Ditto. This is going to be a long game.Benmage wrote:Man, I was really hoping to be scum this game
It should be fun though.
Shoot.Benmage wrote:How much you willing to stake? (For my self, no nothing of the copycat)Percy wrote:ITT: Scum explain how happy they are that they're not scum.
I agree with Percy's vote here. I'm thinking we have a similar problem with Sotty's comment. I don't recall IAI ever saying pointedly that Benmage's plan is scummy, yet she presumes that and gives him a question from that presumption.Percy 52 wrote:Sotty7 wrote:IAM, if Benmage's plan was scummy, why aren't you voting him?Vote: Sotty7
Yeah, we covered that.jason 61 wrote:IAM had indicated the plan by Benmage was scummy, Sotty rightly questioned himn over why he wasnt voting if he thought the plan was scummy. I would have done the same
No, it's not. For the same reason it can't be written off as IIoA. If he would've just posted the statistics, then you may have something. As it stands, he made it a point to give analysis.Benmage 66 wrote:It's filler posting. Thats why its scummy.
You don't remember me, jason?jason 78 wrote:I have never played with him so am curious to know what you mean.
No worries, it was a genuine mistake. I think I saw IAI's post, but then I saw your vote and immediately I went back to the earlier IAI post (40) because I didn't remember him saying that the plan was scummy. When I confirmed it, I just moved on from that point and onto the next page to write my own post.Sotty 83 wrote:I mean that Red is a very capable player so him making a mistake that was so obvious was out of character. The more I think about it, the more it is probably null. Nobody is perfect after all. But I'm not discounting the possibility of scum Red screwing with my mind.
This is a null tell. That's about the earliest I've ever seen anyone "give up" though. IAI, I think you should take a step back from this game a lurk for a day or two. Just read what other people say and come back to it after a while. You don't need to make a post every few hours, and you certainly don't have to beat yourself up over three votes. The people most unimpressed with you are among the most vocal, but that doesn't mean they make up the majority. This game has many weeks to go yet. Just calm down and roll with the punches, bud.IAI 88 wrote:Do you know what else is a scum tell...voting for yourself.
Look, I'm saying you have a fair argument against Oso. I could easily see Oso trying to make a big stink over something minor in anticipation of me having to admit missing a crucial piece of information. On the same token, Oso had a point to call me out, and he has since tapered down his sense of grandiosity, as you labeled it.Elmo 105 wrote:My point against it being (partially) that it wasn't valid?
How do you suppose we remedy that? With discussion, with cases, with responses... all of which everyone should be taking a part of. There's no reason to lecture about the importance of bandwagons 5 pages into a game. How contrived sounding.Furcolow 109 wrote:I see some people are not on the wagons with multiple votes, yet lynching is good for town D1 as it gives the uninformed side of things we're on information.
What? Explain what you mean.Furcolow 109 wrote:I know the setup is open, too, does anyone have any idea as to the most likely setup(s)?
It's completely over-the-top and flat out incorrect. He's jumping on IAI for IIoA when IAI was clearly analyzing the game. Benmage, as town, should've either recognized that or went in a different direction with his accusations. There's no reason to continue to press on a point like that unless you're just hard up to get into a shouting match.Mina 110 wrote:What in particular about Benmage's reaction was suspicious? How do you think Town Benmage should have reacted?
When you say, "can't keep track of your own posts", I'm assuming you mean, "can't keep track of other's posts". If this is wrong then let me know.Mina 110 wrote:This is the lamest vote ever, and feels like deflection. If you can't keep track of your own posts, why do you expect Nikanor to do it for you?
Aren't you just jealous that your name isn't on that list?Mina 110 wrote:This feels like sucking up.
You're definitely going to have to elaborate on this one. I'd also like you to talk a little bit more about Oso in your next post (especially if you're taking a liking to Elmo's arguments).Mina 110 wrote:I was going to ask Zach to prod Furc, but apparently he's posted...and is probably scum. Goody. I may just change my vote to him tomorrow.
I'm this close to saying that you sould lighten up a bit. This close.Percy 115 wrote:And if it was an "easy dig", is it any easier than saying "I'm so sad I'm not scum, SO SAD. SRSLY guys SO SAD, **SO SAD**, I'm town and SO SO SAD"?
