MacavityLock wrote:
Unreasonable
Paranoia - His intro and only post talks only about Raising and reactions to it. He just FoSes me and Magna, doesn't vote. If you think my post was bad, why wasn't it worthy of a vote?
I did think it was bad; but since all I was basing my fos off of was one post, why vote someone based off of it? I usually wait until I have more reasoning beyond "I don't like this one possibly insignificant thing." before I vote someone. I'm also more laid back with my vote considering we have plenty of time to reach a decision; plenty of time to post and for scum to slip up in.
To Mina: I considered Macavity more suspicious at the time; honestly backing down from that for now. My suspicions of Illusion was more based on a perceived connection with Macavity. The reason I withheld from going after Richard as I read him a bit flustered at the time.
On to other pressing matters...
To Danakillsu:
I find her/him blatant picking up onto the Kleedrac wagon without a vote her testing the waters and to see if the bandwagon will indeed shift again before deadline I find that this is a likely attempt to test the waters on a possible upcoming wagon without wanting to commit to it if it can be avoided; I believe Dana is scum trying to appear town on a potential wagon on a scum buddy without condemning him unnecessarily. The fact you use a weak reasoning like "Well so much has been said already I got nothing new to contribute" does not excuse you
from providing reasoning for your suspicion.
So could you get back to me on that?
So on that note.
Vote: Kleedrac
For what I believe to be a connection with dana, I find his vote based on Drip's raise vote tying the raise votes, and in general just trying any way to justify his vote on Drip without justifying it in the slightest. I don't like the "you're all scum." comment right now as there are 18 pages so far; more than enough to get a preliminary read on several people, I would think. The "first game and wall of texts frighten me mommy
" posts are trying to justify lurking and basically being Non contributive overall; the fact you've been omgusing Drip for awhile while providing NOTHING besides blatantly untrue claims just keeps making you look worse. The fact you built a case and then blithely ignored it in favor of someone you haven't even had the decency to build a case on just makes it feel like you're grasping.
This is in opposition to:
Raise: Mina
Out of what I've had the time to read and see right now, I truly believe Mina is the best person to raise at the moment; She is asking intelligent questions, doing legitimate analysis and scum hunting, and is in general leaving me with a warm fuzzy feeling. Every post of her's brings something new with it and I trust her to use the double vote wisely.
Preview Edit: In light of Dana's most recent posts, I am even more sure there's a thread between them and Klee. The entire circumstances around their vote is "well all I had was gut." thing when she was going "OH MY GOD THIS IS SO TRUE I SHOULD VOTE FOR THIS." bit is just inexcusable.
Considering a vote shift.. I'm having a hell of a time deciding who I consider worse at the moment; Dana or Klee? I am considering
Dana
far worse at the moment; it could just be blatant bandwagoning on an easy target that a loud voice is pushing for. I still stand by the opinion I think they were testing the waters around the Klee lynch and waiting for it to pick up steam before casting her lot in with it.
unvote
Vote: Danakillsu.
