Page 40 of 329
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 5:57 am
by MalcolmTucker
In post 971, tenebrousluminary wrote:
Really? All I asked was for you to address questions I had asked you, and that is defensive?
I will look for the post.
You're implying I chose to ignore questions you asked me that, from looking back from your ISO, I can't find. Clearly I am not ignoring them, what basis would I have for doing that at such an early stage in the game? Your post felt unnecessarily defensive based on a brief read from me that you might be mafia...the very same reasoning you used to justify your suspicions of Datisi early on.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 5:59 am
by fireisredsir
In post 964, Nordom wrote:Malcom, I think you're getting too over-excited in the pants from Datisi's lazy town read on you. You gotta dig deeper.
this is p funny coming from someone with the laziest townread/pocket attempt of the game with
881
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 5:59 am
by MalcolmTucker
In post 972, fireisredsir wrote: In post 950, MalcolmTucker wrote:Reading through Nordom's style, I dunno if this is how they usually play it, but it also feels like there's a weird mix of some absolute statements and suspicions mixed with a lot of tentative questions directed at other players like their conviction stance on Datisi. A bit like they're content to be forceful and pushy with some players but not with others.
i saw this too, when they did the cocky "mmhmmm" thing with skitter after a terrible argument they were super quick afterwards to be like "but don't worry i townread skitter" bc skitter is apparently kinda scary
Yeah, like at some points there are sequences of posts with lots of tentative questions which could be read as helpful townie not wanting to jump to conclusions...but then they'll go out right afterwards and say Deas is definitely mafia because of a vague theory concocted up out of nowhere that doesn't particularly make sense. At least someone like Yeet has been more conclusive when they've gone in with absolute theories and reads early on.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:00 am
by Nordom
Actually, the thing is with DeasVail, is that I'm not certain that mafia would make such a concentrated and concise effort on me. Let's assume they're mafia and successfully got me lynched. Where do they go from there? Maybe some kind of confidence that they could spin it around, but...
Unless they thought I was an easy target that could be spit-roasted at the snap of the fingers. I just can't say.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:00 am
by tenebrousluminary
In post 962, MalcolmTucker wrote: In post 268, tenebrousluminary wrote:It seems like you are simultaneously demanding that I be defensive and demanding that I go on an offensive in order to satisfy you.
Convincing you is not at the top of my priority list right now anyway, thank you. I am planning to engage with more people and trying to hunt, but you are the one who said I was being dismissive. Suspecting me for responding to it seems at odds with your point that I am suspicious for not responding to the suspicions of others.
Posts like this are kinda why I find you dodgy @tenebros. Like it's an absolutely nothing post in terms of rebuking suspicion against you while also trying to invert the entire discussion against the person who's potentially accused you of being mafia in the first place. It's deflection.
It's also odd that early in the game you accused Datisi of being overly sensitive and defensive about the initial push for them, and yet once heat was directed your way, you kinda moved between a similarly defensive stance and sometimes brushing off the heat with throwaway jokes about how exciting it was. There's an inconsistency there, like you don't want to appear too worried about any heat while also being aware you have to mount some sort of response to clear your name.
I think this is one of my more clearly townie posts, so I don't think we will see eye to eye about it.
I responded to fua because they struck a nerve, but I maintain that I am not required to respond to every accusation lobbed my way and I still find it ridiculous that fua has applied that standard only to me and no one else.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:01 am
by Nordom
Datisi's omgus is just garbage though. No question about it.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:02 am
by tenebrousluminary
In post 964, Nordom wrote:Malcom, I think you're getting too over-excited in the pants from Datisi's lazy town read on you. You gotta dig deeper.
These posts are not appropriate. Please stop.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:03 am
by fireisredsir
ok other people have been louder and more distracting but let's not forget about tene. why are you so concerned with evaluating how towny your own posts are?
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:04 am
by Nordom
In post 976, fireisredsir wrote: In post 964, Nordom wrote:Malcom, I think you're getting too over-excited in the pants from Datisi's lazy town read on you. You gotta dig deeper.
this is p funny coming from someone with the laziest townread/pocket attempt of the game with
881
Oh, gee wiz. I guess town should never flaunt their huge balls on display and say what they're thinking, regardless of any resistance they may meet.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:04 am
by Datisi
In post 980, Nordom wrote:Datisi's omgus is just garbage though. No question about it.
the link to where you "explained" the "datisi is pushing the popular wu/monkey" wagons is coming when...? the explanation why you're claiming you most strongly scumread deas but are apparently dead set on arguing with everything i say when...?
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:05 am
by tenebrousluminary
In post 974, Nordom wrote:There's so many people I want gone today. Datisi/DeasVail/fireisredsir/maybe VP Baltar
Is it just me, or has your Datisi read suddenly switched three or more times in the last 3 pages?
I am seeing nuanced and complex thought processes from Datisi right now. I remain unsure about him, but in light of that and my plethora of other suspects, I would like to give him some space.
