Sotty wrote:His next post represents his vote on Jason as serious all along. Building a case but not actually asking Jason any questions. Doesn't look like real scum hunting, more taking advantage of a players scummish play style. He makes no elaboration on why Jason is “obv scum” and like I commented earlier, seemed to be piggy backing on Elmo's pressure.
I said why jason was scummy. If you wanted me to elaborate more, I did. I've been telling the rest of you why jason is scummy this whole fucking day, and none of you are even commenting on the points that I've been making.
As for the piggybacking, could it be that Elmo and I think alike? You know, like maybe in a game of thirteen townies and three mafiosi that two townies agree that one person is likely to be a mafioso.
Percy wrote:This. Jason's stumbling is now providing some justification, but I fail to understand how jason's reaction is scummy, rather than just a reaction from someone who is busy and didn't read the setup. Just like Benmage who didn't know about the instaflips.
My vote has never been about jason's reaction. I said that in my last post. This just goes to show how much attention you are paying to what I am saying.
Why do you think that jason is town?
jason wrote:I have been thinknig this overnight.. If Nik was seriously down to business like he says he was... why would he have to fake claim a daycop to try and justify keeping his vote on me which was random at the start but now 'serious' business.
I had already given my reasons for why I think you're scum when I claimed day cop. Nice try, though.
jason isn't even trying to look town any more. Percy, why do you think jason is town?