Mafiascum.net

you said you were ~not sure how you felt about my convo with skitt~, and when i asked why, you just ignored me?

Wait, I did? I don’t remember you asking at all

-QB

In post 834, Datisi wrote:

In post 808, Bridgeburners wrote:Also, to preempt what I think is a likely question: I’m not sure how I feel about your engagement with skitt so far.

i'm surprised you didn't preempt a different likely question: why?

you don't even read my posts, i'm heartbroken.

I missed one post! And just, like... I just don’t have strong feelings on it? It didn’t feel super AI for you?

-QB

i was under the impression that "not sure how i feel about it" there implied that you actively disliked it but eh

in any case, do you see why i find it weird that you're saying how you wish there were more interactions between me and you/your slot but you're like... not really trying to interact with me at all?

Nah, like I’m unsure what I think of it

And I think you’re mixing up our heads?

Skitt wanted to vote you to get you to engage with us more — I supported the vote because I wasn’t really townreading you by that point and I sort of thought I would be. But I never was happy to just kind of continue to observe you and what you were doing, while skitt wanted you to have interactions with us *specifically*

-QB

I don't like the ben wagon, I'll compromise on AFF

UNVOTE:
VOTE: aaron

Interesting, why?

-QB

In post 808, Bridgeburners wrote:So the thing of trying to get you to engage with our slot more via vote seemed like a good idea?

i thought you were more enthusiastic about getting me to engage w you, but upon looking skimming through your iso for 1.5 minutes, this is the only thing i was able to find from you specifically, so eh

did you accidentally write that "never" in 981?

am i still just a confused null to you? is there anything that i can do to help you sort me?

infinity, do you townread ben?

In post 973, Datisi wrote:

In post 844, Datisi wrote:do you have any updated thoughts on burners of bridges

@seCrEt

not the seCret head, but we chatted and we both have small gutpings on the annahilator of bridges, he didn't say on *what* though

tbf would be cool if ben went in the thread so that we could actually move fowards

- hYdra

crap got caught up in a mess of other stuff in my life here i am
let me just read a bit

beetlejuice moment

bottom rawr !

In post 985, Datisi wrote:infinity, do you townread ben?

Yes

In post 938, Isis wrote:

In post 933, AaronFrost wrote:VOTE: ben dover i think this is e-2

i think this game is in need of a claim or a flip and doing something is better than doing nothing

I like implo's analysis enough to go with this and get a claim.

intent to NMhammer ben dover

I'm a plain tracker. Work with that while I'm still trying to sort my thoughts.

also fuck this game didn't go well. I tried not to be the N1 kill but that failed pretty horribly in retrospect. should have just tried to play my regular towngame.

damnit

UNVOTE:

think this gets easily disproven if fake

- hYdra

In post 984, Datisi wrote:

In post 808, Bridgeburners wrote:So the thing of trying to get you to engage with our slot more via vote seemed like a good idea?

i thought you were more enthusiastic about getting me to engage w you, but upon looking skimming through your iso for 1.5 minutes, this is the only thing i was able to find from you specifically, so eh

did you accidentally write that "never" in 981?

am i still just a confused null to you? is there anything that i can do to help you sort me?

nah sorry, I haven't wanted to force it and I just think we haven't overlapped that much or had that much to say

also, tbh, sorting you can be kind of a headache so I was hoping you would just ~be town~ and then I could engage with you after I was already happy with the read

I did accidentally write that and had to reread the post at least 3 times to actually find it as my brain kept skipping over it

and you're like -- you're not exactly null in the sense of I don't think you've done AI things, you're like a conflicted slot, would be better? like I could see your play coming from town but also from scum? if AFF or ben is scum, I would say probably less likely to be scum, but if they're both town then I think you look a lot worse

-QB

let's flip ben anyway

-QB

In post 939, seCret hYdra wrote:i know my reasons for voting ben dover but this got to NM-1 awfully quickly on a rather weak case even if i say so myself

I mean honestly, there hasn't really been a strong case on anyone so I'd rather get a claim or a flip or something instead of just sitting around waiting for things to happen

keep up AFF, we already have a claim

-QB