Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2020 9:18 am
do you like how she slotted you?In post 971, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:I like that Titus did post a list,
Titus was this in response to 962 or 967?
Genuine posting from Ice on a meta dive.
do you like how she slotted you?In post 971, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:I like that Titus did post a list,
Titus was this in response to 962 or 967?
Genuine posting from Ice on a meta dive.
Why?In post 969, Titus wrote:17. Starbuck - Lean scum
They're both my main. Kinda. I switch between em now. It's complicated yet also not.In post 974, Iecerint wrote:It makes sense in hindsight, but did not occur to me until it was pointed out to me. I had read the thread assuming you were not related to Elsa in any way.
I think you did allude to a non-alt account during the last Baker game (as Elsa, in the context of my asking if it was an alt account with a deliberately abrasive style), but I don't remember what you said that account was named, and I still can't remember specifically whether Bambi was that account, or if it was a third account.
It is accurate on the lack of action. Not the scum part though.In post 975, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:do you like how she slotted you?In post 971, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:I like that Titus did post a list,
Titus was this in response to 962 or 967?
Genuine posting from Ice on a meta dive.
What is the meaning of your inaction?In post 978, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:It is accurate on the lack of action. Not the scum part though.
I accept the Null read and will be first to admit my play so far is NAI. What I don't understand is the question! I am the 4th top poster of the game so far, so I am clearly present. No?In post 969, Titus wrote:12. Almost50 - Where is he? NAI for him. Null
I was confused by that assessment, too. There's plenty who that could be applied to and you weren't any of the names off the top of my head.In post 983, Almost50 wrote:I accept the Null read and will be first to admit my play so far is NAI. What I don't understand is the question! I am the 4th top poster of the game so far, so I am clearly present. No?In post 969, Titus wrote:12. Almost50 - Where is he? NAI for him. Null
This confused me too but it is the number of the playerlist in bakers original post.In post 985, Bambi Jay wrote:I'm just surprised I got to 7 without doing much.
Titus, what do you mean by chance to redeem?In post 969, Titus wrote:Galron - Weak town, worried by his Iec push.
2. Gamma Emerald - Town
3. DrippingGoofball - Town
4. PookyTheMagicalBear - Town
5. Titus - Fun Spreader
6. Lavender - Who? Scum by PoE
7. Bambi Jay - weak town
8. TiphaineDeath - weak scum
9. WaltertheDunce10 - scum by lack of action
10. BrightEyedFish - Town
11. NoPowerOverMe - Moderate town
12. Almost50 - Where is he? NAI for him. Null
13. pisskop Papa Zito - Null, giving a chance to redeem
14. Looker - Would lynch
15. Iecerint - Town
16. Doctor Drew - Town
17. Starbuck - Lean scum
18. a2rudeboy - Town
19. Princess Leia - Would lynch
20. I Keep Siteflaking - Survivalistic but likely floated as a viable mislynch bc no wagon on him
21. Nono - Let's see what chkflip does
In post 982, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:But this week my schedule cleared up a bit so that is good.
meh.In post 989, Galron wrote:In post 982, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:But this week my schedule cleared up a bit so that is good.
sounds cya
967 tbh.In post 971, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:I like that Titus did post a list,
Titus was this in response to 962 or 967?
Genuine posting from Ice on a meta dive.
Alright.In post 991, Titus wrote:967 tbh.In post 971, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:I like that Titus did post a list,
Titus was this in response to 962 or 967?
Genuine posting from Ice on a meta dive.
You don't remind me of the Weakest Link. That is meta which is garbage. Different style of game. Also garbage.
Volume =/= presence. A gibberish message can be blast on a loud speaker. It still has no presence in a debate.In post 983, Almost50 wrote:I accept the Null read and will be first to admit my play so far is NAI. What I don't understand is the question! I am the 4th top poster of the game so far, so I am clearly present. No?In post 969, Titus wrote:12. Almost50 - Where is he? NAI for him. Null
It's null by lack of activity which is quite fixable given Zito appears to have siteflaked.In post 987, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Titus, what do you mean by chance to redeem?
Oh rly?In post 988, davesaz wrote:Oh hey Titus dropped a weak scumtell.
Weakest Link isn't my only town game since I've been back and frankly, I'm not sure why my first game back on site (after like 3 or 4 years) is the one you're going to anyways if you're going to meta. I was getting back used to things, so of course, now that I've been back about 4 months, it's not going to be similar. That's just how it goes.In post 993, Titus wrote:You don't remind me of the Weakest Link. That is meta which is garbage. Different style of game. Also garbage.
Your pushes feel hollow. Less garbage.
This is why you're a weak scumread. Nothing strong but your posting feels empty.
Until you provided your reads list, the same could be said about you.In post 994, Titus wrote:Volume =/= presence. A gibberish message can be blast on a loud speaker. It still has no presence in a debate.In post 983, Almost50 wrote:I accept the Null read and will be first to admit my play so far is NAI. What I don't understand is the question! I am the 4th top poster of the game so far, so I am clearly present. No?In post 969, Titus wrote:12. Almost50 - Where is he? NAI for him. Null
Nothing you have said is memorable.