Mafiascum.net

In post 974, TheGoldenParadox wrote:obviously i can't prove this, but i think blitzo wrote this AFTER previewing and faked it so they didn't

Why though?

In post 974, TheGoldenParadox wrote:

In post 972, Blitzo wrote:My second thought was that TGP was entirely forgettable.
I might let that develop for a bit and see what happens.

obviously i can't prove this, but i think blitzo wrote this AFTER previewing and faked it so they didn't

what the fuck

In post 974, TheGoldenParadox wrote:obviously i can't prove this, but i think blitzo wrote this AFTER previewing and faked it

Probably not but this is a town thing to say I think

All of blitzos posting seems to be complaining about how much he has to read and how much it sucks

because they want to cast shade on a slot that is beginning to push them?
like, i genuinely do not understand the reasoning behind calling me "entirely forgettable" when 1) half the slots are entirely forgettable and 2) if i'm forgettable, how did you remember me enough to specifically single me out as forgettable

In post 962, Akarin wrote:DGB, why should I vote for Blitzo?

Vote for Blitzo if you don't want to vote for Battle Mage.

blitzo is like, straight scum

dgb, after page 39 do you think blitzo is a better elim

In post 977, MURDERCAT wrote:

In post 974, TheGoldenParadox wrote:obviously i can't prove this, but i think blitzo wrote this AFTER previewing and faked it

Probably not but this is a town thing to say I think

battle mage is like, fairly town to me and i'm not inclined to eliminate there

You're not wrong.
I also think that now is the time to rectify that.
I've given a number of my reads.
What are yours?
PEDIT - #973 is simply not a good post.
Double PEDIT - I don't see how that's true cakez.
I think I've given a number of reads and ideas and don't see how that's not the case?
Where are you at in opinions rn?

i think my philosophy today is "lim scum or not at all"
so it goes limming scum > no elim > limming town, as opposed to limming scum > limming town > no elim like most games

In post 982, TheGoldenParadox wrote:dgb, after page 39 do you think blitzo is a better elim

Maybe but still I want more than one horse in the race.

Blitzo, what caused you to add this in as a pedit?

In post 984, Blitzo wrote:PEDIT - #973 is simply not a good post.

Blitzo and Taly need to vote.

In post 984, Blitzo wrote:You're not wrong.
I also think that now is the time to rectify that.
I've given a number of my reads.
What are yours?
PEDIT - #973 is simply not a good post.
Double PEDIT - I don't see how that's true cakez.
I think I've given a number of reads and ideas and don't see how that's not the case?
Where are you at in opinions rn?

Ok it was hyperbole but I still feel a significant portion of your posting is that

@akarin - the fact that 973 was not a good post and he made it while I was posting.
It feels incredibly nitpicky and almost like he pulled that idea out of thin air.
I legitimately don't know what else I can really say about it other than how angry it made me.
Is it scum? Possibly.
@DGB - You're not wrong on that front but I'd still like you to talk to me about stuff.
What haven't I addressed or what's changed or what's up I suppose?
I'd also like to parse my wagon first since it's so bad that I think scum has to be on it.
PEDIT - cakez I'd like you to sit down and point out how "complaining" or whatever it is you've called it has outweighed my reads and other contributions.

Blitzo, can you check if you're mis-numbering? Because that would clear something up

Also, TGP is a they

Blitzo, you say a few times that no-elim is obviously bad, like to the point you want to vote for people suggesting it.

Why?

The idea behind it is that we get tasks done faster if we have more players working on them and D1 eliminations are usually on town anyway.

After 1 Day, 1/3-1/2 of the tasks are gonna be done so each miseliminated townie only adds 1 task unless they were one of the minority who didn't do one as part of keeping someone else safe.

What part of that is obviously bad to you?

You are correct that I am misnumbering - it was 974, not 973.
I also think I answered this question already earlier?
It was mostly a game balance thing and the fact that we're already massclaiming all the stuff that makes it possible for us to win that way just makes it way easier for scum to pack us in that way.
Though I didn't really think of the numbers behind it.
What exactly is our plan though?
Do nothing and win?
That seems...Terrible, for a number of reasons.

In post 990, Blitzo wrote:@DGB - You're not wrong on that front but I'd still like you to talk to me about stuff.

Sure, park your vote somewhere.

i mean when i play among us, i dont elim someone randomly right off the bat, usually we find a dead body first and start finger pointing about who was with him?

In post 994, Blitzo wrote:I also think I answered this question already earlier?
It was mostly a game balance thing and the fact that we're already massclaiming all the stuff that makes it possible for us to win that way just makes it way easier for scum to pack us in that way.
Though I didn't really think of the numbers behind it.
What exactly is our plan though?
Do nothing and win?
That seems...Terrible, for a number of reasons.

I think you're just objectively wrong here, as I've tried to lay out in the last dozen or so posts.

Care to explain your reasoning a bit more? Why is it terrible for a number of reasons? Why do you think the plan is to do nothing? Why do you think the game would be designed with tasks being unachievable, why put them in then?

Why do you think it's terrible to try to limit scum bonus kills and gain an advantage for town?

@dgb - Sure.
VOTE: battle mage
Now.
What's the deal?

In post 561, OutWorldER wrote:

In post 544, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also reminding people Reck scumslipped in a post

Which post was the scumslip? Are you talking about 121?

no it was a longer one
he said "we nk" in a way that looks like he wrote up the post in the scum PT and left that in accidentally.