Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 4:59 am
Overall i agree, it's case per case, but example is not best one.
You say this but it doesn’t change that youIn post 973, Enchant wrote:But i got criticized as town.In post 964, Gamma Emerald wrote:I believe I disliked how his FT push didn’t feel like a real thought process
But atp that’s not really relevant to how I want to approach that slot
UNVOTE:Felt like there was semi-substantial pressure on FT from Norwee and froggoIn post 933, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Can you explain how Enchant's vote was opportunistic?In post 729, Gamma Emerald wrote:Feels like an opportunistic and grimy vote choice
The vote thus felt like trying to predict wagon dynamics and tack on an extra vote
Enchant recently got criticized for a quickhammer so I kinda think scum!Enchant might rubberband into trying to vote very early on what he thinks is a viable lim wagon
As mafia i can as well kingdom come everything on sight, and there's virtually nothing stopping me.
What are your current thoughts on me?In post 925, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I felt like our 1v1 was making the game intolerable so i backed off to give it more thought.In post 924, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Has your read on Gamma changed?
Well yes.In post 976, Gamma Emerald wrote: You say this but it doesn’t change that youcould havedone what I’m proposing.
There was mech spec outside of this, I'm not talking about your claim at all really?In post 974, Enchant wrote:1. You was cult in that game.In post 956, Bellaphant wrote:Not all mech spec is scummy. Enchant wasn't scummy in deptuy cultists. Just mech spec is scummy, yes.
2. I claimed not CCed PR, and conftowned due of that, nothing to do with "scummy not scummy".
You’re either obtuse or scum. Should I make 50,000 more posts saying this, because I would absolutely enjoy doing that.In post 949, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I'm being obtuse? That's fucking rich. Are you not reading my posts?
I'll state it again, just to be clear.
YOUR SLOT GAVE ALIANNA NO WAY OUT. That is scummy.
I AM NOT BLAMING THE ENTIRE ELIM ON YOU. I AM SAYING THAT YOUR PUSH/VOTE WAS BAD AND IT LOOKS SCUMMY.
You have not, and continue not to, refute my point regarding your slot giving Alianna no way out because you know it is true and this is the main cause for my read.
Instead, you chose to try and conflate two issues so that you could call my hypocritical when in fact I am not being hypocritical whatsoever. Now you've resorted to calling me obtuse because, again, you simply have no answer to my reasoning for why I scum read you.
VOTE: Fun Times
Someone on that wagon NOT lacking self-awareness.In post 950, Bellaphant wrote:I'll go back later and quote but enchant claims n5 doc or something really early and somnus just asks sensible questions.In post 945, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Bella, you town read Somnus before 330 so can you go back a little further please?
What do you like about how they approached Enchant? Can you quote post it?
What response regarding low hanging fruit? Again, can you quote it please?
Pedit - What do you think about Norwegian's 484 ?
Pedit again - I don't particularly like that answer Bella. I feel like you're hedging your reads this game and scum reading Norwegian is a very safe take for you to have right now.
@Fun Times - It's not a silly question to ask because you use meta as a defence for everything. So it's like 'forget what you think because x, y and z think we're town because meta so you should too!' which I don't really buy.
Pedit again - How is it hypocritical?
Much later, probably after my read, but still very much about my read going into n1, which is what I was talking about, he says that nm and enchant are both lhf (I think in response to someone else saying it, maybe me???) But he doesn't want to elim either right now. It felt very organic.
I'll check that norwee posts in a bit, but you accused me of 'hedging my reads' day one and I wasn't, in fact I asked for yours in response to me being explicit and you basically responsed by calling me 'sassy' instead. So, some reads?
Plus, my norwee read was fairly early and I actually started the Alinaa wagon, (my vote was formatted wrong and didn't count but I'm p sure I was first, if not second), so I really don't know where this accusation has come from? Especially not twice.
You’re either obtuse or scum.In post 981, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I see you still can't refute my reasoning.
Stop acting like it doesn't exist.
FIFY
His question essentially amounts to spam since Andante already responded to it like a gazillion times already and I see no point in restating the obvious. BBT is either not reading of fake solving. Which one here, is anyone’s guess.In post 989, Gamma Emerald wrote:@BBT I feel like you’re playstyle clashing with Nancy here
It’s against her nature to ever admit she’s been scummy, so expecting her to acknowledge your point is a lost cause
I think she did but I’ll pass along your message.In post 991, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Andante didn't answer it. Andante gave a narrative of what happened in thread - I know what happened in thread because I read it.
Andante did not address the main concern of giving Ali no wiggle room in terms of scum if she doesn't post and scum if she does.
If they did address this, please explicitly quote that explantion for me.
He feels somewhat towny rnIn post 992, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Gamma, what do you think about Penguin?
Oh I thought you were calling us scum but now we’re just dense. Wow, colour me NOT impressed.In post 994, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I've already addressed the hypocrite comment and how that absolutely doesn't apply but you're clearly too dense to see that.
I mentioned the Ali thing because you keep saying I'm hesitant or hedgey with my reads - starting a wagon isn't that.In post 959, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I wasn't really speaking to you regarding the Ali wagon, I was more interested in your town read of Somnus. You claimed a town read on him in 330 and I was asking you to show me where this read formed. Those 3 posts you quoted could easily come from either alignment a sit involved a lot of mech spec so I'm still unsure how you formed that town read unless there are other posts before 330?
I don't understand the reference to town!Norwegian finding a scum slip? Or the reference to Fun Times either.
I responded to this, which is what you said. You then asked me why I was talking about town!norwee and claiming a scum slip????In post 952, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I feel like that is Town!Norwegian trying to claim early credit for a scum!Ali flip.
Given Ali flipped town, then 484 seems unlikely to come from scum.
Will get to your longer post when I can