Im gonna read what I missed, but until then
I dont trust anyone yet.
Grimmy
Quite the opposite.Nightfall wrote:Grimmy, are you proposing we name claim?Grimmy wrote: I tried to make a list of what roles could be assigned to certain properties in this game. I would also assume that this could be a breaker in the game if everyone name claimed.
I'm getting deja vu here...
this whole game is about speculation. it support the "No Nameclaim" idea though, imho.Alabaska J wrote:also grimmy, the name thing does nothing to help the town. i refuse to turn this into "let's outguess the mod!"
and Jebus, I think you may be on to something with this Yawetog thing. Those things you quoted look pretty fishy. Still wanna hear from gamma first though.
but three lefts do.Spolium wrote:Two anti-towns don't make a right.
it was a joke.Spolium wrote:For the record, I think we can be fairly sure that they were all jokevotes - see my observations in #225.Nightfall wrote:<For the record I think we should remember though that we aren't certain yet that they were just joke votes>
I guess Stalin, Chairman Mao and Casto all ended up on the right, for all intents and purposes.Grimmy wrote:but three lefts do.
Were you actually making a point here? If so, it escapes me.
Highlighted my favorite part.ac1983fan wrote:Well, nothing's going to go on unless people do something.
So I guess I'll be that person.
fos: alabaska J
Don't ask for analysis but not post any good content yourself.
vote: grimmy
You're only long post is just speculation on the flavor that corresponds to roles, which isn't really to useful. Other than that, you've made six posts, two of which were joke posts, one was explaining a joke, and one was your 'checking in' post. That leaves two posts which I would consider semi-useful. There has been plenty of stuff for you to comment on, why haven't you done such?
I still find jebus scummy,but if grimmy's play so far isn't anti-town and/or scummy, I don't know what is.
Question: what are your thoughts about AC doing basically the same thing?Alabaska J wrote:this is a bullshit reason to call someone definitely scum. just sayin.charter wrote:Given opinions on quite a few people. You haven't.Nightfall wrote:Excuse me... I was one of the very first people to argue against your ideacharter wrote: Nightfall is definately scum, he has still not added anything to this game.
of mass name claiming and have continued to debate that issue with you as you haven't seemed to want to give it up... What else have you contributed?
Might as well throw that vote back on me now, pilgrim.ac1983fan wrote:I replaced in one week ago. Grimmy seemed incredibly anti-town, so my vote was mostly because he wasn't contributing anything relevant whatsoever. Posting non-contributive posts can be worse than not posting. I feel like all of my posts have been contribution. Asking for analysis but not posting any isn't helpful. I'm trying to be helpful. Grimmy has apparantly decided to be helpful (hopefully), although I'm willing to vote him again if he restarts his anti-town behavior. You are not really being helpful, all your doing is trying to cast suspicion on the person asking the person asking for analysis to post some of his own.Alabaska J wrote:speaking of not posting a lot of analysis, you've posted shockingly little yourself. one post on how you thought grimmy was scummy and then you take it back immediately after one post defending himself. grimmy was hardly the biggest offender. if you were gonna go after people for not contributing, we have people who don't even seem to post anymore. i'm finding you fairly hypocritical right now.ac1983fan wrote:Again, he had only made one large, non-joke post at the time of my voting him, which was mostly a list of possible role names. So kinda, although I'm willing to go back to voting him if he starts posting non-contribution posts again.Alabaska J wrote:so did you not see his post earlier ac? or were you just trying to pressure him into more analysis?
Also, why don't you post some analysis, Alabaska?
this is why he voted for me. I accept that he will be the wet towel in my swimming pool of fun for this game.Alabaska J wrote:so did you not see his post earlier ac? or were you just trying to pressure him into more analysis?
to spur some conversatications, I shall put my opinion into this question.Alabaska J wrote:Jebus wrote:Nightfall, why is a 3 man wagon (putting whoever it was at L-4) in the RVS scummy?
what made it look suspicious was that one after another, despite the number of other players in this game, the votes piled up on one player.Jebus wrote:Zilla - nice avvy. Also, waiting for your response...
Why is it suspicious for a random wagon on one person in the RVS?Grimmy wrote:to spur some conversations, I shall put my opinion into this question.Alabaska J wrote:Jebus wrote:Nightfall, why is a 3 man wagon (putting whoever it was at L-4) in the RVS scummy?
Its has always seemed suspicious when a number of votes get tacked on to one person in the RVS, because there are so many options to place a random vote, it seems suspicious that people would pile them on to one person so early in the game.
Grimmy
yes I am insane, thanks for asking. And yes, I would like fries with that!
I Agree that this part makes ooba/gamma suspicious and would like to hear ooba's side of the story.Nightfall wrote:Under pressure Gamma seemed to crack. Which is why he had my vote for day 1.
Gamma wrote: 1. when have i been acting like a sheep?
2. active lurking can be applied to you. don't accuse me of not being up to your activity standards, I have a life.
3. you're only saying this because charter called you out on it. So fuck this shit. I'm not listening to it at all.
if it is for this reason, then I would be a hypocrite when my work flow outweighs my mafia time and I post rarely.Zilla wrote:I propose we pressure lurkers back into the game, and I'd like to start with the people who haven't contributed much in their posts anyway, hence Alabaska.
I dont get this part.Zilla wrote: I don't like this: as if the case on Alabaska is just because he's not posting? No. Again, I'm very critical of Grimmy if Alabaska comes up scum.
Nightfall wrote:Zilla, I think this might be what Grimmy is talking about.
Grimmy wrote:im keeping my FOS.
why would he have the character name, and not just the name of the card like the rest of us?
(im counting me and the people who died in that tally)
i think he stretched a bit too far in this fake claim
Grimmy
what did it say before?StrangerCoug wrote:Rule 6 has been changed, so I recommend you take another look at it.
3rdeded with some notesNightfall wrote:2nd that vote.ac1983fan wrote:vote: relax the punishment on ongoing game discussion being a modkillable offense
this game now has the potential to be EPIC!!!DrippingGoofball wrote:Yeah you'll be lucky if half the players don't quit...ac1983fan wrote:We're getting some good replacements now, and I like that.
Lemme break this game wide open.