Is it a coincidence that you're already voting him or not?Nikanor 117 wrote:The jasonwagonofone needs more love.
I noticed this as well. This IAI/Benmage thing is pretty divisive.Furcolow 134 wrote:also, the town seems really really split on benmage
Hm. It's a pretty big coincidence I guess, given that there are 16 players in the game.Nikanor 138 wrote:My first vote was random. Now it is serious business. Why does it matter?
Elmo 141 wrote:Shouldn't you already know he was lying? What did you see?jasonT1981 wrote:ok,i see above he is lying.... Im happy with my vote. A claim like that could have outted a real cop.
I don't buy this. jason sounds like he's scrambling here. He slipped up.jason 149 wrote:my vote was based on your rolecop claim, claiming me as scum.. at the time I thought you were being serious and I had not realized it was all vanilla.
kingdavid and Furcolow didn't use it as an excuse to get defensive and lose their cool. jason clearly overreacted. Everyone knew Nikanor was lying. Hell, I even told Nikanor immediately after he "claimed" that I wanted him to be serious.Mime 161 wrote:uhm... so when kingdavid says he forgot it means nothing, but when jason says he forgot it's a scumtell? Seriously?
I'm still happy with my vote.
The first time I read this I kind of discounted that, but it is a bit of a weird transition from you to Nikanor. Eh, it's still a bit of a stretch though. Hold onto this to look back at it in D3 or D4.IAI 175 wrote:Sotty said, let's try something else. Could have been a message to me, could have been a message to a partner on the wagon with her.
Let me put it this way. jason was being voted by just Nikanor at that point if I remember correctly. That would mean he was at, what, L-7? The game just started. Even if he didn't think the setup was Mountainous, why did he feel compelled to immediately vote him in response? Why did he skip my post? Why the "you are lying!", then, "oh, I see now you are lying". It doesn't sound right. There's too much going on here to sound real.Sotty 179 wrote:I see your follow up to Jason in post 169 but you should know that being defensive isn't a scum tell.... So what?
Wait, IAI said you were townie? Do you have this post? I don't remember this.Sotty 180 wrote:The fact you threw in a dig on a player who you later state is probably a townie doesn't make you look good. I stated that I felt your direct question to benmage was more than a little bitter sounding
You're very difficult to follow. So you think both Oso and Dry-fit are scummy, correct?Furcolow 183 wrote:Dry-Fit is a good lynch. I wouldn't mind us quicklynching him.
Heh.IAI 187 wrote:Cause I'm a day cop.
Of course.Mina 188 wrote:Can people tell me if this is normal with RedCoyote?
Well, the whole reason I voted Sotty to begin with was because I missed IAI's post, not my own. I see what you're getting at though, you're talking about my Nikanor vote. There's not much to say that I didn't already say. If you don't buy that explanation you just quoted here, then you don't buy it. I don't think it's as simple as a "generic 'stop posting fluff'" vote. It was a little tongue in cheek too, you realize.Mina 188 wrote:No, I meant "can't keep track of other's posts." I meant "can't keep track of your own posts." Because I think it's ridiculous that you voted Nikanor for not commenting on a mistake you yourself made.
Because I don't particularly care for Furcolow's posts either. The post you quoted was a good example, and it's what turned me off initially as well.Mina 188 wrote:...But wait a minute. Why did you ask me this question? Because you didn't agree with my Furcolow read, or because of something else? (There is a very specific reason I'm asking this.)
Then we clearly have different approaches to the game. Since your side is seemingly winning out, it's probably good that your reaction is in line with the majority.Percy 195 wrote:Jason thought (or so he says) there was a day cop claiming a guilty on him. I'd be defensive and react strongly too...
Huh? On D1? That early in the game? With no clear lynch candidate? A Cop isn't intended to be a 1-to-1 cancel out of a scum role in any mafia game I've ever played, but certainly not in a game this size.Percy 195 wrote:This is odd. If he really was a say cop and got a guilty, then of course he should claim. That's a cop's job.
