Drmyshottyizsik has received multiple warnings and multiple recent bans for breaking site rules. A ban serves the purpose of having users not engage in continuous patterns of behavior that break site rules once the ban is lifted. It isn't lightly that we enact longer bans, but we consider the following rule-breaking behaviors to merit a longer ban:
Drmyshottyizsik has posted under multiple threads with excessive spam. Listed below is one example of spamming, following a moderator stepping into the thread discouraging continued spamming:
[spoiler="Speakeasy User Popularity Poll" thread.]
In post 2308, drmyshottyizsik wrote:A THING I'M GOOD AT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Endles quote pyramids, somone get kappy in here!In post 2304, Cheetory6 wrote:shitposting
In post 2309, drmyshottyizsik wrote:I'm sorry for my spamming I thought, as a thread we agreed to do this.
In post 2310, drmyshottyizsik wrote:I'm sorry for my spamming I thought, as a thread we agreed to do this.
In post 2311, drmyshottyizsik wrote:Sadly a lot of threads turn to this.In post 2302, mykonian wrote:Yes, that's a couple of entire pages that have little to do with the topic at all. Stay classy, MS.
In post 2312, drmyshottyizsik wrote:I'm sorry I will stopIn post 2303, Mina wrote:Yeah, I'm not going to call anyone out by name (and this applies to too many people to single anyone out), but as a PSA, it would be nice if everyone toned down the spamming/shitposting in this thread a bit.
p-edit: dammit, myko!
In post 2313, drmyshottyizsik wrote:I took this way too seriously, I'm sorryIn post 2304, Cheetory6 wrote:The obvious solution to this is for people to shitpost until Chev cannot stand it any longer and has to update. Keep it up everyone.
In post 2314, drmyshottyizsik wrote:awdon't feel bad, it's the speak easy. I still don't understand why it's no longer 62, but eh
[/spoiler]In post 2315, drmyshottyizsik wrote:In post 2306, beeboy wrote:Quote Pyramid go! Cheetory is right we need to shit post!
Drmyshottyizsik made a thread titled "Kublai Khan" with the intent of harassing the user and encouraging others to do the same. Users are allowed to critique behavior and decisions specific to the role of a moderator, but opening a thread asking for open-ended thoughts about a user and then saying the user is "in a mood today" is not a mod-specific complaint, it is an attempt to generally harass a user, which is against site rules. Being a moderator doesn't open the floor to the moderator being personally harassed.
[spoiler="Kublai Khan" thread.]
In post 0, drmyshottyizsik wrote:thoughts?
[/spoiler]In post 6, drmyshottyizsik wrote:I don't know, he is in a mood today.
Encouraging other users to engage in banworthy behavior qualifies as testing the boundaries of site rules. This is clearly inappropriate behavior.
[spoiler="First one banned wins" thread.]
In post 0, drmyshottyizsik wrote:Go
In post 4, Kublai Khan wrote:Can't see this thread being a good idea.
In post 5, drmyshottyizsik wrote:why not? I don't think it violates any rules that I'm aware of does it?
[/spoiler]
Reopening a thread after a moderator has locked it, as linked in the prior spoiler, is also clearly inappropriate behavior.
Finally, Drmyshottyizsik has PM'd users falsely suggesting that once he buys the Mafiascum site from mith he will ban them. This sets up a false sense of authority and leads users to falsely believe Drmyshottyizsik will soon have power to punish them, which can deter users from posting normally or feeling comfortable on the site.