I'll keep it as concise as possible here.
My vote on Substrike:
I posted that I found scummy that he only came out of lurk mode to defend his Cupcake vote and address nothing else. In his next post he did the exact the same thing and so I posted that he had "proven my point" and voted him for that.
His reasons for voting Cupcake had nothing to do with my vote on him. I disagreed with his reasons, yeah, but that's not why I voted for him at all. At that time I thought Cupcake was scum, too, and I stated my reasons for why I was thinking that and how my reasons differed from Substrike's.
My vote on diddin:
Yep, this looks odd, because originally I didn't have a vote in my post. I added it after hitting Pedit and seeing diddin's over the top scummy post. If anyone wants clarification why I think diddin/ZONEACE is scum, I'll elaborate, but it seems that ZONEACE has been MIA again.
My sudden(?) case on GIS:
When I first posted in this game, suspicion was already cast on chess and there was no point in making a case without repeating what others had already said, but I agreed with the points against chess. I presented a small case on Cupcake later on and a short while after that town seemed to be split on the LL/Ythan/Cupcake debate. So I took the time to look at some ISOs of suspicious people (same thing I advised people who were struggling to catch up or annoyed by the spamfest by LL/Ythan) and I came across GIS' ISO and made a case on them in order to try to get town out of that LL/Ythan mess and look at other people.
DTMaster wrote:It's funny to see this argument (the lack of scum hunting argument is a scum sign) over and over when I also notice a lack of scum reads from Dekes in ISO #2.
I do not like at all that you're trying to frame me for this. I've been pretty transparent and open with all my suspicions and you quote a single post from me where there are no apparent scum reads by me and you call it lack of scumhunting/suspects. That's an awfully weak attempt to strenghten your case.
So that's that.
I'm surprised this post did pass by unnoticed:
Hinduragi wrote:Hey Exilon, why are you going for LLD? Why are you not going for Cupcake?
Vote: Substrike
The neighbor thing seems town. If not, it will bite them in the ass later in the game.
Huh? Care to explain? You think neighbors are town, yet you're voting the first neighbor that has outed himself?
I'm in the "There'so scum in the neighborhood"-faction. Masons claim they are aligned. Neighbors claim they are not aligned. Mods confirm there's no bastard modding involved. So I'm going with that. And I still approve of a Substrike lynch. He was scummy before the lynch, during the lynch and afer the lynch. Could help clarify the situation.
@Substrike
How is Chrono's standing within the neighborhood?
@Chrono
How is Substrike's standing within the neighborhood?
And now to the shift. Since I see no motivation for scum-Exilon to come forward like this unless he really wanted to trade one scum for the PGO, plus the evidence of D1 (btw, remind me to check -13 on Cupcake, she may not have been targeted after all) and the fact, Exilon is not dead makes me a shift-believer.
Now we don't know yet if the shift value changes every day, unless every player votes for themselves (or we find the person who's missing his vote in the process) and I doubt we'll get everyone to vote for themseleves.
Pedit: Where did you read the Rolling Attack definition, DTM? Did Kairyuu post this in thread? Or did you get it from the Wiki? Because I was under the impression that a wagon would be destroyed and you couldn't vote that person anymore and not that the persons on the wagon would lose their votes?
Well, if latter is true, I'm gonna test this out on Nikanor. Since I have a vote on me already and Nikanor should've been hit if -13 is still active, maybe it'll clear things up.
Vote: Nikanor