Time to burn through 97 pages in a short amount of time.
If anyone could give me a summary of how they think the game currently stands, that would also be dandy. I might ask specific people in future, but whatever.
Hi Gurgi. Reading terrible VI play from past days is almost as bad as watching it unfold personally.Lord Gurgi wrote:Hey Singer, maybe you haven't figured it out yet, but it looks like one cult is about to have a majority, which means we need to lynch FROM THAT SPECIFIC CULT. That also means that lynching someone from the other cult would be OPPOSED TO OUR WIN CONDITION AT THIS PRECISE MOMENT.
Think before talking, I swear.
Hi Darox. How's it going.
ReaperCharlie @ Gurgi, with regards to singer wrote:Gurgi. She is ALREADY RECRUITED. That is PAINFULLY F#%&ING OBVIOUS.
Remind me again why we suffer you to live, when Mr. Obvrecruit Andrius over there was the one who cleared you as town?
FoS: Lord Gurgi
Not to mention you make NO sense.
Also. I swear. xvart, we need to hydra soon, I think my brain might explode otherwise.
ReaperCharlie @ Gurgi wrote:Cue: Gurgi defending the guy who investigated him as town.
OH WAIT SH*T HE BEAT ME TO IT. THE GUY IS TELEPATHIC.
Gurgi can swing too.
How do you explain these posts on day 3 RC?ReaperCharlie @ Andrius, with regards to Gurgi wrote:Uh....
'cause you are obviously recruited scum, and tried to clear him as town. Last time I remember somebody doing that... hmmm.... OH WAIT, IT WASMEIN HARRY POTTER CLEARING JMJ/MAGNA AS TOWN, AND HE TURNED OUT TO BE MY SCUM BUDDY. THEN HE PROCEEDED TO SKATE ALL THE WAY TO ENDGAME AND A BEAUTIFULLY PERFECT SCUM VICTORY. HERP DERP A LERP
What about my proposed direction?Lord Gurgi wrote:Why are you being goaded by Ooba? Stop it now. We're going down the wrong path here, I'm just not sure where the right path is. Probably with all the people that haven't been posting since the Ooba wagon picked up again. Prozac needs to post more, Erg0 needs to be shot more, I have had enough from RC, Andrius, Robo, ooba, and the cultist PR campaign.
1a: Andrius has survived 4 game days and 3 nights since claiming cop. I don't think it would be much of a risk claiming to be a third cop.ooba wrote:RC is a bad lynch
- I have a non-recruiter vibe. Misguided townie or tunneling scum but not recruiter
- Setup argument : one would assume there to be more than one enforcer .. And since it's possible LyLo I'd expect any others to have claimed already.
- Ask yourself these questions .. If I'm a recruiter, Would I risk my head by claiming cop ? Even if I wanted to push an ooba-lynch, why not ask a minion to do it ?
I've already explained why claiming enforcer doesn't put you at risk at all and in fact strengthens your ability to stay alive. Especially doing so on day 4, after the roleblocker has claimed and what looks like 4 LC actions have been taken.ReaperCharlie wrote:@ Quag: Giggity. Love your poker face. And whatever you decide to do, hurry up, either way. And preferably, vote for ooba.
@ Darox: rofl. Cause I'd TOTALLY stick my neck out/paint a target on my back if I was a recruiter. Yeaahh that makes sense.
- By risk I did not mean the risk of dying, its the risk of situations where he is counter'd e.g "I am a roleblocked. I blocked RC yesterday - couldn't have got a innocent on Chronopie".ooba wrote:1a: Andrius has survived 4 game days and 3 nights since claiming cop. I don't think it would be much of a risk claiming to be a third cop.
1b: Confirmed power roles have been pretty much decided to be guaranteed non-recruiters
2: Having two negative cop claims helps bolster support, and with the lack of his own cop power he can't get too creative with his own results (Relying solely on Andrius' results and whatever he can learn/fake as a recruiter)
3: Pushing a lynch on an 'easy' target means a day without one of his members being lynched and brings him closer to victory. The fact you have survived 2 game days since Andrius claimed his No Result on you shows it's going to take more than that to get you lynched.
I despise this sentence with every fibre of my being. I'd be willing to vote you based on this alone if the singer business made any sense.ooba wrote:Robo:I personally feel you're a recruit since the hop on-to my wagon was too easy. Wouldn't you rather try for the opposite recruiter?
