It’s hasn’t been 24 hours so it might be too early for lurker prods, but I just had a game in which the town was decimated by lurking [newbie 85], so forgive me if I’m on the overzealous side.
bob and gootentag, neither have you have posted yet, and both of you already have a vote on you. bob, you were also in 85, so you should certainly know better. gootentag, you posted in another thread after this one was unlocked this morning. Any reason why?
Unvote: LoudmouthLee
Vote: gootentag
MeMe:
MeMe [20] wrote:Read and seen several times, though I'm not at all sure why this would matter. The mod provided a link to needed information in the sign-up queue, so I'm pretty sure even someone totally ignorant of the story would have adequate claiming potential (though I've not checked the link myself).
Perhaps I should have read the queue thread, especially since it gives an answer for most players.
<checks links> Actually, I *hope* everyone's already read the book; those have an awful lot of spoilers. The cliffsnotes link does seem like a likely character bank, btw. I’d ask whether anyone’s character isn’t on the list, but that seems like it would run afoul of "strategizing against the setup". Eh, perhaps I am metagaming too much, although I guess I see it like your speculating on the translation between character and role in the case of Javert. Part of the game. <shrug> Not that I think that a mass claim is a particularly good idea, but I think all possibilities should be considered before dismissed, no matter why we dismiss them.
I’d rather wait until hearing everyone’s answer before answering your "why would this matter" question, if that’s alright? It probably doesn't matter at this point, but I might as well wait. I think it’s just bob and gootentag’s status which are uncertain, so after they indicate.
MeMe [cont.] wrote:EmpTyger -- I'm not sure if you've actually got a question about the second quote attributed to me in your last post...it may have been worded sloppily but I think the meaning should be clear. I'll attempt to clarify, regardless.<snip>
In [10] you said you weren’t sure whether a non-Javert cop should come forward, but would reconsider if someone was a non-Javert cop. I was pointing out if someone came forward then there is no longer anything to consider- the non-Javert cop has already come forward! So it seemed you left it ambiguous whether a non-Javert cop should come forward, so I asked for clarification. Which you kind of did in [20], although you still are hedging.
MeMe [cont] wrote:1) sanity is always in question (unless the role specifically states sanity)<snip>
Pardon my inexperience, because I feel silly for bringing up something that seems very obvious. But, I mean, wouldn’t it defeat the purpose of insanity for the role to specifically say so?
I’m getting a bit suspicious of you, but as mentioned above I’d rather hear from everyone before placing votes for people based on their participating.
Just noticed something else:
MeMe [8] wrote:vote: gootentag
<snip>
This wasn’t explicitly labeled as random. Was it?