Someone voted him out of the blue and he quickly began to make random votes to make it seem like a big joke.
The fact that he is being this attentive makes him scum in my eyes.
The fact that you kinda defended Jordan tells me 2 things:SocioPath wrote:Oh the irony of how that is directed towards Jordan.X_~ wrote:You seem to not know the real purpose of the RVS stage. If you don't provide valid arguments for your vote, then what is the point of RVS if people are just going to take it as a big joke.
In fact, I did considered a town defending a town, but I wanted to see Sociopaths response to that....who knows, maybe sociopath knows Jordan is a townie hence the defending. Mason? Of all the people being voted, he defended Jordan. That is why I only listed 2 out of the 6 possible scenarios.LlamaFluff wrote:First, im going to call you X from now on.X_~ wrote:The fact that you kinda defended Jordan tells me 2 things:SocioPath wrote:Oh the irony of how that is directed towards Jordan.X_~ wrote:You seem to not know the real purpose of the RVS stage. If you don't provide valid arguments for your vote, then what is the point of RVS if people are just going to take it as a big joke.
1. Jordan is mafia and you are not.
2. You are mafia and Jordan is not.
Why?
Because if Jordan is mafia, I don't think that one of his teammates are going to all defend him all of the sudden.
If Jordan is a townie, I can definitely picture you being mafia trying to defend a townie to build trust.
Second, you should vote data, it will be a good early wagon.
Third, lotta flaws here. While I am a player who hates the random phase and will tend to try and end it as fast as possible, this isnt the way to go about it. You are setting up a logical fallacy here to start, by saying either situation A or B has to be true, while ignoring all other scenarios. The most obvious scenario that you are discounting is one of my favorites...
Town defending town. If you are good with getting town reads, its completely understandable to defend one of them. I have done this a whole lot of times before, and will do it in the future as well. Just like a scum read, you have to push your town reads. Nothing is scummy about defending someone you have pegged as town.
Listen, if this was a normal day 1 I would approach this in a different manner. Remember, this game started at night, and 2 townies and 1 mafia died.OpposedForce wrote:Hey guys.
Vote:Josh Lynman
Btw I think that you're looking into to deeply in the RVS of the game, X. Most of these votes are lighthearted and shouldn't be taken too analytically to assume scenarios or accusations on the votes thus far in this stage of the game.
Well if Jordan is a new player, I can picture myself being excited too. So I will step back away from Jordan andLlamaFluff wrote:lol what? Thats a wierd reaction to me asking for a wagon on you.Datadanne wrote:Llamafluff is obv a jester.
Its just a good spot to start a wagon. Dont role fish for information on why I think its a good wagon. If I do have information, it will show itself soon enough.X_~ wrote:You want me to start a bandwagon against Datadann, and I have no idea why?
Your reason, "this is a good vote"
But you never stated WHY this is a good vote. When you have more knowledge than the rest of us, I suggest you somehow let us know; otherwise, I don't think people are going listen, well not me at least.
That's a poor reason for unvoting. I approve the Jordan vote though.Raivann wrote:Unvote, Vote:Jordan
I'll take Faraday's word on Tjoe as Ive never played with him before.