Look at the situation again:Percy 195 wrote:Jason's stumbling is now providing some justification, but I fail to understand how jason's reaction is scummy, rather than just a reaction from someone who is busy and didn't read the setup. Just like Benmage who didn't know about the instaflips.
You do realize he was probably joking before you freaked out?jason 201 wrote:I have been thinknig this overnight.. If Nik was seriously down to business like he says he was... why would he have to fake claim a daycop to try and justify keeping his vote on me which was random at the start but now 'serious' business.
I'm just being lovable ol' me. I can't help it that Mina can't get me off her mind. It's a curse.Sotty 204 wrote:It's not. That's the problem.
It was, what's the problem?Benmage 205 wrote:Pecy’s 1 post of content is all good?
Yeah, I don't think that. I think he's an okay guy. I think you're the one who's wasting time tunnelling on a slot you supposedly see as town.Benmage 205 wrote:Does anyone at this point not think IAI is a huge, wasted slot,TOWN-noob?
I thought you told Percy I was one of your town reads. You seem to be all over the place, Furcolow.Furcolow 212 wrote:town-reads:
percy
oso
myself
You fess up (that you don't know the setup) and then you drop it. I don't get why he had to beleaguer the point. He wasn't in any sort of threatening situation. It's paranoid looking. The worst possible damage that could've been done had he not started flailing his arms was that he'd have been lynched as a VT and then the town would've been all over Nikanor.Sotty 221 wrote:What would you expect him to do then for it to seem real?
Like I told Mina, it wasn't anything major. He seemed to be tunnelling, but it's nothing to rest a case on, in my opinion.Sotty 221 wrote:What happened to the Nikanor wagon?
You know why this is, right? Because he's scum. He has completely knowledge of the game, and it's throwing him off exactly what he's "supposed" to say as a VT.Locke 224 wrote:Jason just comes across to me as a bit clueless and lost. His votes and accusations thus far seem like someone who hasn't got a handle on the game at all.
This is getting on my nerves a bit. "IAI doesn't look town because of his meltdown. The meltdown makes him look town, though."Oso 229 wrote:Neither looks particularly good to me. IaI for his meltdown (which I hate to admit does point to a townie coming unhinged under pressure from my experience
That's a pretty good point. I hadn't considered this. Still, it's a pretty big assumption to write three people off for. You'd also be writing off mongoose for this, right Oso? He admitted to the same thing.Oso 229 wrote:I'd bet money right now that if Zach opened the mafia quick-topic for pre-Day 1 discussion, the fact that this is a vanilla game came up. In my mind there is a decent chance none of the jason/IKD/Furcolow trio is scum.
Agreed.Furcolow 233 wrote:We have about 2 weeks still to lynch, so this isn't damning, but JasonT should have his vote out somewhere by now.
That jason was acting like a normal VT.Percy 234 wrote:My side? What side is that, exactly?
The entire argument is moot given the setup, so it has no bearing on anything relating to jason or this game as a whole.Percy 234 wrote:Also, of course a daycop with a guilty should claim. What if (s)he's the first NK? Sure there's an argument for waiting for a little while to observe them, but I don't see why it's a bad idea.
And anyway, aren't you saying that Jason is the bad guy here? He's the one that said it was scummy to claim so early, iirc.
I don't see the connection. I don't care for Benmage and his over-the-top anatagonism towards you, but I don't know if that makes him scum or not. IAI seems townie to me.Percy 234 wrote:How is this different to Benmage vs. IAI? Especially with the "forgot" comment.
Poor you.jason 238 wrote:as I said, I am the popular wagon.. this all feels like a easy jump on to me.
Talk about fencesitting. This sounds like you're laying the groundwork to get onboard the RC wagon. I have no idea what "irrelevant and silly stuff" you're talking about. The so-called "questionable points" is just a buzz word for you meaning, "Hey, I don't feel like reading this player thoroughly, but I know someone else brought this point up at one time or another, so, yeah, just consider me seconding it".mongoose 239 wrote:There is alot of irrelevant and silly stuff, along with some questionable points (like his votes on sotty and nikanor, I didn't quite catch the reason for those). However there has been alot of stuff I think is townie behavior as well.
...but he said he didn't understand the wagon on me. Explain, please.Sotty 245 wrote:Mina, I have a town read on Locke because I have agreed with everything he has posted so far. Simple really.
