Mini 760 - Bleach Mafia: Karakura Town - Game Over!

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #3 (isolation #0) » Sun Mar 15, 2009 7:52 am

Vote: Seraphim

Melancholy Mechanical fakeclaiming scum have no place here.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #6 (isolation #1) » Sun Mar 15, 2009 8:07 am

I KILL U RAMPAGE! MEHEHE

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #12 (isolation #2) » Sun Mar 15, 2009 8:59 am

Nomnomnom...

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #32 (isolation #3) » Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:11 pm

Holy Sledgehammer of Babylon? Sheesh, how corny can you get?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #34 (isolation #4) » Sun Mar 15, 2009 11:19 pm

Didn't he unvote?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #36 (isolation #5) » Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:03 am

We're only on page 2, Phily.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #42 (isolation #6) » Mon Mar 16, 2009 10:30 am

My thoughts exactly.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #71 (isolation #7) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:56 am

GladOs, is your processing thing a post restriction? Also, I don't find it strange that I thirded a notion I found true.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #73 (isolation #8) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:01 am

Scum, but I want Phily to answer first.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #89 (isolation #9) » Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:50 am

I think Phily could be scum. That's why I was holding off on GC until Phily gave me something to work with. How is this hard to understand?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #91 (isolation #10) » Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:02 pm

Don't forget he misrepped my earlier post.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #129 (isolation #11) » Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:51 am

Green Crayons seems bent on misrepping my earlier post.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #131 (isolation #12) » Thu Mar 19, 2009 11:14 am

Nope. Green Crayons later said THE EXACT SAME THING that Gius said.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #134 (isolation #13) » Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:11 pm

I clarified, Green. Right after Gius. Then you came up with the same argument reworded.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #137 (isolation #14) » Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:42 pm

Exactly. Which is why I didn't ask for something to work with. I had just gotten it.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #152 (isolation #15) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 3:54 pm

It's not a contradiction. I'm still trying to decide whether or not Phily is scum. I won't vote for Green Crayons until I do.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #162 (isolation #16) » Sat Mar 21, 2009 2:56 am

Why should Phily have anything to do with a vote on Green? It doesn't
Are you incapable of voting one player and still questionin another? Yes, if I believe the player I'm temporarily voting for isn't my lynch target
Are you a person who believes that once you vote you aren't allowed to change it later? No.
If you have reason to vote green, do it while you wait so you might be able to have something come of whatever it is you suspect green of.
And unless I'm mistaken your last... 4-5 posts deal primarily with green, what the hell are you waiing on Philly for? It's called observing his posts. You should try it.
Did you ask him a question 2 pages ago and just forgot to bring it up again or do you think Philly will just come out and say something to catch your fancy? No. I didn't ask him a question. So yes, I do think Phily will come out and say something to catch my fancy.
Saying you are trying to figure out if so and so is scum while not actually doing anything along the lines of, you know, trying to figure out if he is scum, is bull shit. have you even commented on anything Philly has posted? No. It interferes with my observation
have you asked him a single question? No. It interferes with my observation
Have you responded to anything about him at all? No. It interferes with my observation
Ever? No. It interferes with my observation
And yet somehow you vote on Green is influenced by this so called non-existant scum hunt process you aren't doing with Philly? I'm not voting Green because he's not a lynch target for me at the moment. I'm scum hunting by observing Phily's posts, partially because of a gut feeling about him. I'll question him when I have something to question him about.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #164 (isolation #17) » Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:52 am

You. It's a gut feeling.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #171 (isolation #18) » Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:27 pm

PhilyEc wrote:Corniness was intended.

FoS
on non speaky people. I dont wanna be dragging lurkers from the shadows when this game is big on players. Could result in them not being noticed.
And yes Guiseppe I stole this theory from you from ze other game~

This has been bothering me since the beginning of the game. You seem too eager to prove to us that you're town.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #173 (isolation #19) » Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:36 pm

That's not the point. I've been observing you because of my discomfort with this early post.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #175 (isolation #20) » Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:26 pm

Your behavior after that post is helping me draw conclusions on your alignment. (Leaning town at the moment)

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #177 (isolation #21) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 1:26 am

THANK YOU! Someone shares my philosophy on LAL.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #180 (isolation #22) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:38 am

Not necessarily.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #208 (isolation #23) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:19 am

I'm not worthless. Phily is looking more and more like town, while Green Crayons seems to be falling under the radar.

Vote: Green Crayons

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #223 (isolation #24) » Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:36 am

Green, do you find it a suitable response to simply parrot someone else's logic?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #229 (isolation #25) » Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:12 am

Green, post 73 wasn't a contradiction, and I've explained why about three times.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #231 (isolation #26) » Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:01 pm

I'm also disturbed at the fact that Gorrad has intentions to rely on his "gut feeling" more than logical scumhunting.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #243 (isolation #27) » Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:17 am

Vote: Deadline Extension

Green, I was suspicious of Phily more than you. I saw you as scummy, but I wanted Phily to respond first. How is this a contradiction?