Many moons I have been awake in cumbersome waiting for this flight of fancy
In sterling fashion I shall begin our tabernacle in the eclectic voting stage (EVS)
due to his fundamentally garrulous nature
Cherrio, Chin-Chin and all that
By Jove, It appears, I have misplaced my tags for the democratic processTwistedspoon wrote:Hoppster
but on the contrary, My headpiece is a specimen of the Panama hat family after an excursion of some discountable folly in the Senderos Gulf of El Salvador; Tierra Del FuegoHoppster wrote:one notices it to be a Bowler Hat,
fixeth that for thouHoppster wrote: I would also like to draw the atteNtion of my most learned acQuaintances to his improper, irrEgular and most erratic use of capitiliSation! Tell me, iS this Behaviour you would expeCt of a proper gentleMen? I thought not!
HarkHoppster wrote:StrangerCoug, the same reason could be used to vote for Twistedspoon, a villain who revels in his improper capitilisation. I do ask that you move your vote to Twistedspoon this instant. Do not make me write a letter of protest.
Of course. My jaunt of folly was a mere erroneous occurrenceCaboose wrote: Sir Twistedspoon's obvious error in the spelling of the French phrase "tuit de suite" amuses me.
The sole weight I see on the shoulders is his improper diction thus farTheLonging wrote: Why yes, he does many of the unpleasant "activities" you so mention but in addition to that, he has a nasty habit of claiming roles at the most improper times and acting like a much lower class savage, being the town idiot and what not. A game I have played with him with Mr. Flay as the overseer was very much so proof of this.
Whom might you suggest, my fine, learned Gentryman?kr0b wrote:instead my friends let us look at thy potential criminals.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SunHoppster wrote: Source B: After consulting my most learned colleague I have concluded that, accurately speaking (and of course we wouldn't want to speak inaccurately where possible), that the Sun is neither hot nor cold
Beyond Hoppster's capitalisation argument and poor distinguation of headgear I'm interested in Sir Hoppster's answer to this conundrumimaginality wrote:Or is there another reason for suspicion to be cast on Twistedspoon in particular?
On the contrary, my eyelids were most exercisedHoppster wrote: He also did not bat a single eyelid at me making a non-random vote upon himself (and also then confirming my vote). Villainous, I tell you!
1) Naturally, I consider every direction my play could take. The conclusion I came to was that although a Vezok stagecoach seems tempting, his reactions would be much more succulent and it does seem most ungentlemanly to wagon a player who has hardly posted yetHoppster wrote:1)Have you been considering casting your vote upon him?Twistedspoon wrote:Even If I were to vote Vezok now
2)I question your good faith in me, which seems largely unjustified.Twistedspoon wrote:As for your nonsensical voting patterns, no not expect me to understand them or question them. I trust you make your votes in good judgement even if they are wrong
By Jove, why does Sir Hoppster get a title, But not MyselfWraith wrote:Votecount 1.1
Sir HoppsterTwistedspoon, Caboose, Apokalyptika(3):
StrangerCoug(0):imaginality
Twistedspoon(2):Sir Hoppster, Sir Hoppster, StrangerCoug
imaginality(0):StrangerCoug
vezokpirakaTheLonging,(2):Sir Hoppster, imaginality
Not Votingkr0b, Feysal, GMan, inHimShallBe, kpaca, vezokpiraka(6):
With 13 remaining it shall require7to lynch the knave.
The records shall show a complete history of the day's votes, including all possible repetition of votes by one guest upon another.
Redsignifies a guest at either two or one vote from execution.
Multiple guests have not yet spoken up regarding these matters, which I suspect is due to my own error in failing to send notification of the beginning of the day's proceeding to said guests. It shall be done, and participation henceforth shall be expected. Good day.
Of courseHoppster wrote: Twistedspoon, do you believe inHim's good opinion of you to be one completely justified?
how can this be as you have accredited both the knave hoppster and myself to the post 55?imaginality wrote:[/spoiler]I myself, in post 59 wrote:Even despite this?in post 55, the honorable Twistedspoon wrote:Thus I believed the reasoning to be random
in post 55, the honorable Hoppster wrote:This vote is not one that I have cast in a random manner.
