you have a "null" read which isn't even a read.
fence sitting on a backup claim is so easy to do. Is he scum for claiming backup "I dont know" choose a side or shut up.
In post 841, Frozen Angel wrote:He literally threw the account under suspicious by first saying "Scum more likely claim like this"
Its not like I was town reading the guy and then I suddenly starting pushing him when he claimed pr. Its not different than you saying that backup would be easy to fakeclaim as scum while continuing to fencesit on him.
In post 841, Frozen Angel wrote:then gave himself an out by saying "but town does it too, lets eliminate it in future days"
I highly doubt that town you ever stops and thinks twice about voting a claimed PR. This is how I know you are scum here. Also, you won't even commit to a stance on him.
ofc you have that really bad fake lie that a backup isn't a pr.
In post 849, Frozen Angel wrote:He would not ever react like that to both eye theory and hockey claim the way he did if he was town and he would not act like he scum reads me the way he is doing it right now
you don't know me. You can't tell me what I will and won't do. This is fake.
ISO me
In post 878, Greeting wrote:Really? I haven't seen scum fakeclaiming a PR early game like... ever. In fact, I'd say I haven't seen a lot of scum fakeclaiming PRs at all.
This is a pretty well known fact and maybe its more apparent to me b/c I've been here a played more than you have. Do you really think I'm lying about this? I guess you should get a little leeway since you've only been here half a year and you've only played in a few newbies and opens but I'm not the biggest fan of you defending Angel by saying that you haven't seen this.
In post 878, Greeting wrote:Please clarify if you think HockeyFan is fakeclaiming and if so then where does this leave you voting Frozen Angel instead.
That's the point. I don't know if he's fakeclaiming or not. Angel doesn't know if he's fakeclaiming or not and refuses to take a stance on him.
Angel is just scum regardless of his alignment.
In post 888, Frozen Angel wrote:He never ever ever expressed any sort of read on my slot beside his vote, which was a direct reaction to me calling him out on it.
actually...in
531 I said scum in likely to be in HockeyFan, Eyes without a face , Greeting, Scorpious, 0verki11, Frozen Angel
and then when AD was asking who to vote I said
I mean, they are close enough. I said that if he was scum he'd likely claim pr but that we should think about not voting out a claimed pr which is like decent-good town play. I mean what you said, that backup is ez to claim as scum, and berating him for claiming isn't fundamentally any different than what I said, It's just using alot more words and you are claiming that it's analysis which it really isn't. You are visibly upset that he potentially claimed his way out of elimination today and I could easily see scum you mad that he's no longer today's limbait.
I mean, I took a stance on Hockey and you didn't so who is really the one avoiding?
I wouldn't go that far but agree that Scorps vote is dumb. He just repped in and hasn't finished catching up though I would like him to talk about how he was agreeing with me on Hockey and then agreeing with YOU about my Hockey reads and that just seems...idk contradictory.
obviously, you like him b/c he's agreeing with you.
but Scorp voting there when we should be consolidating on hockey, angel or eyes is pretty dumb.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
edited c.s. lewis quote b/c limit
