992, Menalque wrote:why do you think you're struggling to get a grasp on the gamestate, skitt?
In post 993, Datisi wrote:would it still be gut reads if i were able to explain it with logic and whatnot?In post 990, Menalque wrote:okay, but what about those 3 gives you gut reads on them and not on others? like what in their posting has given you those gut reads?
also, your readslist better be damn good how much you're hyping it up.
Regarding the last line, you’d be surprised how much that happens.In post 994, Datisi wrote:ignore the last period now it looks more aggressive than intended and i don't like it