Mafiascum.net

In post 9702, zoraster wrote:

In post 9695, Cephrir wrote:

In post 9678, zoraster wrote:

In post 9676, Cephrir wrote:

In post 9673, zoraster wrote:But for the second, yes, I think it casts doubt on Korina not killing night 2.

If the first person to submit gets their kill flavor on it, doesnt it stand to reason that person also will have carried out the kill for the purposes of Amrun's role?

I would assume so? But I don't think there was an argument here that there were two kills on Vork or FF, right?

Then I guess I dont understand what you're saying!

There were two parts to this and they're separate.

One is the situation around Elements and the "whoever submitted first" thing could be relevant (though as I've said, unlikely) in terms of the claimed Creature Kill that turned up SK-ish flavor language that matched up with Menalque's death when Elements said he DIDN'T shoot. Because theoretically it's possible that both SK and Vigilante-Elements shot Creature but SK submitted first so the flavor was SK-ish. Again, I do not believe this to be the case, but it is possible.

The other separate point is the Amrun result, which has Korina on N2 along with (for sake of simplicity) me and Wooper. Korina gave a brownie to someone (I forget who at the moment) who confirmed it happened. So because people assumed a kill and an action COULDN'T happen on the same night, that meant either me or Wooper was the person who killed FF. But as it turns out, the mod DOES allow both an action and a kill from the same player, so Korina, confirmed scum through his death, is possibly if not likely the N2 killer too.

Does that make sense? My questions were about two different aspects of the game.

In post 9651, Rautherdir wrote:pisskop,

In post 8722, pisskop wrote:

In post 8718, Miss Lane wrote:

In post 8716, gobbledygook wrote:Oh my god that was a terrible stretch of posts by Iconeum. I’ve read maybe 25% of this game so thank you for bringing that to my attention. You’re like the towniest 3P ever.

yep, that's me! you're friendly neighborhood 3p

so can you say the following words in order:




I am not ascension or runelord aligned and my wincon is compatible with the cobblers.

In post 9746, Cephrir wrote:He said he could confirm his role. I dont think he said he could confirm his alignment.

In post 9741, Pink Ball wrote:What if FL, BBMolla and gobble are ALL scum?

In post 9756, Flavor Leaf wrote:Actually, Gobble and I just won a scum game together.

In post 9749, cyrus62 wrote:VOTE: iconhe seems to be acting weird this game

In post 9757, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 9756, Flavor Leaf wrote:Actually, Gobble and I just won a scum game together.

You mean the game where we killed him and he was the traitor?

In post 9760, AaronFrost wrote:I better not ever roll traitor with you as scum.

In post 9762, Miss Lane wrote:i will 100% support sitebans for moderators who include traitors in their games

In post 9769, Miss Lane wrote:i rolled the traitor role earlier this year - with the addition that if my scum partners died, i lost.

i had absolutely no effect that game. town lynched both my buddies and there was nothing i could od about it

iirc they didn't even know they had a treacherous partner

In post 9768, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 9762, Miss Lane wrote:i will 100% support sitebans for moderators who include traitors in their games

I don’t mind traitors, i just don’t like unrecruitable traitors.

I also like playing with different ways of getting traitors to join up with their squad.

Like in Last Night Tomorrow, Profii couldn’t be kill, and if he was shot, a global loud message was posted anonymously, but when Profii used all his shots up for his role, he was able to join in with the Mafia.