Catching up on today's excitement. A wild Not_Mafia appears. I'm just going to not think about it too hard and hold to the cheeky line. See no reason to change the read there, and see no way to read Not_Mafia.
In post 903, Andresvmb wrote:A lot of quiet’s early posts seem non-committal and don’t really say much. I’m rather intrigued by the slot. Like they’re claiming to be somewhat of a newbie so give them some room, but the posts actually seem well thought out. Except for the fact that... there’s barely any fire to them.
I’ll give an example. 598 is analyzing a post by Luca that well, was harshly criticizing Mini for not really contributing anything useful. But quiet is interpreting it as a legitimate argument. It’s a strange take. And this question about whether Scum ever produce filler content? Of course they do! Everybody does. It’s not AI actually unless you start seeing a lot of filler as a means of distraction.
This is prob the best take i've seen on my posting. I'll review 598/try to clarify what I meant by the filler content thing if ya want, but it probably isn't all that useful.
I like your take because it kind of highlights what I see as the biggest issue with my play right now. I can be well thought out, that is something within my ability to control. If I take my time while posting, I can do that. But being useful, directed, "fiery", having a point, some kind of purposiveness... that is a lot harder. I'm trying to keep the scope of my attention today mostly to visible wagons (mini, cheeky, plus, etc), people that stand out for some reason (the aggressive Bypasser, high-frequency-king Norwegian), or reactions/responses to me as it helps keep it manageable.
I thought Andres put a similar amount of attention and interest into the rest of their catch up posts, and generally liked the slot before today, so they're town to me. I thought the interactions between Mom and Dad I mean Andres have been interesting. I was kinda hoping someone else would chime in. I have a decent townlean on Mom, too.
I thought I said "Dad I mean Andre" as a joke, but maybe I messed it up or something. In that post dad=andre.
Also andre didn't know what to think of me and wanted me to have more fire and honestly I think that qualifies him for the position as dad.
I'm townlean on Mom because she strikes me as independently solving. Also, Mom seems generally protective, which I find interesting.
In post 936, Momrangal wrote:That's a really weird way to get me to back down on my interrogation on your pursuit of mini. I feel like they are being unfairly treated, and they are being railed on.
In post 955, Momrangal wrote:The points against NM is fair though, and I'm aware of cheekys preferences and NMs disposition to games but I would hate to [elim] on policy, which is what it does kinda feel like to me
In post 744, Momrangal wrote:Lurksack nero is definitely a worry but I feel like there may be other reasons he's not wholly here I outside of alignment
Spoiler:
A slightly...imperfect example, that felt related but not exactly the same because they were backing down on their own read of DGB vs. defending someone else's
In post 656, Momrangal wrote:I think theyre town. They are playing boldly, and wildly and like they aren't really thinking things through. They were far cagier in yellowstone
Actually this whole post/interaction is interesting and I wonder if anyone else has any takes on it.
Momangral, do you feel like lurkey people get miselimed? Seems to be the common denominator between the first three. You are also sus of Gamma and Norwigian and a few others I don't really see pinged by anyone else (or at least not very many people). Do you like the plusJoyad wagon more than the cheeky wagon?
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 3:53 pm
by quiet
also I like the protective mother angle please don't stop thanks okay back to being thoughtful
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 3:56 pm
by Gamma Emerald
Thinking about it mom’s choice of targets is rather problematic, she’s going after high-activity slots (me and Nor), which kinda seems counter-intuitive.
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 3:58 pm
by quiet
In post 986, Gamma Emerald wrote:she’s going after high-activity slots (me and Nor), which kinda seems counter-intuitive
and defending low-activity slots. It's like the inverse of everyone else.
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 4:15 pm
by quiet
In post 271, Luca Blight wrote:I can relate to that post tbh as there are certain players I find completely unreadable, who I hope to be resolved by PR's.
Hey this is from a long time ago, but which players do you find completely unreadable?
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 4:24 pm
by quiet
In post 807, DrippingGoofball wrote:I get fakeclaiming dayvig, daycop, PGO, odd-night ninja serial killer mason... but miller? It sounds like an impulsive scum move that was recanted after someone suddenly recalled that rolecops are a thing.
Seems just like BB to me.
Other than disagreeing on that read, I've liked everything DGB has posted since just before I voted them. Liked their posts today a lot. Town to me.
I thought I liked Rainycat. I'm going to go see if I can articulate why.
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 4:54 pm
by chkflip
VOTE: Not_Mafia
Fuck that noise.
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 4:58 pm
by Gamma Emerald
What exactly changed your mind about that slot? Is there any meta element to that change, either connected to NM or not?
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 5:08 pm
by Rannygazoo
Quiet, your posts are so hard to read. My eyes just roll off them like water on wax.
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 5:14 pm
by chkflip
I'm ftr good with 40p D1. We have information.
Oh hi btw don't openly discuss night actions or even the possibility of having them. Stop doing mafias job for them. Thaaaaaanks
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 5:19 pm
by chkflip
In post 992, Gamma Emerald wrote:What exactly changed your mind about that slot? Is there any meta element to that change, either connected to NM or not?
I didn't care for your case on precious players in the slot, but this one is just being obnoxious. I'm good on that.