She just said she thought he was town based on meta. Fur, this is the third or fourth time I've been unimpressed with you.Furcolow 249 wrote:oh
well, if you know him on a personal level, what do you find his role to be?
IIAI 256 wrote:Question for the group, did the following strike a nerve with anyone?
This is the comment I was looking for. This is the best summary of my wagon yet. Bear in mind that Mina and Mime (Kscope) have never even played with me before.Nikanor 262 wrote:The RC wagon is meh, as I don't really find him suspicious. As far as I can tell the whole wagon is just based on gut and meta.
Scroll up to my last comment for Percy in this post.Benmage 264 wrote:What do both of you think of IAI and myself. Please repeat if you've previously stated...i just wanna keep everything fresh.
jason said that Nikanor was lying about him because he's not scum and votes him. A couple of minutes later he says, "i see above he is lying" refering to Nikanor admitting the obvious fact that there is no Cop in the game. As Elmo pointed out, there was no need for the second post. The second post shows jason's first post to be a complete sham. The first post is just a forced reaction.Benmage 264 wrote:What is quite telling?
Benmage 265 wrote:dry-fit and RC are both good lynches.
These contradict. Explain.Benmage 266 wrote:7. RedCoyote -null
9. Mina -null
10. Furcolow –worth policying
15. KaleiÐoscøpe –null
12. Imkingdavid – null to scummy
5. Percy-100% scum
8. Locke Lamora-scum
14. Dry-fit - scum
Not a fan. I wouldn't be upset if he was lynched.Benmage 276 wrote:***********I want everyone to weigh in on their view of Dry-fit in their next post.
Agreed.Mime 277 wrote:Furcolow seems to like any lynch that either is generally agreed upon by the majority, or that threatens him.
I don't like jason or Furcolow. Something doesn't sit right with me about Sotty still. I don't care for Dry-fit much. mongoose just tickled my fancy a little bit a possible scum member. I boldly claimed that IAI is townie looking. I think Oso, Percy, and you have all done well enough for now (at least until this post that is).Elmo 279 wrote:He's just so totally unoffensive and middle-of-the-road though. Literally almost everyone who's been posting regularly has found something to take issue with or press or do something somehow.
Why are you trying to cut a potential Furcolow lynch off at the knees? I'd love to see his wagon move up to the top. Him being ignored by some of the more active players has been criminal. I think a lot of players here are currently phoning this game in.Benmage 289 wrote:I don't think furc is a viable lynch. Not enough interested...Not for the first lynch at least.
Huh? How am I supposed to convince you of anything if you don't ask me anything? I was ambivalent about your vote until here. I'm not a mind reader. I assumed you were actively reading my posts and eventually going to start making points against me. I also assumed that someone would actually force you to back up your positions, but so far everyone has been content to pile on against me given that it's the easiest thing to do (read: Sotty, Benmage, Furcolow, mongoose, and to an extent Elmo and Percy). At least Mina has been upfront about voting me on the basis of gut. You've just been, and continue to be, an enigma.Mime 292 wrote:I still like the RC wagon because RC has not convinced me otherwise to not keep my vote on him.
I have no idea what you're talking about here. No, I may not have been as verbal about Dry-fit (mostly because I've been working my ass off to both sell this jason lynch and defend myself in the process), but in no way can you stretch that post to his defense. I've not been particularly satisfied with Dry-fit, and I won't cry if he gets lynched either. Then again, I can think of at least 7 people who I'd be happy to have strung up. That's just how I roll.Kscope 300 wrote:Then in post #169, he even throws a half ass defense for dry-fit for no reason whatsoever.
I know... it makes me nostalgic though. <3Kscope 300 wrote:You should really try to call me KScope, because I doubt many people know who you mean if use my other name
"I don't know why people say RC is scum, but he's voting me so I can see it now."Fur 323 wrote:I wasnt sure why people would say RC was scum, but I dislike his vote on me and can see why he would as scum.
They're turns of phrases. Obviously they aren't meant to be taken literally.Fur 335 wrote:italicized: he's not SATISFIED with dry-fit... on his scumteam?
underlined: him not crying... over a player lynched? why would he want to cry at all? i dont get the thought process of even having to say that.
