Zachtown in the mountains (Game over TOWN WINS!)

Dry-fit · Post Post #12 (isolation #0) » Tue Oct 19, 2010 4:13 pm

Benmage wrote:I'm thinking we no lynch off the bat..and than progress the day as if it were normal.

Wouldn't it make more sense to lynch the first day and then see what we decide from there?

Dry-fit · Post Post #51 (isolation #1) » Thu Oct 21, 2010 3:50 pm

KaleiÐoscøpe wrote:Make sense?

No.

Vote: KaleiÐoscøpe

Dry-fit · Post Post #107 (isolation #2) » Sat Oct 23, 2010 1:28 pm

imkingdavid wrote:To be honest, I don't feel like IAI is as anti-town as he has been made out to be.

Really? You don't think his self-voting tantrum was anti-town? And what is the purpose of your unvote?

unvote. Vote: Oso.

He's put far too much effort into analyzing the votes on him. I also agree that his attack on Red is stretching.

Dry-fit · Post Post #159 (isolation #3) » Sun Oct 24, 2010 9:45 pm

Mina wrote:
Dry fit wrote:Wouldn't it make more sense to lynch the first day and then see what we decide from there?
This was something I'd meant to ask you on in pregame before being side-tracked by another game. By "see what we decide from there," were you arguing that we should use both lynches, or just that we should lynch first before no-voting?

I wasn't advocating either strategy. I was saying IF we were going to only lynch once in a day, there would be no possible advantage in no lynching the first day, because all that does is make it so we can't change our minds later.

Mina wrote:I'll let Imkingdavid answer himself on his definition of "antitown," but do you suspect I am Innocent, dry-fit? Do you think his behaviour is a sign of scumminess?

IAI is one of the players I suspect the most, but the main reason I asked IKD that question is because it seemed strange to say a player isn't acting anti-town right after they had gone on a self-voting tantrum.

Oso wrote:Second, now Dry-fit is the one who is stretching. I have posted a defense against Elmo and IaI's votes against me here. It holds almost no analysis except for the part where I say I might have drawn IaI's vote because following the RC/Percy player chain of votes on Sotty7 for questioning IaI backwards, leads right back to IaI.

Maybe analysis wasn't the right word. It appeared to me that you were getting too worked up about early votes. It seemed obvious that Red had simply missed IAI say Ben's plan was scummy. If saying something verifiably wrong is almost always worthy of a vote, is Nikanor scummy for claiming daycop?

Furculow's posts up to this point have been terrible. He asks people to tell him which wagon is best, jumps on one of the biggest wagons, and then suggests we name all the scum and set up chain lynches.

However, that does look like a slip by jason.

Unvote. Vote: jasonT1981

Dry-fit · Post Post #181 (isolation #4) » Tue Oct 26, 2010 6:14 am

Sotty7 wrote:Elaborate in your next post how Jason slipped and how that is scummy.

In response to Nik claiming he had a guilty result on jason and later admitting he was lying, jason said this:

jasonT1981 wrote:ok, i see above he is lying.... Im happy with my vote. A claim like that could have outted a real cop.

As if he didn't realise it was a lie before. (Hint: If jason was town, he would have already known it was a lie.)

jasonT1981 wrote:I called Nik a liar in my initial response to him...
I posted a vote based on his lie
I then see above my post he admitted to lying.. and post so I see he is lying. meaning he just admitted to lying.

I don't buy this explanation at all.

Dry-fit · Post Post #255 (isolation #5) » Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:57 am

Sotty7 wrote:Why don't you buy the perfectly plausible explanation?

jasonT1981 wrote:and post so I see he is lying. meaning he just admitted to lying.

This is not an intuitive thought process at all.

Furcolow wrote:I am not happy with the way dry-fit is playing considering he's being wagonned. If he was really town, he would be providing a better defense for the accusations raised against him. Through ignoring them, he confirms them to be right and properly raised.

What accusations have I ignored?

I'm not sure I understand this RedCoyote wagon. Elmo why did you switch your vote to him? You hadn't voiced any suspicion of him prior to it, and gave no explanation.

Dry-fit · Post Post #315 (isolation #6) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:38 pm

Sotty7 wrote:You realize that this still doesn't answer the question right?

Why isn't it an intuitive thought process?

Well, I'm not sure it's possible to show why something isn't intuitive...

I apologize guys. I've had an unfortunate situation of having 4 exams on four consecutive school days. My last is tomorrow, so I should be able to be more active.

Dry-fit · Post Post #340 (isolation #7) » Tue Nov 02, 2010 1:56 pm

No matter how many times I read jason's post, it still looks like a slip. And his explanations have not been satisfactoryto me. What am I supposed to do?

At this point Furcolow's play has become so bizarre I think it's best to ignore it.

Other suspects include IKD, even though he's replacing out now. His attack on Benmage was weak, and everything else he's said was noncommital.

I wouldn't be surprised is there are scum on my wagon right now. The main reason people are voting for me is because they don't like how I bandwaggoned jason. There's no more to it than that. I don't think K-scope even gave a reason for voting me, is that how he normally plays?

Lrdwhyt wrote:I'm considering voting Dry, but I want to see him post some more first...

Why are you considering voting for me?

RedCoyote wrote:This doesn't change the fact that an alternative to the Dry-fit wagon, regardless how you feel about Dry-fit, is beneficial to the long-term game.

What do you mean by this?