I am still considering whether Nordom is scum or merely unusual.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:06 am
by Nordom
In post 981, tenebrousluminary wrote: In post 964, Nordom wrote:Malcom, I think you're getting too over-excited in the pants from Datisi's lazy town read on you. You gotta dig deeper.
These posts are not appropriate. Please stop.
If those particular sentences managed to offend anybody, then I think that person needs to grow a thicker skin.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:06 am
by tenebrousluminary
In post 975, MalcolmTucker wrote: In post 971, tenebrousluminary wrote:
Really? All I asked was for you to address questions I had asked you, and that is defensive?
I will look for the post.
You're implying I chose to ignore questions you asked me that, from looking back from your ISO, I can't find. Clearly I am not ignoring them, what basis would I have for doing that at such an early stage in the game? Your post felt unnecessarily defensive based on a brief read from me that you might be mafia...the very same reasoning you used to justify your suspicions of Datisi early on.
You are quite determined to think the worst of me. It is not unusual to think that players who do not answer an address are intentionally avoiding doing so.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:07 am
by Nordom
In post 984, Datisi wrote: In post 980, Nordom wrote:Datisi's omgus is just garbage though. No question about it.
the link to where you "explained" the "datisi is pushing the popular wu/monkey" wagons is coming when...? the explanation why you're claiming you most strongly scumread deas but are apparently dead set on arguing with everything i say when...?
I've already established my reasoning a few pages back. Wu was the pressure push and Monkey was just the idle comment because he was a popular choice at the time.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:07 am
by tenebrousluminary
In post 986, Nordom wrote: In post 981, tenebrousluminary wrote: In post 964, Nordom wrote:Malcom, I think you're getting too over-excited in the pants from Datisi's lazy town read on you. You gotta dig deeper.
These posts are not appropriate. Please stop.
If those particular sentences managed to offend anybody, then I think that person needs to grow a thicker skin.
I am not offended, but minors use this forum. There was nothing sexual going on here until you decided to use a graphic metaphor. It is not called for.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:08 am
by Datisi
that does not change my view
In post 810, skitter30 wrote: In post 469, Datisi wrote:i understand the irony of yelling "i'm not upset!!" at being accused of being upset but like
this is not how i look like when i am upset >_>
How do you look like when you're being upset?
remember newbie 1992? that
In post 986, Nordom wrote:If those particular sentences managed to offend anybody, then I think that person needs to grow a thicker skin.
not a game related comment: i do find those comments quite disgusting and uncomfortable and you should refrain from commenting things like that in the future.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:08 am
by fua
In post 986, Nordom wrote: In post 981, tenebrousluminary wrote: In post 964, Nordom wrote:Malcom, I think you're getting too over-excited in the pants from Datisi's lazy town read on you. You gotta dig deeper.
These posts are not appropriate. Please stop.
If those particular sentences managed to offend anybody, then I think that person needs to grow a thicker skin.
I think you should consider what’s appropriate or not appropriate when it comes to a game of mafia. Stop talking about someone else’s genitals or their sexual habits, and stop saying the L word. That’s the only time I’ll ask.
Thank you.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:09 am
by Nordom
In post 731, Nordom wrote: In post 729, VP Baltar wrote:Datisi pressured monkey? I honestly felt like he didn't take a strong position on that exchange.
I could be missing something because I was getting somewhat Corso eyed toward the end of my catchup
Well, he didn't take a hard-stance in outright calling him scum, but he certainly felt the need to give little "snacks for thought" regarding monkey without committing himself fully.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:09 am
by tenebrousluminary
In post 982, fireisredsir wrote:
ok other people have been louder and more distracting but let's not forget about tene. why are you so concerned with evaluating how towny your own posts are?
I am not "so concerned." I made a single comment indicating that Mr. Tucker and I clearly approach the game differently.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:10 am
by fua
In post 985, tenebrousluminary wrote: In post 974, Nordom wrote:There's so many people I want gone today. Datisi/DeasVail/fireisredsir/maybe VP Baltar
Is it just me, or has your Datisi read suddenly switched three or more times in the last 3 pages?
I am seeing nuanced and complex thought processes from Datisi right now. I remain unsure about him, but in light of that and my plethora of other suspects, I would like to give him some space.
I am still considering whether Nordom is scum or merely unusual.
This is the first post from Tenebro I’ve actually really liked. I think he’s sitting comfortably in null right now.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:11 am
by Datisi
In post 988, Nordom wrote:Wu was the pressure push and Monkey was just the idle comment because he was a popular choice at the time.
i made one (1) post on wu, AFTER being asked my opinion. and i did not call monkey scum, quite the opposite, i said i don't think those weird posts make him scum. all while pushing skitter and tenebro, who i was first on.
can you acknowledge the above, and then tell me whether you still think i was making "lazy convenient reads on wu and monkey"?
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:12 am
by Nordom
No, I won't acknowledge it. Now, give me your read on DeasVail, Datisi.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:12 am
by Nordom
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:13 am
by Datisi
i'm done talking to you.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:13 am
by Datisi
what do you like about it?