This however made me laugh.ooba wrote:- Push a case very strongly on somebody else
Ok now it looks less scummy as hell, just poorly worded.ooba wrote:Not really .. I was trying to figure out why each person was voting me and convincing each of them .. Robo's jump looked like "Hey. Here's an easy mislynch" scum jump .. Vezo's actions gave me a clear non CR read -> There recruit .. Thought the only way to appeal to a recruit is to tell him I'm not the opposite CR he's looking for and ask him to jump on ..Darox wrote:Saw that, still sounds scummy as hell.ooba wrote:Read properly.
"Robo: I personallyfeel you're a recruitsince the hop on-to my wagon was too easy. Wouldn't you rather try for theopposite recruiter?" - If he's a recruit, he should be gunning for the opposite recruiter ..
This is why I was against lynching Ooba. If there was a fourth LC (And the kills suggest that), then Ooba as recruiter could have instead recruited them and thus learned what he needed to know to fakeclaim. (Couldn't have recruited Zwet because duh)Yosarian2 wrote:I'm not sure what you're saying here.Darox wrote:I just noticed that the 3 claimed LC/4 LC actions discrepancy would explain the singer/ooba confusion, so unless Yosarian comes and tells me cults have the ability to night kill, I'm suddenly more amendable to lynching Ooba.
I'm also not sure how ooba could possibly be a recruiter here. I just don't get it, at all. I get the cop thing, but I don't at all understand how he knew the vigs were called "loose cannons" on day 1. The theory that he knew that because he recruited singer night zero and then used that to breadcrumb day 1 seems really iffy, especially considering how long singer was voting for ooba during a part of day 2 while ooba was in real danger; a recruit bussing her recruiter on day 2 doesn't make any sense at all.
Singer has claimed a Loose Cannon role. They apparently have either a one shot night kill OR a one shot double vote ability. Singer chose to use the double vote ability day 3.Quagmire wrote:Alright so I'm reading over the ooba case.. haven't started reading what's d2 and beyond yet, so I'm still trying to pick up what's happened in this game so far. Why are people suspicious of me/Erg0? Was Erg0 just a general lurker?
Someone other than ReaperCharlie explain these points to me. Tell me if he is right/wrong, and why he is right/wrong about these points:
So it's my understanding that during the game singersinger vigged someone at random. How do we know this isn't a case of a user making a silly 'newbie-like' decision? Can someone who has played with singersinger give me an idea of his meta? Is he one of those players? And what is thisReaperCharlie wrote:1.Why would signersignercompletelyunless she was protecting someone? i.e. herself or a recruiter. Answer:wastea vig shotSHE WOULDN'T. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO REASON TO.
3.We don't know that signersigner is a loose cannon at all.She hasn't proven anything except for a mechanic which only ooba corroborates, and that the only confirmed loose cannon NEVER MENTIONED. Which leads me to the next point.
4.We don't know that theIn fact, I'd bet good money that it?????vote was singersigner.wasn'ther. It could have been anyone, not just her or ooba. The whole thing is, we KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THIS SITUATION. WHICH MAKES IT ALL FISHY.?????vote ReaperCharlie is talking about?
Singer and Ooba have both claimed the Loose Cannon role. He means they are the only people to confirm that the other has the role and how it works.Quagmire wrote:What is the connection between signersinger and ooba? What is 'corroborates' in this context?2.We don't even know that ooba is a loose cannon at all.He hasn't proven it except for claiming a nightkill that could have been a scum nightkill. Which was on one of the most pro-town people in the game at that point.
5.The ONLY person who corroborates ANYTHING signersigner says is.... ooba. Great.
6.The ONLY person who corroborates ANYTHING ooba says is.... signersigner. Great.
OK, I'm going to read over this and hopefully get started on stuff d2 and beyond.
#2: We don't know at all.Quagmire wrote:How do we know 2, and 4?ReaperCharlie wrote:What we Know
General
1. There are two recruiting factions with one recruiter each. This is splained in the modposting.
2. Current speculation is that cultscum factions can either recruit or kill, once per night.
3. All players who started as town have role PM flavor about what they want to do when this is over.
4. It's pretty much LyLo. Unless you're in the big cult. See "Yosarian2" below for more info.
Yup, saying lynching recruits is a waste of time and then voting someone I think is a recruiter is a total contradiction.ReaperCharlie wrote:Thank you Captain Obvious.Darox wrote:Lynching recruits is a waste of valuable time, and it also dangerously shifts the balance of power. If one cult gets repeatedly culled while the other goes unchecked, it will end up too numerous for the town & opposing cult to combat, and they will win outright even if they lose their recruiter. Obviously, we don't want this to happen.
wait, after what you just said...LOL?Darox wrote:But if it'll help you sleep at night, I'll vote RC because I still think he is a legitimate lynch choice today.
