Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2020 4:31 am
I don’t really scumresd bell but i would be unsurprised if superbowl were partnered with him in the case that bell is scum
Those last two parts were jokes (or at least not actual points). You seem a little hasty to discredit me, friend.In post 937, Morning Mage wrote:i am not impressed by them. "shoot the top posters", my partner "needs to exit the game poste-haste", the world's population is majority female, aaand i spent a post saying hiGamma Emerald wrote:okay I'm gonna stop after page 26, that's 2/3s through the game
I think Morning Mage should be limmed for multiple reasons
anything I'm missing?
~Morning
Uh whatIn post 977, Menalque wrote:Gamma I’m finally gonna guillotine you like a year later, I’m excited
First time I've heard this, why?In post 971, Titus wrote:I think SB is the type of scum that will lead us to his partners if he's scum. Not sure he is though. He's a bad elim day 1.
If my ISO is empty yours would be a nuclear wastelandIn post 974, Menalque wrote:Superbowl just seemed very empty in ISO when I skimmed there
Our very first game together I spent the whole time tunnelling your slot and trying to misguillotine you and your non-misguillotinability was part of the reason why the scumteam lostIn post 978, Gamma Emerald wrote:Uh whatIn post 977, Menalque wrote:Gamma I’m finally gonna guillotine you like a year later, I’m excited
First time you've heard what exactly?In post 979, superbowl9 wrote:First time I've heard this, why?In post 971, Titus wrote:I think SB is the type of scum that will lead us to his partners if he's scum. Not sure he is though. He's a bad elim day 1.
honestly don't rememberIn post 972, Menalque wrote:This I’m curious about, what was it based on?In post 955, EchoVision wrote:i just had a slight scum read on your slot
In post 980, superbowl9 wrote:If my ISO is empty yours would be a nuclear wastelandIn post 974, Menalque wrote:Superbowl just seemed very empty in ISO when I skimmed there
Characterizing scum as likely to lead to partners, is that just a way of saying im poor scumIn post 982, Titus wrote:First time you've heard what exactly?In post 979, superbowl9 wrote:First time I've heard this, why?In post 971, Titus wrote:I think SB is the type of scum that will lead us to his partners if he's scum. Not sure he is though. He's a bad elim day 1.
...In post 981, Menalque wrote:Our very first game together I spent the whole time tunnelling your slot and trying to misguillotine you and your non-misguillotinability was part of the reason why the scumteam lostIn post 978, Gamma Emerald wrote:Uh whatIn post 977, Menalque wrote:Gamma I’m finally gonna guillotine you like a year later, I’m excited
And this time we’re gonna get to flip you on D1! The path to victory is assured
No. It's a way of saying you're talkative. Talkative scum always leave associations. It's impossible to avoid.In post 986, superbowl9 wrote:Characterizing scum as likely to lead to partners, is that just a way of saying im poor scumIn post 982, Titus wrote:First time you've heard what exactly?In post 979, superbowl9 wrote:First time I've heard this, why?In post 971, Titus wrote:I think SB is the type of scum that will lead us to his partners if he's scum. Not sure he is though. He's a bad elim day 1.
Wait, this isn’t the scum PT!In post 988, Gamma Emerald wrote:...In post 981, Menalque wrote:Our very first game together I spent the whole time tunnelling your slot and trying to misguillotine you and your non-misguillotinability was part of the reason why the scumteam lostIn post 978, Gamma Emerald wrote:Uh whatIn post 977, Menalque wrote:Gamma I’m finally gonna guillotine you like a year later, I’m excited
And this time we’re gonna get to flip you on D1! The path to victory is assured
VOTE: Menalque
Welcome to my townpool.In post 991, Ban Hydras wrote:Tempted to say we should unironically quicklaunch Gamma. Him ignoring my vote or Nero's declaration that he's scum while catching up is also scum-indicative.
Also, don't get scared by how quickly the wagon is growing. Scum are gonna want the sweet sweet buscred for this.
~Buttercup
no stop bad
Got it. Well we agree on that much at leastIn post 989, Titus wrote:No. It's a way of saying you're talkative. Talkative scum always leave associations. It's impossible to avoid.In post 986, superbowl9 wrote:Characterizing scum as likely to lead to partners, is that just a way of saying im poor scumIn post 982, Titus wrote:First time you've heard what exactly?In post 979, superbowl9 wrote:First time I've heard this, why?In post 971, Titus wrote:I think SB is the type of scum that will lead us to his partners if he's scum. Not sure he is though. He's a bad elim day 1.
I prefer eliminating scum with vapid ISOs or scummy lurkers d1.
BM doesn’t seem to be genuinely sorting and is resorting to shade, they jumped on me trying to discredit my push by mixing in obvious joke points, and just want one of the most active slots dead and theirs is both the least town and the least entertaining of the most active players.In post 992, Ban Hydras wrote:Gamma, what are the non-joke legitimate reasons you want Morning Mage dead?
~Buttercup