Friend, 519 wrote:Xvart: 6 votes is greater than 1/2 of 11.
I stand corrected; but my point still stands on how you think it is an easy bandwagon when so many people are calling you town?
Furcolow, 523 wrote:there's an even scummier one for you xvart, but it is a whole bunch of
I don't even know what this means, or to whom you are referring.
Friend, 539 wrote:Additionally, the response you've given to the pressure on you is...well, it's scummy. Although I can't place my finger on why. It feels just like the way experienced scum would react to light accusations of them - shooting it down mercilessly with more aggression than logic.
What pressure? A few votes with sketchy justification at best? You're trying to make someone more scummy in an attempt to derail your wagon instead of trying to prove you are town to derail your wagon.
Erg0, 556 wrote:My original point was really that xvart appeared to be creating a situation where he could let others do the work in building the wagons, and then jump onto whichever was convenient. It wasn't so much about the actual alignment of the people being wagoned.
Misrep? If you recall, I picked a wagon and got on it (Friend). I wasn't waiting behind the scenes to see which wagon was more "convenient." Early bandwagons, especially competing bandwagons, can show a lot further down the line. At that point, Friend and Gandalf were the two scummiest people in my eyes, but you can hardly say with a straight face that I was waiting to jump on whichever one was more convenient.
animorpherv1, 563 wrote:I've been helpful in town games. Namely, SWN II, when I pay more attention, I can do real well.
So you aren't paying attention? Or do you pay more attention in town games?
ReaperCharlie, 564 wrote:So, in essence, you (ooba) agreed with his (Faraday's) non-existent case the most out of any that existed at the time, and now you're grasping at straws for a reason to vote for me, even after Faraday unvoted?
(and if you want even more WIFOM, ... YOU were the one whose vote I sheeped the first time, which may have been why he considered me scummy in the first place...)
This is an excellent question. I don't recall Faraday even saying anything about Reaper other than he is scum with a vote.
Andrius, 608 wrote:1) You're hitting some obvious VI[?] town players for a lynch. Namely Furc and gandalf.
2) You are supporting RC in his quest to be useless.
3) You have like, no outstanding scum reads. You're obviously hitting some of the more obvious scummy players, but there is no way in hell they're all scum, let alone one of them.
Also, you're posted 5 times. I also don't like how you only target the same people every time: the easy lynches and Faraday.
Calling Erg0 as potential scum-buddy #1 if you flip scum, BTW. Faraday as a distant possibility.
(And yes, there is a bit of gut involved here, but there is logic behind this suspicion, whereas my scum-read on Erg0 is pure gut ATM.)
1. Well considering the people you refer to as VIs are spamming the thread
and
behaving suspiciously, I don't really see the problem here.
2. You can't seriously be trying to use this as justification of me being scum. A one sentence joke? Can you? And why didn't you comment on my
similar comment about zwet?
3. I think I made it clear that my most obvious scum reads were Friend and gandalf. How many scum reads does someone need to announce to be town?
4. This is actually my fifth post, and if you're asking me to apologize for not spamming the thread you better think again. Five posts in four and half days would typically be sufficient, and considering the amount of spam, nonsense, and increasing page length every time I log on I don't see the problem here, either.
To sum up, your case on me is mostly nonsense, and is mildly scummy since justification two and your afterthought are severely reaching.
Furcolow, 573 wrote:This guy has made 2 posts: one of which was deep speculation, and the other was bandwagonning on a townie
It is not enough to warrant me voting, but I've got my eye on chronopie
If by deep speculation you mean essentially repeating what is in the first post, I suppose. The second, "bandwagoning a townie" isn't really so obvious to most of us considering your behavior.
@M=W
- can you explain your meta argument about Friend? What in his meta shows that he is likely scum in this game?
xvart.