Yeah you'll be lucky if half the players don't quit...ac1983fan wrote:We're getting some good replacements now, and I like that.
Lemme break this game wide open.
ac1983fan replaces Panzerjager, who replaced Megatheory, who replaced NumberfourteenDrippingGoofball wrote:The voting record isn't especially useful.
But I'll bet there's one scum in this lot:
Megatheory, Alabaska J, yawetag, pacman281292
I've seen Jebus act that way before and he was town. Twice.The Fonz wrote:I can. Jebus and Braeden are my top picks.
Have you bothered with my post 540?ac1983fan wrote:She's accusing you of a case that is supposedly ALL bad vibes. there is a difference between "partly" and "all".Alabaska J wrote: and if you are accusing me of basing a case partly off of bad vibes, then you should also be looking at ac1983fan, because that's half of his case on me
I did answer. You're not reading.Alabaska J wrote:Also, can you please answer the questions i asked of you? if you read me in isolation, you HAD to have seen them, so i'm curious as to why you didn't answer them in your post.
DGB, please explain Jebus and Fonz for me, as well as telling me what the asterisks mean.
I already did, I found The Fonz's predecessor to be by far the scummiest player in the game. The Fonz is a good player, and I didn't feel I was going to get traction on a wagon since people were already defending him, and ignoring his predecessor's scummy record.Zilla wrote:^ Explanation please, especially given that the original reason needs clarification itself.
I didn't suspect him for lurking, but for the content that he posted. Connection issues are not relevant here.The Fonz wrote:Except that I don't see how you can argue Pacman was particularly scummy. He claimed repeatedly to have serious connection issues[...].
It may not be a slamdunk case, but I think he honestly believes it, so that makes him townie in my book.Zilla wrote:Your case on Jebus is shoddy. You've got two reasons, it seems. Reason 1 is OMGUS. Reason 2 is his inconsistency between me and yawetag.
I agree on reason 2. Now, I'd like you to tell me why you think it's scummy.
I'm more in favor of original material than quoting.
I don't know what the convention is in this situation. All I know is the result that I got.ac1983fan wrote:This seems odd, if he had targetted AJ n2, wouldn't he have gotten an inno and not wanted to lynch AJ? also, even with a bus driver, wouldn't you track the cop to the person they actually visited?
There's also a dead mafia bus driver, so the scum might be similarly loaded.CrashTextDummie wrote:Sorry for the triple post:Don't forget the passive one-shot NK immune townie. That's six pretty good power roles. I especially want Zilla's opinion on this.Fonz wrote:Also, I'd like people's opinions on the possibility that the game has all of the following: a cop, a roleblocker, a JOAT, a one-shot doc, AND a tracker. That's five pretty good power roles right there. And we definitely have four of them.
I believe you are completely wrong here.The Fonz wrote:I'll try to dig up the MD threads, but suffice to say, I don't think a mod should ever allow an investigator to be switched without telling him.
No, you get "guilty" or "innocent." Period.The Fonz wrote:Why?
Imagine for a second you're a tracker.
If you targeted X, and he was switched with Y, saying 'you saw X target Z' is directly lying to the player. Saying 'you saw Y target the player' is true, because it tells you precisely what was intended- your tracking, with the caveat that it wasn't on the person it was targeted to.
I meant in general, not in particular to this game, turkey.The Fonz wrote:Haaaaaaaaaaaaang on... wait a second, you're supposed to BE a tracker in this game. Surely you know what format results are in?DrippingGoofball wrote:"home" or "not home" or some such equivalent then.ac1983fan wrote:A tracker doesn't get "guilty" or "innocent"...
Vote: DGB
Hammah Time!
I will be RBing CTD.
So did I... For hours I looked for a secret "edit" button...Nightfall wrote:When I saw DGB's *'s post my head hit my desk, I knew if one of us were to be taken out we were likely doomed.
I thought it would fit well with the fake claim.Nightfall wrote:@ DGB, I must ask though why did you claim Boardwalk and a hotel?