I wish I could say the same of you.Percy 438 wrote:Goddamn, you sound town here.
Ugh, you know, Baby might not be a bad lynch. Benmage and jason would be pretty bad follow-up lynches, and Percy is far from obvtown. This is such an awkward read on the game though... so awkward that it may just have to be coming from a VT.Baby 431 wrote:Vote Benmage
Benmage and Jason are the lynch. Not Percy, not obv town. Just those two scum.
Wait, wait, wait. What happened to Sotty? She's a town read for you now?IAI 437 wrote:Reread the thread:
My Top 2
Percy & Nikanor
Runner Ups: Red, Baby Spice, and to a lesser degree, Furcalow, Mina, and Lrdwhyt
You and Mina have been the only two players to make a big deal over something so trivial. I want to say it's indiciative of a sloppy skim through the game, but I actually think Mina is putting forth an honest effort into her analysis. I mean, you could've very easily put a little trollface at the end of that post. Although I genuinely didn't like Nikanor's start, it wasn't some big thing.Lrdwhyt 462 wrote:RedCoyote's voting Nikanor for not pointing out his own error was a dumb vote.
Fair enough, but given that it's loaded with most of your "biggest town reads", shouldn't that console you?Sotty 465 wrote:Considering how haaaaard it was to lynch Dry Fit I am weary of the Percy wagon because of it's speed. Yeah deadline is somewhat near, but I dunno it feels off to me.
Did you vote anyone besides me during the first part of the day? If you did, it wasn't for long. This goes back to your absence though, because, regardless of whether you intended to focus a lot of your energy on me or not, it looks that way due to long stretches of inactivity.Mina 466 wrote:For example, saying how "Mina is so focused on me" when I hadn't really attacked him that hard. Repeatedly making forced jokes and talking to people like they're naughty little children. I can give a list of quotes, but it's so many little things.
After reading over the thread a little more closely, I kind of want to back away from this position. I tried to make it clear in my summary as well as the body of text, but I probably should've just went back and deleted this sentence altogether. I've been erratic on my IAI read, so I kind of deserve this hit. I am still curious as to why IAI has seemingly dropped you from his radar, but all in all I don't really think there's anything sinister between you and him anymore.Sotty 474 wrote:Slap fight? This sounds like you are playing down the opening exchange I had with IAI in an effort to make it look scummy. Just come out and break down what you find scummy about it, these kind of subtle jabs don't look good.
I did as you asked. I went back and read over your posts. I found that you talked with Locke about IAI and realized that y'all both have similar opinions toward him. You also answered a question he asked about Nikanor, and... that's it. No mention of Kscope whatsoever. I think you're being dishonest here, Sotty. Either you're being dishonest in saying that you actually had explained why Kscope and Locke were your town reads, or you're being dishonest on account of the original accusation I made.Sotty 474 wrote:I explained both my town reads on KScope and Locke, do you have an actual issue with what I stated?
I don't know, Elmo. Do you mean different in the course of this game or different from Hoopla's game?Elmo 480 wrote:Red. Again, seriously - you're playing different; why?
I'm sorry they're not as well thought out as "he sounds like an old man". Is there anything about Fur that strikes you as particularly town? It's hard for me to explain why exactly those things are scummy if we have such a fundamental difference of opinion.Elmo 480 wrote:In particular this needs an explanation because all of those are pretty horrible reasons.
These are almost as bad as Baby's suggestions. They seem completely arbitrary in light of Dry-fit's flip given that both of them were virtually removed from the discussion. Perhaps this is exactly why they speak to you, but I couldn't disagree more.Elmo 480 wrote:I think we should be lynching someone off the wagon, but I'm not sure precisely how we narrowed it down to these two. Like, no-one has brought up Mina or Nikanor yet, and I don't know why.
All due respect, fitz, but that doesn't really answer the question. Although I like you going after Sotty, it just doesn't seem like the most opportune time to do so. Further, when there have been allegations issued against Percy, you should address to some degree with either agreement, disagreement, or what have you. If Percy hasn't done anything scummy, why are we wrong for thinking so?fitz 495 wrote:The only thing scummy regarding percy IMO was his absence from the Dry-fit wagon. But that doesn't really mean anything as not everyone off the DF wagon can be scum and I would be surprised if there was scum on the DF wagon as well. The "big omission" is due to an absence of suspcion.