Hoppster wrote:
Real post coming tomorrow.
kpaca wrote:
I must say that I amappalledat the desires for a policy lynch,
kpaca wrote:
However, I may be a fan of lynching vezokpiraka.My previous experience....
Hoppster wrote:Twistedspoon, I would much appreciate it if you answered these outstanding points which you appear to have swept under the rug in an act of senility or wickedness.
Hoppster wrote:What nonsense is this also?Twistedspoon wrote:After all, there was no non-random reason for Hoppster to do so anyways.
well there was nothing beyond randomness for your vote. You said something about a top hat. 'twas random
Hoppster wrote:I find it most peculiar that he completely ignored my vote change to vezok
Why does this have no merit?
Why pecuilar? It was your vote? Why should I have to comment on each of your vote changes?
Hoppster wrote:Twistedspoon wrote:why is it nonsensical to have a gut scum read on hoppster?
That is not my objection. It is to your refusal to acknowledge my perfectly sound reasons for my non-random vote on yourself and also your refusal to hunt for these vile fellows over leaving your vote on me based on a hunch.
I am also most amused how Twistedspoon has finally found something worth following over his gut read of myself. What makes this suddenly more important when you were perfectly happy to keep your vote on me despite being suspicious of kr0b, I must ask
Kpaca I have a gut read of scum on too, and it is smaller than the one I have for you. However I didn't like kpaca's last post so voted for him
kpaca wrote:how experienced is twestedspoon?
vezokpiraka wrote:unvote
vote TS
In cthulu speed mafia you were scum. You played somehow like here.
Also in Execution you were town and proclaimed every time someone suspected you that you are town.
You are playing like in Cthulu mafia here.
vezokpiraka wrote:
Also sorry for the confusion. I meant {REDACTED} not Execution.
kr0b wrote: However, I believe subsequent explanations have been enough to discredit Twisted's accusations.
kr0b wrote:
And I didn't mention vezok. Partly because I think he is talking crap.
vezokpiraka wrote:Twistedspoon wrote:kr0b wrote:
And I didn't mention vezok. Partly because I think he is talking crap.
good heavens, sir, but one's language has displaced a large amount of Twinings from my mouth
You should defend about that not post fluff. That just makes me happier with my vote. You are cocky as scum and don't defend. Just like here.
Hoppster wrote:Twistedspoon wrote:Twistedspoon wrote:how have I hidden in the shadows?
I have the most posts in this thread
that's hardly hiding in shadows
thisvezokpiraka wrote:You should defend about that not post fluff.
Please stop misrepresenting people, Twistedspoon.
TheLonging wrote:Twistedspoon wrote:how have I hidden in the shadows?
I have the most posts in this thread
that's hardly hiding in shadows
I'll be back later to count how much of this is fluff
Hoppster wrote:
kr0b, I most graciously invite you to join TheLonging's most excellent wagon on vezokpiraka.
Twistedspoon wrote:Hoppster wrote:
Source B: After consulting my most learned colleague I have concluded that, accurately speaking (and of course we wouldn't want to speak inaccurately where possible), that the Sun is neither hot nor cold
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun
second paragraph, line number 5
Hoppster wrote:
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Twistedspoon
This vote is not one that I have cast in a random manner. Discuss.
Hoppster wrote:
It's not backpedalling, BECAUSE I HAD A REASON.
Hoppster wrote:
Twistedspoon wrote:your full of tricks and tunnel on me all the time whilst defending the players you know are town or are your buddies since you're mafioso. That way you get everyone against me
Okay José. Tell me then, is kpaca my buddy? Is vezok my buddy?
Hoppster wrote:
Dearie me, what have we here? In what way am I deflecting? It is perfectly relevant to the point you were making.
Guide to mafia wrote:
Do not fool yourself into thinking you can call the scumteam, especially before anyone has flipped scum. Don't bother with trying to draw connections between players until one of them is dead. It's tempting! but futile.
Hoppster wrote:You have ignored this
Hoppster wrote:
'Twas not a gambit in any way, shape, or form. I have just provided a reason. Tell me why that reason is inadequate.
Hoppster wrote:
And what makes you think yourself to be an easy lynch?
Hoppster wrote: is this an attitude you will adopt with all your scum-reads?
Hoppster wrote:for what reason did you not discuss my vote despite my prompting to do so?