Hi Zazie. <3ZazieR wrote:Korlash, you're here ^.^
Also, /in before Tajo
About Korlash, I have mixed feelings towards him....
Nyeh, good to see you around here, Kor. Hope this time you indeed listen to me.
Unles you are scum, obv obv.
Hi Zazie. <3ZazieR wrote:Korlash, you're here ^.^
Also, /in before Tajo
LOL, you are lying this early?Korlash wrote:I don't know... Not listening to you caught me two scum last time around...
Pffft.Korlash wrote:Calling something day one, and actually doing something about it day one are two different things. i can sit here and systematically call out everyone as scum today, but come endgame that doesn't make me super cool mafia player. The fact you called Farside/mirth and it took 5 days to lynch them after the fact makes you a good guesser, but a crappy player. Not meaning an insult here, and I'm hoping you don't take it that way.Pop wrote:I was the only one calling farside-mirth scum as early as day 1. I was the one who caught them. My only mistake was trusting Crazy that tricked me well.
Also, good job in thinking Kublai Khan was scum instead of freaking scummy Mirth in Lylo.
And uh, good job not making it to LYLO to set me straight. Yeah, see I can turn that one back around on you!
Oh, where have I heard this before...Vino wrote:Fishy's argument is highly logical.
Sure. It has no bearing on my opinion on roflcopter this game of course, but I'd love to rub in his face how wrong he was last game and how right I was.Lamont_Cranston wrote:@Vino:Would you care to expand more on that game?
On day three a cult claimed, but roflcopter insisted we lynch me instead in the very next post. Despite the fact that I correctly guessed one of the mafia and argued that we should lynch the claimed cultist (he turned out to be the CR) they lynched me. The next day was a travesty -- town had almost zero chance of winning at that point, and their vote pretty much decided if cult or mafia won. It was a sad, sad game.
Win some, lose some.
Why dont you like the Vino "wagon"?Lamont_Cranston wrote:I don't think I like this Vino wagon at all.
Mod Votecount please.
I would support the Emp or Korlash wagons at this point.
Unvote, Vote Empking
He needs to be postingmore.
This isnt serious, right?Lammont wrote:I support a Korlash wagon because he blames other people for his loss in LYLO.
Lammont, how is his mistake in Lylo in another game a valid reason to support his wagon in this game?If he isn't blaming you for his mistake in LYLO please let me know.
I like Vino's description of his last game with rofl. He is a player that we need to have around at this point. What evidence do YOU have for voting him?
So, you think Emp is deliberately lurking here?Finally, have you played with Emp anyone who deliberately lurks before? Yes.
1)Lammont I think you are missing the point here. How are his actions in another game related to the actions made here?Lamont_Cranston wrote:1) Its not hispopulartajo wrote:Lammont, how is his mistake in Lylo in another game a valid reason to support his wagon in this game?If he isn't blaming you for his mistake in LYLO please let me know.I like Vino's description of his last game with rofl. He is a player that we need to have around at this point. What evidence do YOU have for voting him?
I dont have any evidence to vote him. Only a gut feeling from his first/second post. This is random stage.So, you think Emp is deliberately lurking here?Finally, have you played with Emp anyone who deliberately lurks before? Yes.mistakein another game, its hisblaming of that mistakeon someone else.
2) No doubt he is lurking. The game is in full swing, he saw then when he posted his "/confirm". He just posted confirm and left. He needs to be rung up and forced to post...regularly.
facepalm.Lamont_Cranston wrote:Kewl. Well you look super fun to play with and so I withdraw my support of your wagon.Korlash wrote:No, I never said anything about him convincing me. I'm saying you can't claim to have "called out scum" on day 1 unless you also recognize your failure at lynching those scum day 1 as well. If you call player A out as scum but are incapable of lynching them and end up lynching Player B, you have no real claim to fame at calling player A out. The game of mafia isn't about calling people out as scum, it's about proving they are scum and forcing everyone else to help you kill them.
And FYI I didn't lose in LYLO. Being wrong and losing are two different things. I had two super awesome townies watching my back that saved us the game. And yes, Pop had some small hand in it as well.
Vino wrote:I'm not looking at pure numbers. It's not a "4/25 = 16% chance of scum" thing. I'm looking at the nature of the bandwagon and its members, and the reasons they gave for joining it. In other words, I think that of (Korlash, roflcopter, populartajo) probably at least one is scum. Fishy made a random vote and three people jumped on it with zero provocation or reasons listed, you don't think it's likely that at least one of those people was scum?
First, I always do scumlists. Its not scummy at all. Also, what do you mean with it only helps scum?hasdgfas wrote:FoS: tajo
first off, we have a list ofeveryonewith where he places them on a scum scale. Always scummy, because it's just so.......out there. It only helps scum. If anyone wants me to explain why, I can, but if everyone understands what I'm talking about, I'll just leave it there.
And then he decides to defend people using the "random stage" defense. Uggh, It's nearly impossible to explain just how scummy that is.
Can you elaborate on your gut?Head_Honcho wrote:I think the lammont case is weak but is probably going to happen. I saw the phrase over enthusiastic used to describe him and I think that's probably it. Populartajo and fishy look scummy to me. Tajo's a gut thing, fishy's the post you just cited.
Check all my games in my profile. I mean it. All of them. Ask some here. I always use scumlists regardless of alignment.hasdgfas wrote:Do you have links of games where you're town and scum where you do scumlists?populartajo wrote:First, I always do scumlists. Its not scummy at all. Also, what do you mean with it only helps scum?hasdgfas wrote:FoS: tajo
first off, we have a list ofeveryonewith where he places them on a scum scale. Always scummy, because it's just so.......out there. It only helps scum. If anyone wants me to explain why, I can, but if everyone understands what I'm talking about, I'll just leave it there.
