![Image](http://img.youtube.com/vi/JjjHugowRYE/0.jpg)
I have arrived.
Enjoy my dramatic entrance (Or my whip if you like that more) for now. The read will come tomorrow.
No thanks. I’m much more interested in lynching Dram.xRECK wrote: so ya'll can lick on DEEEZ NUUUUUTZ
No worries, xRECK. As you should have read, I'm not stating that it's obvbuddying. I'm only stating that it seems you're misusing the 'alliances'.xRECKONERx wrote:If one more person tries to say that the CAPS LAWK/buttsecks alliances are obvbuddying I'm going to slam my head against a brick wall. You guys are seriously reetahdud.
Why is quadz still breathing?
Oh, and Quadz town. That's why.Zaz wrote:Not liking xRECK as well. He gives me the impression of mis-using his ‘alliances’. Also, his BV vote is so scummy. Following a weak case is your reason, xRECK? But what did you do when you voted Gandalf, which was based upon a misrep?
Talking about that vote of yours, how come you didn’t spot Dram’s misrep?
Also, now that you know Dram’s vote was ‘wrong’, what’s your opinion on it? Did it come from Dram-town or Dram-scum and why?
Is this your answer to all my questions I've asked to you or is this explaining why you didn't answer them?xRECKONERx wrote:Because I'm not really paying attention.
xRECK wrote:I'm defending dram because I don't think he's scum, I just think he has a weak case.
Want to explain, xRECK?xRECK wrote:Dram, I think it was clearly a case of RVSDON'T MAKE ME VOTE YOU I DON'T WANNA
Mod wrote:quadz08: 7 (inHimshallibe, Nautilius,xRECKONERx, Devotress, Midnight's Sorrow, Chronopie, bill1148)
Even you aren't voting BV, xRECK. Him asking Fate to vote BV isn't helping him either to look more town.xRECK wrote:Seriously. More bv310 votes would be appreciated.
No way is that equal to what you stated, Dram.Gandalf wrote:I’dwonderhow you could have figured me out with one post >.<
Exactly my point. From your posts, I get the impression that supporting weak cases is scummy to you. So why is it that you're stating that there was scum on Dram's 'weak case-wagon', but that you 'defend' Dram, eventhough you didn't like his action?xRECKONERx wrote:Explain...what? I don't want to vote dram but he was pushing a weak case on a RVS vote.ZazieR wrote: As you might remember, there was something else I wanted to talk with you about, xRECK. And now we can:xRECK wrote:I'm defending dram because I don't think he's scum, I just think he has a weak case.Want to explain, xRECK?xRECK wrote:Dram, I think it was clearly a case of RVSDON'T MAKE ME VOTE YOU I DON'T WANNA
So the reason you weren't voting BV before being called out on it, is?xRECK wrote:But I'm always READY to vote bv310. Like so:Zaz wrote:xRECK's newest attack against BV is wrong as well. Read again and you'll find out that he's not voting you based upon you not responding to posts with questions aimed at you. You are just trying to shift the attention elsewhere. For those interested in why I'm saying this:Mod wrote:quadz08: 7 (inHimshallibe, Nautilius,xRECKONERx, Devotress, Midnight's Sorrow, Chronopie, bill1148)Even you aren't voting BV, xRECK. Him asking Fate to vote BV isn't helping him either to look more town.xRECK wrote:Seriously. More bv310 votes would be appreciated.Unvote; Vote: bv310.
As pointed out, Nero had a different reason to vote Devo. But I'm glad to see this, because it means that you agree with me that Nero is scummy.Glork wrote:Suppose Player X and Player Y commit the same "scumtell." Player A makes a case against Player X for the scumtell, and there is discussion about X and yadda yadda yadda, X eventually gets lynched as town. Both Player Y and his scumtell fall largely off the radar, especially as the game continues (especially since today's MS meta involves a lot of forgetting about past cases and events), and Y never really gets attacked or suspected for having commited the same scumtell, which is just as legitimate as the case that A used to get X lynched.Zaz wrote:Nero needs to explain his vote against Devo. Because it seems to me that it comes down to disagreement about mafia theory and Devo asking only one player a question. And to both I’d like to know why that makes Devo scummy.
There is a strong A-Y scum connection here. Though Nero didn't identify who specifically he felt Devo was favoring (and I can't yet either -- there are a lot of scummish lurkers in this game), I would assume that Nero feels that Devo is going to shine the lurker light on "SUPER POPULAR BANDWAGON QUADZ," try to finish off an already popular lynch, then forget about the whole lurker thing. At least, that's how I personally feel about it.
You're calling me out, but not Bill? Seriously? I could have accepted it had you called out Bill that he should just respond to my posts as ignoring based upon how you're called is BS. I could have accepted it had you called me out on my ego, but also Bill. But just calling me out, while letting Bill do as he pleases, I cannot.Zaz wrote:Zazie, please explain why your antagonization of Bill about his name is a protown decision. If it's alpha-male bullshit, please swallow your massive ego like a hot load and call him Bill. Thanks in advance.
I remember getting a PM in which you state that I was getting replaced. Afterwards, I check the thread and see that I am replaced. So don't blame me for not posting.Kise wrote:Zazie PM'd me ONCE AGAIN BUT ISN"T POSTING COME ON ZAZIE POST BECAUSE THEY DONT BELIEVE IVE BEEN PMING YOU