Any reason you haven't voted yet, Codfish?
Execution Mafia: Days of the Cold War GAMEOVER
Forum rules
- ChaosOmega
-
ChaosOmega Mafia Scum
- ChaosOmega
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2283
- Joined: May 2, 2007
- ChaosOmega
-
ChaosOmega Mafia Scum
- ChaosOmega
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2283
- Joined: May 2, 2007
- ChaosOmega
-
ChaosOmega Mafia Scum
- ChaosOmega
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2283
- Joined: May 2, 2007
Are you out of your mind? We've been playing less than 24 hours, and you're going to talk about me "lurking to victory" as scum, along with never getting caught in discussion after agreeing to do a catch-up post of what happened? I have no argument for this other than you have no idea what you're talking about.vezokpiraka wrote:Chaosomega seems incredibly off and pretty scummy. Last game 2 scums lurked their way to victory and never got caught in discussion or something like that.
Anyway, looking back over the thread.
Codfish:
Scummy. Very jumpy with suspicions, aimed at SleepyKrew initially, but has retracted to essentially agreeing with everything he says (especially post #74, while post #38 shows buddying up to SleepyKrew, and in #44, he tries to defend this point). Speaking of post #44,
Does anyone else find this line weird? Town shouldn't be concerned about their posts looking scummy, but rather catching scum. Scum, on the other hand, care very much about their posts looking like something town should say.Codfish wrote:My posts are in no way scummy, Quil
That is not true at all, since you posted that right after Quilford's posting of 3 contradictions you made this game.Codfish wrote:@Quil, your false premise is that I flipped _with_ SK and therefore I'm budding him. Your entire argument is based on this.
vezokpiraka:
vezokpiraka wrote:And until I see more from the other people I'm not voting anyone else except MoI or me.
vezokpiraka wrote:I will vote someone if I feel they are giving strong town tells or are merely good at finding scum.
This, combined with you talking about last game and other non-game things make up over half of your posts. Now that I'm on the subject, let's go back to your brilliant post about me. You attack me for saying nothing of other players in this game, but I'm reading you in iso and it's hard seeing where you yourself have done this. I found this:vezokpiraka wrote:I said that I will vote me and MoI for executioner and nobody else unless I see something really townie coming from someone.
Great. Otherwise, what have you said about other players? People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones...or masturbate in the daytime.vezokpiraka wrote:Right now Cod fish is leaning scum and jason is neutral.
vezokpiraka wrote:Why am I not open to discussion?
vezokpiraka wrote:Where the fuck did I say I am open minded?
Well, at least you're fairly consistent about not making sense.
I'll go over Quilford and SleepyKrew in my next post.Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive, so nobody listens!- ChaosOmega
-
ChaosOmega Mafia Scum
- ChaosOmega
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2283
- Joined: May 2, 2007
Zang wrote:You do realize that this isn't a normal mafia game, right? Also, do you have thoughts on anything else in the game.
I'm glad you're here to state the obvious in case I forget. As for the second part of your statement, I'll assume your post was a read-and-respond as you go, as it doesn't make much sense with you quoting another post of mine that has more information.
Zang wrote:What have you said about the other players besides codfish and vezok? You also haven't given any reason for your vote for Quilford.
Nothing, yet. My point was saying that vezokpiraka accusing me of that was weird considering what he has put forward so far this game. As for why I voted for Quilford, I like the cut of his jib.
implosion wrote:It read as a town line to me. It's the kind of thing that I feel I'd be more inclined to say as town than as scum. It feels awkward to say things like that as scum.
Fair enough. I agree that it would be awkward to say as scum. I guess it's because I can't imagine saying that regardless of role.
Quilford:
I don't really have much to say about Quilford. I agree with his case on Codfish, he's made good posts on it. The only thing that jumped out at me from his posts was him saying "scumminess is not innate to contradictions." A contradiction implies a lie, and lying is by-and-large anti-town. But this is in regards to vezokpiraka, and he explains it pretty well a few posts later:
Quilford wrote:So the 'case' on vezok seems to be that these two posts are a contradiction. They are, sure, but I don't see how this contradiction makes him scummy. I regard the former post as a bit of hyperbole, in the way you would say 'Obama is the only suitable candidate for the Presidential Election', or something like that.
SleepyKrew:
Do you think vezokpiraka is a VI, scummy, or both?Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive, so nobody listens!- ChaosOmega
-
ChaosOmega Mafia Scum
- ChaosOmega
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2283
- Joined: May 2, 2007
implosion, in your first post, you say this:
implosion wrote:SK is pinging scumdar. One of him/codfish is scum.
and then proceed to attack SleepyKrew. Why the dichotomy? And is this still your reasoning for believing Codfish to be town?
SleepyKrew, you never did answer my question:
ChaosOmega wrote:Do you think vezokpiraka is a VI, scummy, or both?Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive, so nobody listens!- ChaosOmega
-
ChaosOmega Mafia Scum
- ChaosOmega
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2283
- Joined: May 2, 2007
- ChaosOmega
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- ChaosOmega
- ChaosOmega
- ChaosOmega
- ChaosOmega
- ChaosOmega