And then he decides to defend people using the "random stage" defense. Uggh, It's nearly impossible to explain just how scummy that is.
Im not sure Im following your logic here. You say Im scummy for doing scumlists because it tells scum who the townies think is town. That means you think Im town telling the scum who I think is town. Which means that you just made a case against a townie. Nice.hasdgfas wrote: One of the main things I look for when figuring out if something's scummy or not is whether it'd help the town if the whole town did it. With scumlists, it doesn't help the town, because it tells scum who the townies think is town, and doesn't let the more townie players live to later days.
So whats exactly scummy in RANDOM bandwagoning Vino the way rolf, me and Korlash did?hasdgfas wrote:"RVS"(which is crap, IMO, and why I hate people using it as a defense, because it's still a real part of the game), is a great time for scum to let their guard down and do something scummy that they can then use "Random stage" as a defense in.tajo wrote:Second, about the random voting stage, do you at least know what I am talking about?
Vino and Lammont started attacking Fish, rolf, Korlash and me because we joined a wagon in random voting stage. What is so scummy in joining a wagon in random voting stage? Explain it please.
Vino wrote:This also bothers me.
"Come on guys, let's lynch somebody quickly, doesn't matter who it is!"roflcopter wrote:btw, lets keep this momentum going people, don't just unvote and sit on your hands.
dude, does the fact that this thing happened in page 2-3 mean anything to you?the silent speaker wrote:I see a group of people who are bandwagoning along what looks like coordinated agendas. An agenda of "deflection from rofl to Lamont or Vino, and ideally 1-2 mislynch of Lamont and Fishy" looks like it fits the facts. My inference from that is that the people doing the bandwagoning are scum, and my secondary inference is that the people being mislynched are town.
Kay, has I think I get your idea. I did have a reason (semidecent/semijoke but at the end a reason) to jump to that wagon. I agreed with fish analysis of Vino's first posts.hasdgfas wrote:There's nothing inherently scummy about joining a wagon in "RVS". However, you can't jump on a wagon, and then later say "but it was the RVS." That just doesn't work. You have to have a reason for jumping on the wagon to make it not look like scum bandwagoning with no chance of getting called out on it because it was the "RVS".populartajo wrote:@Has, what exactly are we discussing? You think the "random stage" excuse is for voting someone is crap. Its not. I repeat. What is so scummy in joining a wagon in random voting stage? Explain it please.
I didnt put words in your mouth. I was asking. Im trying to understand your thought process here.Vino wrote:Holy crap don't put words in my mouth. Talk about misrepresentation, I didn't say anything about TSS. I don't know why you think I think he's town, I never said that, and I've been criticizing him recently. What I said is that rofl's statement strikes me as trying to rush us into another bandwagon without thinking about it, what's so wrong with that? Trying to direct other people to vote without analyzing and deciding what they think is decidedly un-townie behavior.populartajo wrote:So that means that you think the silent speaker is town and rolf is scum rushing town into a bad decision or what is it?
When exactly did I say this?Vino wrote:There's the second time in one page you're implying another player is inexperienced because he has a different opinion than you. I'm not quite sure what to think of it.
I fail to understand something. What exactly makes me scum? The fact that you disagree with me about the analysis of a randomwagon?HeadHonch wrote:The issue is not whether or not random bandwagons ever happen. This has been mentioned over and over again but you still seem so incredulous every time someone brings it up, which I see as scummy since you were defensive about it from the beginning. 'Random bandwagons' are what get the game going, and are usually the first point of interest in so many games, I don't really understand why in this particular game they should be disavowed because they happen frequently. In this case, a large portion of the bandwagon was because people liked to say 'solid', which is a fun innocuous way to hop onto a bandwagon and then stick around if it actually takes off seriously. Maybe the guy you're bandwagoning gets 'omg too defensive' because he's taking your random bandwagon seriously, the nerve! So then you can say 'omg overdefensive much? my vote is staying' or in this case 'omg someone defending him get them'. I don't think it's fair or genuine to say that there is no possible scum read to be gleaned from a 'random bandwagon'.
Dude, do you even know what double standard means? Please explain clearly why the posts you quoted are an example of double standard.HeadHonch wrote:I also liked this little double standard, small but significant.
Of course it implies criticism. Lammont not liking the Vino wagon and preferring the Emp and Kor wagons was really weird, as his posterior reasons provide:Head_Honcho wrote:Sorry, I thought what I meant was obvious. When you referred to them as wagons it was okay, when Lamont referred to them as wagons they became "wagons", which implies criticism, and I don't really get where that criticism's coming from.
Also, did you just say sorry to a person that you suspect?Lamont_Cranston wrote:Based on the evidence we have & the criteria that qualifies potential lynchees this early in the game, Vino ispopulartajo wrote:Why dont you like the Vino "wagon"?Lamont_Cranston wrote:I don't think I like this Vino wagon at all.
Mod Votecount please.
I would support the Emp or Korlash wagons at this point.
Unvote, Vote Empking
He needs to be postingmore.
Why would you support the Emp and Korlash "wagons"?nota proper lynch candidate.
I support a Korlash wagon because he blames other people for his loss in LYLO.
I support an Empking wagon because anyone that posts "/confirm" and leaves needs to post regularly or be lynched.
Its not scummy at all. I think its not optymal as it provides a weak reason to suspect people. Tell me what do you get from looking at it?Head_Honcho wrote:I don't know when I said that stuff about it being infiltrated by scum, I just think it's scummy to be so adamant that nothing can be gleaned from looking at it.