You did sneak a Kscope comment in there, my mistake. I retract that.Sotty 498 wrote:See, this makes no sense to me. How does calling out my two biggest town reads hurt the Dry-Fit wagon? I also voted Dry Fit in the end which is more than you did, so your stance that it makes me look worse is pretty ridiculous.
One's a small, closed, mostly hand-picked game with quite a few power roles, and the other is a large, mountainous, mostly open sign ups game. I don't think I'm being different. I think the environments are probably as different as two games could be.Elmo 509 wrote:Different from Hoopla's game.
I dispute that. He's being far too emotional, contrived, and flighty.Elmo 509 wrote:I don't see why at all. Your reasoning is completely independent from my opinions, which you still haven't given. You have just stated "Fur did X" and implied it's scummy without explaining why. Very probably we have different premises, which is best dealt with by stating yours.
When someone is as unprincipled as Fur is, I've found it to be a potential indicator of scum. I'm not just implying here, and I backed my rhetoric up with a vote.RC 392 wrote:Furcolow is absolutely all over the place. Not just in the above post, but throughout this entire game. He's on full panic mode now and letting every emotion go that he can. He's a complete loose cannon. If you haven't paid as much attention to his posts throughout this game, you owe it to yourself to check him out in isolation. If he's town, he's too weak-willed and emotional. Every time I've looked the other way when someone has tried to appease everyone he could, I've regretted it. In general I've found that scum are more likely to placate in a manner similar to Fur.
Unlike some people, I don't know how players will flip. I was very clear that I didn't want Dry-fit to be lynched before we had an alternative wagon. Since that advice wasn't heeded (which turned out to be a good call given Dry-fit's alignment), the best thing for the town to do is see who was trying to underhandedly sabotage the Dry-fit wagon, regardless of their votes. If you ask me, those three people are you, Sotty, and Percy.Fur 510 wrote:RedCoyote, what makes you so sure of percy, yet you wouldn't vote dry-fit?
I thought I saw an early Sotty slip, but I had missed a post. Percy voted without giving a reason, but I ultimately had a different reason anyway. Regardless, that wasn't "provided". Then the jason wagon wasn't "provided". Nikanor was voting jason for completely unrelated reasons, and you pointed out something that I had also noticed. You didn't pursue, so I effectively led that attack. Later, jason wasn't trying very hard to push Fur. He made a few comments in his original vote, then left it there for several pages without mentioning it. I never referenced jason in my Fur vote either, so that was hardly "provided". Benmage's Percy vote here in the second phase was, again, a vote without reason. If anything Benmage's vote was just an extension of his bias attitude toward Percy throughout the game. I easily took ownership of this wagon, far from having it "provided" for me. If your underlying point here is that I'm not being aggressive enough, then I think you need to look over the evidence again. If your point is that I'm not the first official vote on these wagons, then you're being unreasonable.Elmo 515 wrote:One in which you were a vanilla townie, attacked a bunch of people and then locked onto me for the rest of the game, the other in which you vaguely mumbled you kinda sorta didn't like some people, made a few ingratiating comments, and basically sat back waiting for a wagon to be provided. None of that is explained by a difference in setup, not least because you couldn't have known how many power roles were in the first game.
He doesn't think he'll be lynched? I would imagine, regardless of his alignment, he'd feel the pressure to switch his vote, but the later he does it, the more sincere it looks.Mina 551 wrote:why isn't Percy pushing a Red Coyote lynch, the most viable counterwagon to him and easiest target of all? He's set himself up for ages to vote RC. Instead, Percy suddenly backing away from the only viable wagon other than himself, and iscriticizingthe Red Coyote wagon.
Seriously, to anyone voting Percy, explain to me what his scum motivation would be for that.
Just go back to here for my final reads. Not much has changed except I would bring Thor and LrdWhyt down some and bring Mina up.IAI 592 wrote:Red, who do you think are the 2 scum? At L-1 and scum like Percy not on your wagon, I'd like to hear this first.