Aim: ReaperCharlie
Yarrrr... this is absolutely incredible. keep throwing that sh*t around to see where it sticks.Darox wrote:Gandalf is the greatest lynch.
Aim: Gandalf
Quick before Flay notices.
I would actually be down for a Darox lynch if we can't push the ooba one through.
Though I believe we can, and I believe it is the best lynch.
This is awful terrible awful and makes me suspect you are part of the cult. "It doesn't matter if you don't think there is a good case on Ooba, lynch him anyway because hey, everyone on Ooba is town because I said so."xvart wrote:I actually would think the opposite: that the large cult doesn't want ooba dead and has the numbers to practically necessitate everyone that is not in their cult to coordinate against them. Anyone town and everyone not in ooba's cult that has not voted needs to put a vote on ooba now.Lord Gurgi wrote:It's pretty obvious that the large cult wants Ooba eliminated, but it's not enough for them to win, or they would have hammered already. That's good. I'm more inclined to lynch Gandalf since he's third in popularity and I don't think Quag is particularly a better lynch.
The fact of the matter is that ooba has evidence against him (whether or not you think that is good evidence is beside the point now). The other suggested people that might be recruiter are Erg0, Prozac, Gandalf, and for pretty much the same reason: lurking, flying under the radar, etc. So... with three options there, you want to take a chance that one of them is more likely the recruiter based on what? Where is the distinction? Why vote gandalf over Erg0 or Prozac and vice versa?
ooba has more evidence against him than the three that are all guilty of possibly being a recruiter based on similar playstyle.
xvart.
If someone comes up with incontrovertible evidence against Yos or Glork they get their asses lynched right away. I think you're confusing incontrovertible with "Hey guys I'm totally lacking in town cred or proof, and I think Yos is scum!"ReaperCharlie wrote:Honestly gandalf, if you even are town, it's your own fault you were lynched. If not... then... well, you got what was coming to you anyway.
I have gotten lynched a lot. It blows, so all I had to do was learn what NOT to do. And then.. wham-o! A miracle!. I stopped getting lynched.
For example:
Even with incontrovertible evidence against someone like Yos, Glork, or SpyreX, they still usually don't get lynched for at least a day or two.
Why? Cause they're exceedingly useful as either town or scum. Conversely, useless people don't need half a reason to get lynched. i.e. you.
No offense meant by that last, but if you're upset about being lynched as a townie for the gazillionth time, then it's time to look in the mirror.
Oh god that intro is so terrible why would anyone think this is good.ReaperCharlie wrote:Also try reading this: https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... ood_Townie
Why am I on this list yet Gurgi isn't?Porochaz wrote:Mobsters still in the building:Actually the list of people who could be cult recruiter is a little larger. We should be lynching someone in this list today as they have no support along with there claim. The rest do to varying extents. Totally trusting RC and Andi in the latter days would not be smart.
inHimshallibeKatsukiDarox- Investigated Town (RC #4)
Erg0Quagmire*- Scum? (A #4)
Flameaxe*animorpherv1
vezokpirakaRobocopter87- Claimed Consigliere (Supported by Yosarian)
- xvart*
Yosarian2*- Investigated Cultist (A#3)
Cult Recruit =/= VTPorochaz wrote:Yeah yos, as a confirmed cult recruit, what do you think of claiming?
Where did I say I'm going to take their words at face value? If I follow your advice, I wouldn't be able to do even that anyway.Porochaz wrote:Im sorry, I forgot this was the game where everyone tells the truth and we should take everything at face value. What makes you think yos is even remotely interested even in this game anymore?
Mostly it was an afterthought of asking Gurgi, to give you a chance to not be a blob, which you are. You could pretty much be replaced by an unmarked double vote.Yosarian2 wrote:Dude, why would i claim? And if I did, why would you believe me?Darox wrote:Cult Recruit =/= VTPorochaz wrote:Yeah yos, as a confirmed cult recruit, what do you think of claiming?
"useless blob"? You guys very likely would have no-lynched yesterday if I wasn't here, and the same is probably true today. I'm quite useful, both to the town and to my faction. that dosn't mean I'm going to sit here and give the town all kinds of information that does nothing but hurt my side.I see no reason in not giving Yos a chance to stop being the useless blob that he is.
It's almost like I am fully aware of this and explained the situation in depth and how it's not a stretch at all for my theory to have occurred in my previous posts.ReaperCharlie wrote:You cannot base a theory that I am a recruiter on anything other than that Andrius is scum as well, and has been scum with me since Day 1.